Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Not sure I follow, but I'm just saying that don't up the 'prerequisites' element unless there is a real reason. That element also controls which Maven versions that can USE the plugin. If you want to ensure/force a specific minimum for building just use the enforce-plugin. /Anders On Thu, Oct 8,

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

... understand. I will take care.. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Anders Hammar [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5847858...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Not sure I follow, but I'm just saying that don't up the 'prerequisites' > element unless there is a real reason. That element also controls which >

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Just for building 2015-10-08 9:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Hammar : > Ok, just to build or to use as well? > > 'prerequisites' is for usage. maven-enforcer-plugin with > requireMavenVersion=[3.0.5,) is for building. > > /Anders > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < >

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Hi Anders, Sorry for that, you wasn't in our internal discussion in December 2014 or November where we agreed to release experimental API in 2.x, and 3.0. I think I can release the new API in last 2.20 this year and I will listen to impression from our Maven Users. We already have the API in a

Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

Hello All, More than a year ago INFRA announce availability of code signing at Apache: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available but still there is no maven plugin for doing that :( I never wrote maven plugins and need more time to write "Hello world" level plugins

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Does m2e still want to pollute POMs withcryptic entries? There are alternative storage possibilities, but that doesn't fix the inherited difficulties. Just mákes the SCM purists happy (and forces other users to live

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Why 3.0.5? We've had this discussion (in general for plugins) before and IIRC we decided on 3.0. /Anders On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Do you agree to specify these build requirements in surefire POM? > > > 3.0.5 > > > Updating

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

Thanks for the quick answer :) You can contact INFRA on hipchat http://infra.chat/ to get test environment for plugin :) On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:32 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > I think we have a plugin based on Eclipse sign infrastructure code in my > company, I will check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

Based on the session Tibor and I had yesterday this issue is only related to a specific environment setup which has not been covered by the IT's.. So here is my +1 Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 10/8/15 7:23 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: I keep it open, because the CI pass. We next time

Re: Re: Dependencies in Dep Mngt without version

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Oktober 2015 um 06:36 Uhr > Von: "Igor Fedorenko" > An: dev@maven.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Dependencies in Dep Mngt without version > > I believe MNG-5727 is a different issue. Here you have unused invalid > element. I don't have strong opinion

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

Hello, I think we have a plugin based on Eclipse sign infrastructure code in my company, I will check how custom it is an how the licensing looks like. [Sometimes I think a JCE/PkCS11 based solution (using ordinary jar signer) has (besides the missing mandatory archiving) its merits. This does

Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Do you agree to specify these build requirements in surefire POM? 3.0.5 Updating README.txt in GitHub. Adding configuration of maven-enforcer-plugin with requireMavenVersion=[3.0.5,) and removing in every POM: ${mavenVersion} Configuring maven-plugin-plugin:

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Surefire requires 3.0.5 to build, due to bugs in earlier versions. Kristian 2015-10-08 9:04 GMT+02:00 Anders Hammar : > Why 3.0.5? > > We've had this discussion (in general for plugins) before and IIRC we > decided on 3.0. > > /Anders > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:43 AM,

Re: Maven and JDK requirements in Surefire

Ok, just to build or to use as well? 'prerequisites' is for usage. maven-enforcer-plugin with requireMavenVersion=[3.0.5,) is for building. /Anders On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Surefire requires 3.0.5 to build, due to bugs in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Tree version 3.0

Hi, checksum checked Ok. Checked via: mvn clean verify with the following Maven versions: Maven 3.0.5 (JDK 6, JDK 7, JDK 8), Maven 3.1.1 (JDK 6, JDK 7, JDK 8), Maven 3.2.5 (JDK 6, JDK 7, JDK 8), Maven 3.3.3 (JDK 7, JDK 8) without any issue. So +1 from me Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils 3.0.0

Hi, Note: This is a Maven 3.0 / JDK 6 release We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12333677 There are several issue open:

Need help In creating The Maven oroject In Jboss Developer Studio

Hi dev, I am really stuck in creating creating maven project in JDBS.Need guidence. thanks Suchitra

surefire 2.19 hangs

cd maven-core This does not hang mvn test -nsu --Dtest=org/apache/maven/toolchain/**/*Test.java mvn test -nsu -Dtest=**/RequirementMatcherFactoryTest.java,**/ArtifactHandlerTest.java This hangs mvn test -nsu -Dtest=org/apache/maven/**/*Test.java Are the tests dependent on each other, especially

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

Upgrading maven core to 2.19 ( https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven.git) consistently hangs on org.apache.maven.artifact.handler.ArtifactHandlerTest, this works on 2.18. So I'm -1 until we can find out what's happening... Kristian 2015-10-08 10:47 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: Need help In creating The Maven oroject In Jboss Developer Studio

Hi, can you please ask on the user list...this is the developers list of Maven... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 10/8/15 12:41 PM, suchitra mp wrote: Hi dev, I am really stuck in creating creating maven project in JDBS.Need guidence. thanks Suchitra

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

Isn’t it a process which didn’t stopped correctly on windows and it avoids to delete the surefirebooter jar ? Love windows ….. > On 08 Oct 2015, at 15:00, Tibor Digana wrote: > > after mvn clean: > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

On 6 October 2015 at 15:40, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1 binding. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > -1

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

after mvn clean: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) on project maven-core: Failed to clean project: Failed to delete D:\vcs\maven-master\maven-core\target\surefire\surefirebooter8559182412130340457.jar -> [Help 1] It looks like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.6

+1 2015-10-06 15:41 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies : > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues: > > ** New Feature > * [MASSEMBLY-780] - Snappy supported > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils 3.0.0

+1 On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > Note: This is a Maven 3.0 / JDK 6 release > > We solved 4 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12333677 > > There are several issue open: >

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

ArtifactHandlerTest passed. This is my outcome. Which test hangs then, how can I find it in the order? --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.maven.artifact.handler.ArtifactHandlerTest Tests

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

Sorry for the top post, phone. So are you saying that the way forward is to have junk in POM files for the way each kind of IDE does its business? Tall about mixing model and view! There is nothing wrong with eclipse:eclipse IMO but I have no spare cycles to maintain it. I'm not sure why Maven

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

No one is going out of their way to break anything. No one is willing to maintain it. So, consistent with Apache policy, it should be 'attic-ed'. If then, some people want to take advantage of the Apache license and fork it into mojohaus, that's their privilege under the license. There's no such

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

Because it is impossible to maintain it nowadays. Too much features (support for many eclipse distress with many extensions like WTP…), not enough tests and the impossibility to validate anything at the end because configuration files used by eclipse are evolving, not documented and there is no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.6

Hi, checked shasum Ok.. Checked via mvn -Prun-its clean verify No issue found. On 10/6/15 3:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Hi, We solved 1 issues: ** New Feature * [MASSEMBLY-780] - Snappy supported There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

Yes, I used Windows. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Isn’t it a process which didn’t stopped correctly on windows and it avoids > to delete the surefirebooter jar ? > Love windows ….. > > > > On 08 Oct 2015, at 15:00, Tibor Digana

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

@Stian Soiland-Reyes I dont understand what you are testing GPG or the build? Why don't you use gpg in settings.xml? The test JUnit47ParallelIT is performance test which means overloading CPU with other staff is not allowed. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

@Kristian Can we switch to other mail thread "surefire 2.19 hangs". On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n584795...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > @Stian Soiland-Reyes > I dont understand what you are testing GPG or the build? > Why don't you use gpg in

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

When I was using windows I remember that unlocked was my friend : http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/ Maybe there are others tools nowadays … The most important is to see which process is locking the files you are trying to delete to understand why it didn’t unlock them > On 08 Oct 2015, at

Re: Donation by the Apache Maven team: maven-eclipse-plugin

yes if nothing is specified in pluginManagement, maven will look into apache groupId firstly and in mojo groupId in a second time That’s why releasing a latest dummy version on apache side announcing the move may be a good idea for all people using it to invite us to specify the required entry

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

This was on linux. I'll try to diagnose later tonight K 8. okt. 2015 5.32 p.m. skrev "Arnaud Héritier" : > When I was using windows I remember that unlocked was my friend : > http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/ > Maybe there are others tools nowadays … > The most

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

2015-10-08 16:55 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > @Kristian > Can we switch to other mail thread "surefire 2.19 hangs". I dont necessarily think this is a good idea. We are discussing a candidate for a release, and I believe this is the appropriate place to discuss these

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1182 to track this issue. I analyzed the two thread dumps, and it would appear that the interesting bits are in the main process; the forked process appears to be completely idle. But why are there two streampumper threads in the main

Re: Maven Core Code - MavenModelMerger

Hi, ModelMerger is the parent class of every model mergers: AFAIK, it does not merge configuration of plugins if you want to test plugins configuration merge, you'll have to test either DefaultInheritanceAssembler.InheritanceModelMerger if you want to test inheritance merge or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Tree version 3.0

+1 On 8 October 2015 at 09:10, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12331490=Text=12317922=Create_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C8959a4aa0ef1e581a93c2903df89c21523603417%7Clin > > There are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

I identified the commit that caused the breakage, cb97ba70cb9ebe685f8f2a06e87b538795b5dd9b. I dont have further time to find the bug right now, but I suspect this should be enough to find the problem. Kristian 2015-10-08 19:09 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > I