Re: Eclipse plugin ITs was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse Plugin version 2.9

2012-01-16 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/1/16 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com: Thanks a lot for this hard wok Barrie yes it was my problem too Robert. ITs are now very difficult to use/maintain and sadly are covering only the fact that what

Re: Eclipse plugin ITs was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse Plugin version 2.9

2012-01-16 Thread Benson Margulies
The marriage of eclipse and maven poses fundamental challenges that don't exist for Intellij or Netbeans. Of the three major Java IDE's, only Eclipse incorporates its own classpath and compiler system. IJ and NB 'just run maven' and analyze the output for display. Eclipse, on the other hand,

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC5 staged

2012-01-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, So it looks we don't have any issues here. I will proceed a non RC release procedure tomorrow. Thanks for your testing time ! 2012/1/11 Robert Scholte apa...@sourcegrounds.com: looking good. Tested on a lot of mojo projects. -Robert On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:31:12 +0100, Jeff MAURY

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 January 2012 11:11, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 20:22:15 Stephen Connolly a écrit : personally i think we need to draw a line in the sand for all plugins... 2.2.1 is the best line at the moment imho... +1 2.1.0 and 2.2.0 are not recommended

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 16 January 2012 15:45, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 January 2012 11:11, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 20:22:15 Stephen Connolly a écrit : personally i think we need to draw a line in the sand for all plugins... 2.2.1 is

[site] site.xml head/footer inheritance

2012-01-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I am having troubles with the skin (lst check before re-proposing the skins releases) and while trying to apply fluido on Apache Commons I noticed that, attaching a site.xml descriptor to a parent, while the body.head element is inherited from cildren, body.footer is not. Did I miss

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-16 Thread Robert Scholte
So what you're actually saying: Let's force people to NOT use Maven-2.1.0 of 2.2.0 by setting the prerequisite for maven to 2.2.1 And hence, we get the Doxia verison we want. That would solve two problems at once. -Robert On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:47:39 +0100, Stephen Connolly

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Well actually I'd say force people to use 2.2.2 after rolling a 2.2.2 that does not barf on the 3.0.3 metadata in local repo... such a 2.2.2 does not need to understand the extra metadata, just not barf on it (i.e. copy the 2.2.1 tag, make the metadata forgiving, release 2.2.2 so that the changes

Plugin development question

2012-01-16 Thread Bob Bick
I am developing a Maven 2.2.1 plugin that will leverage JAR file(s) that vary depending on the target runtime system. These two examples describe the logic. 1) When the Maven plugin executes on a Linux box, it is going to fork off a Java application with a CLASSPATH that includes: a.jar

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.7

2012-01-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
While fixing MEAR-60 is something very good, I am a bit worried about the lack of tests. There's only one IT. Other than that, looks good except a few things I've seen in recent commits but I have contacted 'rfscholte' to get some feedback. My +1 Thanks Dennis! S. On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.7

2012-01-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg, Hervé Boutemy, Stephane Nicoll I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2012-01-12 23:40, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 4 issues, including [MEAR-60] Improve support for

Error fetching link when running Javadoc Report, but can't find link

2012-01-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi When looking through the build log for the EAR Plugin release, I noticed a couple of errors like this one: --- [INFO] Generating JavaDocs report--- Maven Javadoc Plugin 2.8 [ERROR] Error fetching link: http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net/apidocs/package-list. Ignored it. [INFO] Loading source

Intention to release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.8.1

2012-01-16 Thread John Casey
I'm eager to get a release that has some of the fixes already on trunk, particularly those related to aggregating javadocs using dependencies. Does anyone have any objection to me calling a vote to release 2.8.1 with the seven closed issues that are currently assigned to it? The release

Re: Intention to release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.8.1

2012-01-16 Thread Manfred Moser
I would love for those changes to go out.. On 12-01-16 12:42 PM, John Casey wrote: I'm eager to get a release that has some of the fixes already on trunk, particularly those related to aggregating javadocs using dependencies. Does anyone have any objection to me calling a vote to release

Re: Error fetching link when running Javadoc Report, but can't find link

2012-01-16 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Dennis, Check the org.apache.maven.plugin.javadoc.AbstractJavadocMojo.getJavadocLink(MavenProject) It will build a javadoc link relative to the project URL as described in the pom of the dependency. -Robert On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:27:07 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org

[ANN] Maven EAR Plugin 2.7 Released

2012-01-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven EAR Plugin, version 2.7 The most noteworthy in this release is the support for skinny WAR files. It is one of the most voted on issues in our JIRA with 50 votes. We would love to hear your feedback on this new feature. The plugin

Re: Intention to release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.8.1

2012-01-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Sounds good On Monday, January 16, 2012, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote: I'm eager to get a release that has some of the fixes already on trunk, particularly those related to aggregating javadocs using dependencies. Does anyone have any objection to me calling a vote to release 2.8.1