Hi,
Archiva currently has a subsection of the Maven user's wiki, which is
a bit out of place.
I'd like to propose we create two spaces on cwiki.apache.org:
- ARCHIVADEV - for roadmap/proposals/etc. (edited by developers)
- ARCHIVA - for knowledge-base/faq type content (edited by users)
I
+1 (w00!)
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Archiva currently has a subsection of the Maven user's wiki, which is
a bit out of place.
I'd like to propose we create two spaces on cwiki.apache.org:
- ARCHIVADEV - for roadmap/proposals/etc. (edited by developers)
- ARCHIVA - for
Simple: Reporting.
I didn't want to have the merge contents from multiple sources in order
to produce a report.
And the structure of the plexus-registry basically forced me into using
the configuration approach over the db approach.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain the
I'm not merging until I'm done, and I'll give a heads up.
But please, be nice... :)
Actually, maybe we should race. Loser has to resolve the conflicts! :)
- Brett
On 21/08/2007, at 1:04 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I have a decent raft of new code coming in as part of MRM-463
(metadata
On 8/20/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose we create two spaces on cwiki.apache.org:
- ARCHIVADEV - for roadmap/proposals/etc. (edited by developers)
- ARCHIVA - for knowledge-base/faq type content (edited by users)
+1 for moving, but I still have concerns about
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
-- Keen
/
(No, not Commander Keen)/
LOL
I'm working as fast as I can (both velocity and quantity wise), I'll
have MRM-463 done this week.
Great! Thanks Joakim :)
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Looks great, thanks!
Definitely worth a release with the stuff
On 21/08/2007, at 1:03 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Simple: Reporting.
I didn't want to have the merge contents from multiple sources in
order to produce a report.
Makes sense, but I can't see where it is actually used?
And the structure of the plexus-registry basically forced me into
They all passed for me locally.
John - how often do you want these running in CI? every commit, or a
forced nightly build?
- Brett
On 20/08/2007, at 4:41 PM, James William Dumay wrote:
Hey guys,
As far as I can tell the integration tests are failing for the
maven-assembly-plugin
Can the
Hey there,
I signed up to Maven's Continumm instance at maven.zones.apache.org and
got the validation email. Seems that the validation url is pointing to
localhost instead of maven.zones.apache.org.
I sorted out my validation easily by replacing the hostname with
maven.zones.apache.org.
Is this
yeah, sorry.
I need to check, but I think 1.1-beta-2 fixed this problem, so maybe
we can get it upgraded.
- Brett
On 20/08/2007, at 4:45 PM, James William Dumay wrote:
Hey there,
I signed up to Maven's Continumm instance at maven.zones.apache.org
and
got the validation email. Seems
Brett,
I'm running it here on JDK 1.4. Seems maven-site-plugin
2.0-beta-6-SNAPSHOT is JDK 1.5 only?
~James
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO]
Hi guys,
and sorry if it's not the good mailing list(may be the user list would be
more appropriate, but it's a maven plugin development so ...).
I would like to extend Maven with a JSDoc Toolkit plugin in order to
document some big javascript projects.
To do this I just have to : launch the
It has come to our attention that the Spring Maven repo isn't being
properly synced into http://repo1.maven.org/maven2. It probably has
to do with the fact that the URL points to 'svn.sourceforge.net'
which has been removed by SourceForge. Could you please updated the
sync mechanism to
see mail, I've just sent you some seconds ago ;)
On 8/20/07, Ben Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has come to our attention that the Spring Maven repo isn't being
properly synced into http://repo1.maven.org/maven2. It probably has
to do with the fact that the URL points to
It seems it was mistakenly compiled against the wrong version, I have
corrected this in SVN, but not yet uploaded a new snapshot - the
versions in svn and repository seem out of alignment...
Is the beta-6-SNAPSHOT being run in a branch, or are the site plugin
developers changing the
Hi Brian,
It's controlled by a flag you can turn on and off.
Yes, it's true. I haven't pay enough attention.
cf. ignoreNonCompile :
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/analyze-mojo.html
The reason it's off by default is because you may have something required to
run the
Everything is back to normal now (apart from the 8 builds that are
failing).
Cheers,
Brett
On 20/08/2007, at 11:05 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
For those that are still subscribed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (which you should be!), I apologise
for all the build failures this morning. Apache's
+1 - thanks for this.
On 20/08/2007, at 3:46 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-model-converter 2.2. A bunch of fixes and
improvements have gone into it since the last release. A stable
release is wanted by Archiva.
Note that the issues are in JIRA for the
+1
Arnaud
On 20/08/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 - thanks for this.
On 20/08/2007, at 3:46 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-model-converter 2.2. A bunch of fixes and
improvements have gone into it since the last release. A stable
release is
It's a common problem with dynamic instantiation.
I understand why you skip runtime and test (test-runtime scope does not
exist) scope.
But what about the provide scope ? I think, by default, it should not
be
skipped as for the compile scope.
Not sure. It seems like it should be included.
It
I've adjusted the build schedule for the assembly plugin to run with -
P integration-tests and to run only once every 6 hours (4 times
daily, since this build takes quite awhile, and could be pretty
aggressive with resources...not sure on that).
Would it be feasible/difficult to allow this
Florian, let me know if this example pom helps?
This pom
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
On 21/08/2007, at 2:33 AM, John Casey wrote:
Would it be feasible/difficult to allow this build to deploy a
snapshot instead of just installing to a local repository? I'm
really wondering about SSH access for this sort of operation...
Yeah, don't do that :)
If we decide to publish
Hi Florian,
At work, we do have the need to use JSDoc and we were about to
implement a plugin ourself. If you need help or test, please let me
know so that I can see how we can do that.
Regards,
Stéphane
On 8/20/07, Florian Traverse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
and sorry if it's not the
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Deng Ching
to the PMC. Please join me in welcoming her!
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm new here - but welcome!
James
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 16:19 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Deng Ching
to the PMC. Please join me in welcoming her!
-
To unsubscribe,
Welcome, Deng!
Congrats - it's great to have you on board.
Cheers,
Brett
On 21/08/2007, at 9:19 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Deng Ching
to the PMC. Please join me in welcoming her!
--
Wendy
Wow! Congratulations Deng!
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome, Deng!
Congrats - it's great to have you on board.
Cheers,
Brett
On 21/08/2007, at 9:19 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Deng Ching
to the PMC.
Thanks everyone! :-)
-Deng
Henry Isidro wrote:
Wow! Congratulations Deng!
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome, Deng!
Congrats - it's great to have you on board.
Cheers,
Brett
On 21/08/2007, at 9:19 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the
Deng!!! Congratz :D
On 8/21/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone! :-)
-Deng
Henry Isidro wrote:
Wow! Congratulations Deng!
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome, Deng!
Congrats - it's great to have you on board.
Cheers,
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
caught (and it's picking up a lot more
Congratulations Deng and welcome! :-)
- John
On 8/21/07, allan ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deng!!! Congratz :D
On 8/21/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone! :-)
-Deng
Henry Isidro wrote:
Wow! Congratulations Deng!
On 8/21/07, Brett
Welcome and congrats!
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 7:20 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: The Maven PMC welcomes Deng Ching
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Deng Ching
to the PMC. Please join
+1
Brett, you didn't vote.
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are
heh, +1 for the record :)
On 21/08/2007, at 3:02 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
+1
Brett, you didn't vote.
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have
It's why I'm not in favor of the decision we made to use branches.
First times it could be a game. Following times it's quickly the war.
The one who want to be the first to back home (in a corporate env)
will commit its code with less checks and the last one will be
punished by having to merge
Welcome Deng !
cheers
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome and congrats!
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 7:20 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: The Maven PMC welcomes Deng Ching
I'm
hehe - to be clear, I was kind of joking. My stuff is on a branch
because I don't like local changes and because it isn't yet 100%
working. I don't want to interfere with the release.
It's existence will also help Joakim to review it and understand
where there are potential conflicts, and
38 matches
Mail list logo
