Re: ARCHETYPE-494

Hi Petar, Nice work! I had a look, and I am a bit confused: is it about post-*generate*, ie after a project is generated from an archetype, or about post-*create*, ie after an archetype project is built from a sample project? See the workflow drawing I did to try to make that clear [1]

Re: CI core-it-maven

Hi, it seems core-its use m-dependency-p version 2.8: did you try with latest, ie 2.10? then m-dependency-p uses shared dependency-tree, which is told to be buggy sometimes: I never got real examples, nor time to dig into details to find where the result is not consistent, but it may explain

Re: to delete windows build ?

is there something to do on m-shade-p before releasing 2.4.3? because this fixed plugin version would perfectly fit the parent poms release I have to do... Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 18 décembre 2015 07:53:19 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : > As long as shade is not released and updated it will

Re: to delete windows build ?

Afaik it can be released any time. 18. des. 2015 16.38 skrev "Hervé BOUTEMY" : > is there something to do on m-shade-p before releasing 2.4.3? > because this fixed plugin version would perfectly fit the parent poms > release I > have to do... > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le

Re: ARCHETYPE-494

Hello Herve, thanks for the feedback. Indeed, looking at your email I realize the file naming is not the best. To answer your question - it is both post-create and post-generate. I'm developing a project which later on I make into an archetype using mvn archetype:create-from-project. This script

[GitHub] maven pull request: MNG-5837: Use a subshell, rather than the 'loc...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/50 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Modello Pull Request

Hi guys, I've been playing with the MavenXpp3Reader/MavenXpp3Writer lately. I managed to generate a pom.xml but my maven-rat-plugin failed because my generated pom.xml did not have the appropriate license header. Then I decided to add a new field in the MavenXpp3Writer called "fileComment". I

[GitHub] maven pull request: Fix MNG-5538

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/27 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: ARCHETYPE-494

yes, this sounds reasonable :) Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 18 décembre 2015 21:27:48 Petar Tahchiev a écrit : > Hello Herve, > > thanks for the feedback. Indeed, looking at your email I realize the file > naming is not the best. To answer your question - it is both post-create > and