I have a question regarding Archetype customization.
Consider i have two files FILE1.java and FILE2.java , How can i customize my
archetype-metadata.xml so that , according to my choice i can select
FILE1.java or FILE2.java at the time of mvn archetype:generate.
Is it possible ? Can you send me
Isn't the correct staging site here:?
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin-1.0.1/
It got deployed by you yesterday...
HTH,
-Lukas
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
There is something weird with the multi-module site in enforcer. I
don't have the time
to debug this one at the
Well yes, it's there, but the left-hand menu items point to the current
production version instead of the newly staged versions.
This seems to be because the xref between the plugin (with a specific
url) and the remaining enforcere modules
(with a different url) does not work when staging. If
Somewhat confused now: is this vote for the enforcer-plugin alone? Ie
did you only stage-deploy the plugin site or the whole enforcer site? (I
suppose this needs to be released and voted on as well?)
The plugin site uses relative links in the menu that lead out of the
current project, so
PS: I don't think that's a reason to cancel the vote, the links will be
correct on the final site.
-Lukas
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Well yes, it's there, but the left-hand menu items point to the current
production version instead of the newly staged versions.
This seems to be because the
I tried to deploy the whole enforcer project (so I suppose the vote
topic was incorrect). I did stage-deploy of the whole enforcer project,
but if you're looking at what files I managed
to upload yesterday, you'll probably see a number of different attempts.
I'll try tonight with 2.3 and
I'm cancelling until I'm satisifed (or exhausted from trying) ;)
Kristian
Den 16.06.2011 11:41, skrev Lukas Theussl:
PS: I don't think that's a reason to cancel the vote, the links will
be correct on the final site.
-Lukas
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Well yes, it's there, but the
+1
-Lukas
Benson Margulies wrote:
Hi,
We solved 1 issues:
** Improvement
* [MPOM-12] - Update maven-plugins to new org.apache.maven:maven-parent:20
There are no open JIRAs against the maven-plugins parent.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 6/16/11, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote:
From: Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE]: release version 21 of the parent POM for maven plugins
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, June 16, 2011, 11:40 AM
+1
Is there a forthcoming explanation for a seemingly Maven PMC shakeup?
I find it odd that consistently excellent contributors such as Lukas,
Brian, et al are suddenly not on the Maven PMC. This is concerning as
these are people who have drastically improved and moved Maven
forward. It's very
Only speaking for myself, I would like to stress that I stepped back
from the PMC for purely personal reasons. Though it certainly
facilitated my decision, the events that occupied the PMC at the time
are in no causal relation to my retirement.
Said events will hopefully be explained by
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Lukas Theussl, Olivier Lamy, Mark Struberg, Vincent
Siveton, Stephen Connolly, Stéphane Nicoll
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
S.
-
To
Jeff,
I believe this strictly falls within the purview of the Apache Board to
explain. In particular Jim, Doug and Shane.
Only the board has the right to reveal the business that has been transacted on
private lists.
Rest assured that's Sonatype's commitment to Maven users and our pursuit of
I find it somewhat bewildering that there is no post of the vote or the
results on the dev and users mailing lists I can see. Nor does the web
site seem to be updated.
http://maven.apache.org/team-list.html
I would have expected more transparency from Apache.
manfred
Jeff,
I believe this
Hi,
The release includes the enforcer-plugin, enforcer-rules and
enforcer-api modules. The site-staging problems from take 1 were fixed
in r1136499. The only diff between this vote and take 1 is the site
deployment.
We solved 2 issues:
Good Afternoon Manfred
from my understanding the maven hierarchy looks like:
JASON (aka god)
|
v
Everyone else
(pull up a pew)
Bedankt,
Martin
Hm... sure Jason had and still has lots of influence. But so does Linus
and so do other BDFL's. Imho the Maven project has tons of good people
involved in the community around the core and the plugins. Jason is one of
them and there are MANY others. There should be cooperation and open
Martin,
I don't think that your message helps anyone here. Jason's email is a
very gracious acknowledgement of the governance of the Apache Software
Foundation. The changes in the Maven PMC result from a complex
situation, and many people are working hard behind the scenes to
resolve that
Yeah, Jason is a standup guy and that didn't come off very well at all.
Whatever is going on I wouldn't worry too much about maven in general.
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 14:28, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
I
granted..maybe im old fashioned but I believe the person who created the
project *should* have a say
operating under the assumption everything good takes time what is taking
place to cause this shift?
bedankt,
Martin Gainty
__
Jogi és Bizalmassági
+1
2011/6/14 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 1 issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11391version=17198
There are still 2 issues left in JIRA:
+1
2011/6/14 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved/improved quite a few things. Issue tracking does not seem to
be actively used for this project, svn log attached below
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-012/
Staging site:
+1
2011/6/14 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 17 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17312
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Bill, I'd recommend posting this question to the Flexmojos user list.
Here's a link to:
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos/topics
Tim
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:31 PM, sg057052 bill.burf...@sabre.com wrote:
I followed an example on a flexmojos site at
sorry, this is not an actual feature of archetype plugin
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011, goutham a écrit :
I have a question regarding Archetype customization.
Consider i have two files FILE1.java and FILE2.java , How can i customize
my archetype-metadata.xml so that , according to my
Hi Tim-
interesting question!
i took hermans Original codebase
layout is created which incorporates:
sample mxml created
sample as scripts are created
mxmlc on the mxmlc to produce swf
internationalisation:
1)I assume you have xml input? append each xml input with language_country e.g.
en_US
Just to make a couple of things clear, that weren't stated elsewhere in the
thread:
On 16/06/2011, at 11:42 PM, Jeff Jensen wrote:
It's very concerning that a heavy committer such as Benjamin
is no longer committing as he has done very useful, fantastic work.
There has been no change to who
(sorry for the delay, I've not forgotten, just been busy)
On 25/05/2011, at 12:34 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 05/24/2011 01:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Some notes on how I think it should work:
- templates should look like a normal POM (perhaps only differing in root
element, and less strict
Hi Maurizio,
Re-reading this, I saw before we had a lot of agreement, but re-reading I see
you also had a question...
On 25/05/2011, at 1:44 AM, Maurizio Pillitu wrote:
However, I'm sure you're already noticing some limitations:
- you can't get in before interpolation, so properties used
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:36:45 PM Martin Gainty wrote:
granted..maybe im old fashioned but I believe the person who created the
project *should* have a say
Unless that person decided they no longer want a say. Jason resigned from
the PMC back in January. He voluntarily removed himself
Correction: in the 24 hours I forgot about, we got two more binding votes:
Herve Boutemy and Vincent Siveton.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
You know, I tried to check it against the PMC list on the page, and I
very distinctively thought that i
Once the vote passes on the plugin parent, I'd like to turn around and
start a release on maven-changes-plugin. Please let me know if anyone
(Dennis?) thinks that something else needs to happen first.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 6/16/11 8:11 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
(sorry for the delay, I've not forgotten, just been busy)
On 25/05/2011, at 12:34 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 05/24/2011 01:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Some notes on how I think it should work:
- templates should look like a normal POM (perhaps only
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (24 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
when i run mvn archetype:generate it asks for parameters like groupId ,
artifactId , package and version.
Now i want to ask for an extra parameter like module-author but i want
to ask in this manner
Do you want to enter module-author? ( Y / N)
(on entering Y , i should ask for the
35 matches
Mail list logo
