Well, it's lightweight and easy as there is only one way into the site
[login page] - [home page]
and as we already are logging the time / user + other info, adding
#cookie.whatever#
into the log is easy.
We are just getting stats so we can target our next build.
Is there a
MacCarthy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
macarthy@iolcc:
.ie Subject: [ cf-dev ] why use
: 17 September 2002 17:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution
requires cookies to be enabled in their browser. the other method will
give you more results. But if cookies have to be enabled to access the
site, then shouldn't make any
Are most folks still developing for 800x600?
we are.
-Original Message-
From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 17:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution
Yes, we already checked
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution
Are most folks still developing for 800x600?
we are.
-Original Message-
From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 17:08
4.0?
damnit
At 17:19 17/09/02 +0100, you wrote:
Yeah 800x600
4.0 browsers and above.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 16:55
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution
Resolution
Yeah 800x600
4.0 browsers and above.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 16:55
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] why use cookie - was Logging Screen Resolution
Are most folks still developing for 800x600
