+1
-Lukas
Brian Fox wrote:
Time to release the updated parent poms:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/apache-staging-011/org/apache/apache/6/apache-6.pom
+1
Arnaud
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote:
+1
-Lukas
Brian Fox wrote:
Time to release the updated parent poms:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/apache-staging-011/org/apache/apache/6/apache-6.pom
2 * +1
--
Olivier
2009/4/21 Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu:
Time to release the updated parent poms:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/apache-staging-011/org/apache/apache/6/apache-6.pom
2 * +2
-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Olivier Lamy
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 2:55 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] release apache parent 6 and maven parent 12
2 * +1
--
Olivier
2009/4/21 Brian Fox
Do you see that Google choose Mercurial rather than Git ?
Mercurial support for Project Hosting on Google Code
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for-project-hosting.html
Analysis of Git and Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis
Rémy
2009/4/27 Rémy Sanlaville remy.sanlavi...@gmail.com
Do you see that Google choose Mercurial rather than Git ?
well, they didn't exactly choose one over the other - they decided to
implement Mercurial support first because it fitted better (at the time)
with GoogleCode hosting - I wouldn't be
+1 (but as I'm not currently an apache committer it probably does not count)
-Stephen
2009/4/27 HUYNH GIANG SON huynh.giang.son...@gmail.com
2 * +2
-Original Message-
From: oliver.l...@gmail.com [mailto:oliver.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Olivier Lamy
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009
This will work for svn exports as well, so maybe the profile id could
be tweaked to without-svn?
On 27/04/2009, at 10:20 PM, jdca...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Date: Mon Apr 27 12:20:40 2009
New Revision: 768943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=768943view=rev
Log:
adding
Do you see that Google choose Mercurial rather than Git ?
Mercurial support for Project Hosting on Google Code
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for-project-hosting.html
Analysis of Git and Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis
Rémy
sure, that's easy enough
Brett Porter wrote:
This will work for svn exports as well, so maybe the profile id could be
tweaked to without-svn?
On 27/04/2009, at 10:20 PM, jdca...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Date: Mon Apr 27 12:20:40 2009
New Revision: 768943
URL:
Hi all,
I 've got a problem with the deployement of an ejb module. In my case,
i've a multi-projects with WTP 3.0.5.
I reference the ejb module as dependency in the POM of my web project.
But, when i want deploy it on Tomcat 6.0, my ejb module isn't exported.
However if i update manually the
2009/4/27 John Casey (JIRA) j...@codehaus.org
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=174313#action_174313]
John Casey commented on MNG-4082:
-
This has been
yeah, I'll take a look at this.
Brett Porter wrote:
2009/4/27 John Casey (JIRA) j...@codehaus.org
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=174313#action_174313]
John Casey commented on MNG-4082:
Just wanted to comment on this to fix any misconceptions. Hg has
support for multiple branches in one repo, Mercurial calls those named
branches. It's up to individual projects if they want to use this
feature vs a separate clone to create a branch.
-Original Message-
From: Antony
14 matches
Mail list logo
