Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 (non binding) works fine with gwt-maven plugin 2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr +1 Hervé Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go! Apart from another few regression fixes,

maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-X: dependencySet is now including project artifact in outputDirectory

2010-09-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
I can't tell exactly when this occurred since we forked an internal release of 2.2 at r487459 where we have applied patches for * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-118 * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-166 * http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-170 I suspect beta-1 has this

Re: maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-X: dependencySet is now including project artifact in outputDirectory

2010-09-02 Thread John Casey
In your dependencySet, specify the following: useProjectArtifactfalse/useProjectArtifact That should take care of things. On 9/2/10 3:21 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote: I can't tell exactly when this occurred since we forked an internal release of 2.2 at r487459 where we have applied patches for *

Re: maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-X: dependencySet is now including project artifact in outputDirectory

2010-09-02 Thread John Casey
BTW, this was added for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-197, in revId 549995. -j On 9/2/10 10:18 AM, John Casey wrote: In your dependencySet, specify the following: useProjectArtifactfalse/useProjectArtifact That should take care of things. On 9/2/10 3:21 AM, Barrie Treloar

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, Despite a few known bugs in the code, I consider the vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Brian Fox, Emmanuel Venisse, Arnaud Héritier, Oliver Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold +1 (non-binding): Paul Merlin, Stephen Connolly, Tony Chemit,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-09-02 Thread Paul Gier
Sorry, for the late response. I'm running into a few issues building the JBoss App server with beta-3. I'm currently trying to narrow down the issues enough to create small test projects/test cases. The issues seem to be related to very specific edge cases, so I don't think they are things to

[ANN] Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 Released

2010-09-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3. Maven is a project comprehension and build tool, designed to simplify the process of maintaining a healthy development lifecycle for your project. You can read more here: http://maven.apache.org/ Downloads of

Welcome Kristian Rosenvold to the Maven PMC

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
This is a little delayed, but still deserved. A few weeks ago, Kristian joined us on the Maven PMC. He's been driving a lot of interesting work in Maven 3 to support parallel builds. If you haven't tried that out yet, please do and send some feedback. Welcome Kristian! --Brian Fox Maven PMC

Re: Welcome Kristian Rosenvold to the Maven PMC

2010-09-02 Thread Paul Benedict
Congrats to Kristian!! On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: This is a little delayed, but still deserved. A few weeks ago, Kristian joined us on the Maven PMC. He's been driving a lot of interesting work in Maven 3 to support parallel builds. If you haven't

Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
Now that Maven 3 beta 3 is out with Guice and Aether, we can pretty safely call it feature complete. I'd like to propose a few goals to get some things done. We have ApacheCon coming up the first week of November, and it would be great to set that as a target to get Maven 3.0 out the door. So far

Re: maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-X: dependencySet is now including project artifact in outputDirectory

2010-09-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:48 PM, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote: In your dependencySet, specify the following: useProjectArtifactfalse/useProjectArtifact Cheers. Did I just miss this in the documentation (other than in the configuration page)? I've had another look around the doco

Maven 3 goals for release questions

2010-09-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
I didn't want to hijack the other thread with my questions after reading https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html Caching of Artifact Resolution Errors Marker files are great! Is there any documentation on what they are? The maven-eclipse-plugin has the hack I added

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: Now that Maven 3 beta 3 is out with Guice and Aether, we can pretty safely call it feature complete. I'd like to propose a few goals to get some things done. We have ApacheCon coming up the first week of November, and it would

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: Now that Maven 3 beta 3 is out with Guice and Aether, we can pretty safely call it feature complete. I'd like to propose a few goals to get some things

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
I think trying to release 3.0 sooner, and then sticking to 6 week release cycles would be a better use of time. We're going to fix anything that arises but I don't believe there will be widespread testing until 3.0 is released, and I don't believe many will pick up 3.x in large-scale production

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Paul Benedict
When 3.0 is released, is 2.2 pretty much a dead branch? I have no problem with that btw :-) On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: I think trying to release 3.0 sooner, and then sticking to 6 week release cycles would be a better use of time. We're going to fix

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
When 3.0 is released, is 2.2 pretty much a dead branch? I have no problem with that btw :-) Isn't it essentially dead now? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Derricutt
Personally I'd still like to see some resolution to the problems introduced by the version range resolution change ( no more -SNAPSHOT resolution except for on the bounds ). On one hand I applaud the change from a release standpoint, but it currently causes issues for our integration build

snapshot range changes in m3

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
Forking this discussion: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote: Personally I'd still like to see some resolution to the problems introduced by the version range resolution change ( no more -SNAPSHOT resolution except for on the bounds ). On one hand I applaud

Re: maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-X: dependencySet is now including project artifact in outputDirectory

2010-09-02 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:48 PM, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote: In your dependencySet, specify the following: useProjectArtifactfalse/useProjectArtifact Cheers. Did I just miss this in the documentation

[jira] Subscription: Design Best Practices

2010-09-02 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design Best Practices (24 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: Setting goals for upcoming releases

2010-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
I think i agree with Jason on shooting maven 3.0 out to public as soon as you can, however the dev team might want fix up blocking bugs which prevent user like me from using maven 3 one of the blocking bug for me is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4788 Thanks -Dan On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at

Re: snapshot range changes in m3

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Derricutt
Any pointers to where in the code base I should start looking/hacking if I wanted to try and write such a patch? As I'm the main one arguing for this improvement, I'm willing to at least try and solve it :) -- Pull me down under... On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu

Re: snapshot range changes in m3

2010-09-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'm concerned by this fix too. Here are my thought for now: the fix should not have been done in VersionRange but in a version conflict resolution phase, since a range is a mathematical notion we can't alter. but I didn't have time yet to transform these thoughts in code... Regards, Hervé