Hello,
I would be very interested to have [1] implemented. Our use case is to
compile a subpart of our aggregator + all associated dependencies. The
current behaviour requires us to provide *all* individual modules, which
defeats the purpose of aggregators.
I've made a patch proposal a while ago
+1
Emmanuel
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven SCM 1.7.
We fixed 18 issues ( http://s.apache.org/SCM-1.7 )
One new feature is the support of Jazz Scm (thanks to Chris Graham !)
The staging repository is available
Hi,
We resolved 9 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=ACIO-CAVI-QX7G-9IAS%7Cb183085c89ca85abde86540c1f02cb433b8719dd%7Cloutversion=17447styleName=TextprojectId=11212Create=Create
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
The idea sounds fine. Changing the semantics of existing functionality is not a
good idea. If you can implement it such that it is purely additive, and
orthogonal, to existing functionality it's much easier to evaluate. Changing
how the switch might work for those using it currently is not
Hi,
I'd like to work on 1.5 Annotations for Mojos.
Hervé started documentation here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+5+Annotations+for+Plugins
The Stephen's idea for named without Mojo prefix looks fine (at least
for me). But I would prefer to not implement (yet) the other
The staging site is actually at
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.7/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/.
And I'm the one who added the text to the page saying, 'check for
staging problems before running the release'. Sigh.
Also, here's my own +1, which I forgot.
On Fri, Apr 27,
+100
I've had a talk about this with Simone this month.
He'd done some investigation already.
I think there are two separate steps to be taken.
1. Generate the plugin.xml based on both annotations and doclets
2. Extend Maven Core to understand Mojo Annotations as well
The first one would
+1
Robert
Op Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:07:34 +0200 schreef Emmanuel Venisse
emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com:
+1
Emmanuel
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven SCM 1.7.
We fixed 18 issues ( http://s.apache.org/SCM-1.7 )
One new
We have implemented a Java 5 annotation for configuration parameters
(PullParameter) in the Android Maven Plugin that might be worth looking
at. We are still phasing them out across the system but a good place to
look at the usage is the ProguardMojo
Hi there,
I think JFrog (the Artifactory guys) has already published a set of Java
1.5 annotations for mojo development, including a m-plugin-p extension to
use them. The source code is available on github [1], but unfortunately the
artifacts are not available in Central (there is a ticket in
On 27 April 2012 01:34, Vincent Latombe vincent.lato...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be very interested to have [1] implemented. Our use case is to
compile a subpart of our aggregator + all associated dependencies. The
current behaviour requires us to provide *all* individual modules, which
Err, I did upload to central (the 1.4.1 release).
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22br.com.ingenieux.maven.annomojo%22
I wish those could be resolved. JFrog's solution is great and it works like
a charm.
--
-- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br / http://meadiciona.com/aldrinleal
I would prefer not be core change dependent. Some folks are still using 2.x
.
And 'classloader scanning' at runtime level will have IHMO a performance
cost !
So I would prefer plugin metadata generation (the trick will be having the
mix of doclet and annotations : perso I'm not sure it's a good
On 04/27/2012 01:39 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
What about -am and -amd?
-am does work together with -pl. Vincent's issue is that -pl must be given a
full list of submodules; just passing an aggregator is not enough. For example,
take
top
+- libs
| +- lib1
| +- lib2
+- apps
+- app1
|
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Site Plugin 2,
version 2.4
The Maven Site Plugin is a plugin that generates a site for the current project.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-2.4
You should specify the version in your project's plugin
On 04/27/2012 01:34 PM, Ansgar Konermann wrote:
JFrog (the Artifactory guys) has already published a set of Java
1.5 annotations for mojo development, including a m-plugin-p extension to
use them.
Beware that (acc. to their documentation) the tool relies on APT, which is
deprecated in JDK 6
On 27 April 2012 13:29, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 04/27/2012 01:39 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
What about -am and -amd?
-am does work together with -pl. Vincent's issue is that -pl must be given a
full list of submodules; just passing an aggregator is not enough. For
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 2.4.
We fixed: 13 issues (http://s.apache.org/MCOMPILER-2.4)
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-008/
Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin-2.4
(wait sync).
Guide to
Hi,
We solved 19 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146styleName=Htmlversion=16489
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11146status=1
Staging repo:
On 2012-04-27 17:40, Benson Margulies wrote:
The staging site is actually at
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.7/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/.
And I'm the one who added the text to the page saying, 'check for
staging problems before running the release'. Sigh.
This is
Some of us are still on 2.0.x.
I for one, don't see the need to introduce (the possibility of) annotation
hell into what is an already well understood mechanism.
-Chris
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
I would prefer not be core change dependent. Some
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-04-27 17:40, Benson Margulies wrote:
The staging site is actually at
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.7/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/.
And I'm the one who added the text to the page
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually, I've been working on a Maven extension that uses checksums
to determine whether a particular project needs to be rebuilt (taking
all its dependencies into account). We are currently using a Bash
script
On 27 April 2012 17:51, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually, I've been working on a Maven extension that uses checksums
to determine whether a particular project needs to be rebuilt (taking
all its
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
On 27 April 2012 17:51, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually, I've been working on a Maven extension that uses
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 26 avril 2012 18:23:13 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven SCM 1.7.
We fixed 18 issues ( http://s.apache.org/SCM-1.7 )
One new feature is the support of Jazz Scm (thanks to Chris Graham !)
The staging repository is available here:
for the moment, we didn't come to something yet
what is missing is:
1. feedback about proposed procedure [1]
2. parent pom modification with m-site-scm-publish-p to match previous
procedure
3. initial import
help on 1 2 would be greatly appreciated
And I'm looking into 3.
Regards,
Hervé
yes, +1 for the first step - ie annotations for plugin.xml generation
but -0 for discovery with runtime annotation instead of plugin.xml
and yes, I took time to document (end reference JFrog's implementation) but
don't have really time to code it even if the feature would be a great benefit
On 27 April 2012 18:20, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
On 27 April 2012 17:51, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.comwrote:
29 matches
Mail list logo
