Re: looking for integration maven-subversion

2007-06-27 Thread javijava
thaks to reply me,i ttried now to use spc protocol like this: distributionManagement repository idid/id namename/name urlscp://ip_host/url /repository /distributionManagement Then , the files where deployed in the root directory on the

BUG #MRELEASE-83 - Will it be fixed?

2007-06-27 Thread Jaran Nilsen
Hello! I was told on the #maven IRC channel to post a message here. I have been struggling with the Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-6 for some time now, and it seems my problem is the same as the one reported in issue MRELEASE-83 (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-83). I see this

Re: BUG #MRELEASE-83 - Will it be fixed?

2007-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
It will be fixed in the next version Emmanuel Jaran Nilsen a écrit : Hello! I was told on the #maven IRC channel to post a message here. I have been struggling with the Maven Release plugin version 2.0-beta-6 for some time now, and it seems my problem is the same as the one reported in issue

Re: BUG #MRELEASE-83 - Will it be fixed?

2007-06-27 Thread Jaran Nilsen
Excellent :) Thanks! Jaran On 6/27/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will be fixed in the next version Emmanuel Jaran Nilsen a écrit : Hello! I was told on the #maven IRC channel to post a message here. I have been struggling with the Maven Release plugin version

Re: Question regarding 2.1 Versioning

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, Timothy Reilly wrote: I just read: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning Nice document btw, well thought out. Thanks ;) I have a curiosity question...Under: Make version handling pluggable Is this saying I would have to define version schemas using a xsd/schema, or is it

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-27 Thread Kenney Westerhof
That must be it then, though I don't know how you get a mojo to be run, declared as an extension.. Btw, i hoped for the output to name the realm, but this apparently is maven 2.0.x. if you could typecast the classloader to ClassRealm and then call 'getId()' on it, I think you'll find it prints

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-27 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Mark, I didn't follow whether you got a response on MNG-2771, but your approach is right (ie, follow wagon). Basically: 1) use contextualizable to grab the plexus container 2) lookup conflict resolvers by role hint (a pom/settings property might be a good way to trigger this) 3) use

Re: Contextualizable implemented, but not invoked

2007-06-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 6/27/07, Kenney Westerhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That must be it then, though I don't know how you get a mojo to be run, declared as an extension.. I am simply following the section on Specifying a New Packaging from

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Mark Hobson
Looks good in general. I found it a little confusing how the info was split across the two pages (Home and All Proposals). How about changing the All Proposals page to encapsulate all proposal information in one table? It would look similar to the work-in-progress table on Home, but it could

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-27 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Brett, Thanks for the reply. I was trying to get MNG-2771 POM extensions working yesterday and had troubles with both 2.0.x and 2.1. I spoke to Kenney on IRC about it and he seemed to think a fix would be easy enough, so I added IT0124 to demonstrate the problem. Kenney, did you manage to

Re: svn commit: r543579 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/JdkPrefixProfileActivator.java test/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/Jdk

2007-06-27 Thread John Casey
Yes, it's what happens when you have a Mylar task open, and you commit a change. It seems like I've heard that it's adjustable, but I'm not entirely sure where/how. Since it seems that commit messages range across the board from none to the standard ASF format, I didn't think it was that

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 07, at 6:15 AM 27 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Looks good in general. I found it a little confusing how the info was split across the two pages (Home and All Proposals). How about changing the All Proposals page to encapsulate all proposal information in one table? It would look

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Mark Hobson
On 27/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jun 07, at 6:15 AM 27 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Looks good in general. I found it a little confusing how the info was split across the two pages (Home and All Proposals). How about changing the All Proposals page to encapsulate all

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 07, at 7:15 AM 27 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 27/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jun 07, at 6:15 AM 27 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: Looks good in general. I found it a little confusing how the info was split across the two pages (Home and All Proposals).

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Mark Hobson
On 27/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I like having a listing of the work in progress on the main page so that you don't have to click to another page to see the work in progress. That said I like them all on one page, but I would like to extract the current ongoing work

Re: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 07, at 8:55 AM 27 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 27/06/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I like having a listing of the work in progress on the main page so that you don't have to click to another page to see the work in progress. That said I like them all on one

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-27 Thread Mark Hobson
On 27/06/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The alternative of using role hints would be preferable, so thanks for the pointers, I'll try implementing this now. What's the best place in the POM to configure the role hint with changing the schema though? Is there a reserved namespace of

Re: svn commit: r543579 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/JdkPrefixProfileActivator.java test/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/Jdk

2007-06-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 27/06/2007, at 11:27 PM, John Casey wrote: Yes, it's what happens when you have a Mylar task open, and you commit a change. It seems like I've heard that it's adjustable, but I'm not entirely sure where/how. Since it seems that commit messages range across the board from none to the

Re: [m2] Conflict resolvers

2007-06-27 Thread Brett Porter
The gross thing the wagon manager does for the proxy, etc is to push the settings in from the core to the wagon manager itself so there's passing it through the api. Otherwise, I guess you'll need to pass the conflict resolver property through the artifact resolver api as well to get the

RE: prepare to release eclipse 2.4

2007-06-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
Sorry, I didn't mean to start the conversation, then bail. I was hoping I could stage and call a vote before I went travelling and working off a slow cell connection. I'm still having failures on XP. Is this just a windows problem, or is stuff really broken, or is it just me? -Original

Re: svn commit: r543579 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/JdkPrefixProfileActivator.java test/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/Jdk

2007-06-27 Thread Rahul Thakur
It can be configured here: Windows (menu) Preferences (dialog) Mylar (node) Team (node) Commit Comment Template You can invoke content assist to see the available Mylar variables using Ctrl + space within the comment editor text area. Cheers, Rahul John Casey wrote: Yes, it's what

RE: Quick sketch of the dev process

2007-06-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'm coming into the thread late so I see lots of updates already. I second the suggestion that having two states called Approved Proposal(s) is a little confusing. I think that the move to a Completed Proposals can be used to combine the Completed and Approved Proposals because there doesn't seem

Re: [jira] Closed: (MNG-2577) Allow interpolation of Properties in settings.xml

2007-06-27 Thread John Casey
It's marked fixed...it works. -john On Jun 26, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Brett Porter wrote: John? On 08/06/2007, at 1:01 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Was this fixed, or won't fix? I couldn't really tell from your statement, and there's no version. On 08/06/2007, at 5:54 AM, John Casey (JIRA)

Re: svn commit: r543579 - in /maven/components/trunk/maven-project/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/JdkPrefixProfileActivator.java test/java/org/apache/maven/profiles/activation/Jdk

2007-06-27 Thread John Casey
Thanks, I'll take a look at that. -john On Jun 27, 2007, at 9:27 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: It can be configured here: Windows (menu) Preferences (dialog) Mylar (node) Team (node) Commit Comment Template You can invoke content assist to see the available Mylar variables using Ctrl +

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
Maven 2.0.4 had this problem where all the poms ended up with bad sigs due to the pom changing (pom re-write) during deploy.Maven 2.0.5 fixed that. Did 2.0.6 regress? Dan On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:28, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 26 Jun 07, at 3:09 PM 26 Jun 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I

Re: [jira] Closed: (MNG-2577) Allow interpolation of Properties in settings.xml

2007-06-27 Thread Brett Porter
There's some confusion in the issue when it was fixed. Looking at the subversion commits, it appears to only be on trunk, so should be set to 2.1-alpha-1 (not sure if it got put on the branch without indicating the issue though). Can you set the fix for version? On 28/06/2007, at 12:43

Re: Maven 2.0.6 release badly signed or changed

2007-06-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 07, at 7:45 PM 27 Jun 07, Daniel Kulp wrote: Maven 2.0.4 had this problem where all the poms ended up with bad sigs due to the pom changing (pom re-write) during deploy.Maven 2.0.5 fixed that. Did 2.0.6 regress? No, the POM is still untouched. The license files are still