Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

Op Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:28:24 +0100 schreef Igor Fedorenko : Good you agreed we don't need to add modulepath to MavenProject :-) I see few ways forward with java 9 module system support in maven * Convince jep authors to provide a mechanism to specify modulepath in a way

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5957] Configuration within lifecycle phas...

GitHub user mkrizmanic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/76 [MNG-5957] Configuration within lifecycle phase The lifecycle phase can be configured as a comma-separated list of plugins specified with the following data: ``` ::: ``` that are

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

Op Sun, 03 Jan 2016 22:55:48 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana : Do you want to use modulepath for dependencies -modulepath ../child2/target/classes, ../child3/target/classes instead of aggregating -classpath in javac? it is not about willing or not willing, it is a

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

wait a moment. javac must be backwards compatible, so why this won't work in Java9 javac -d ... -classpath .:child1:child2 Isn't module info a duplicate to POM? Why we must "copy" some libs to target/libs/, which would slow down the build, and add dependency arifacts to modulepath if they could

Re: Log4j Warning

Hi Arnaud, Thank you for the update. Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.5? Gary On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I fixed this in the branch : > https://github.com/apache/maven/commits/slf4j-log4j2.4 > The fix is in > >

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

javac is backwards compatible, it is extended with module support. Based on your questions I suggest to watch the videos of the sessions of JavaOne[1] This gave me a good picture of what jigsaw is and what it is not. Robert [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/j1/ Op Mon, 04 Jan

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

I was watching the videos but this migration leads to POM duplicates. That's what I am trying to tell you. I guess you are too in hurry with that. I don't see any reason why the Maven should even use modulepath and module-info. You should maybe write a simple page where and how the modulepath can

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request: maven-assembly-plugin has checkstyle i...

GitHub user nhojpatrick opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/77 maven-assembly-plugin has checkstyle issues failing build so fix them downloaded trunk and it won't build due to checkstyle failures, these patches should be in line with the other code

Re: Bumping Doxia (Sitetools) to 2.0?

Hi, Clearly, I already did some changes in Sitetool API. And what we are discussing in DOXIA-482 regarding comments in source markup not to translate into output markup is not what I would call "important". But for sure, as we discussed in some Jira issuees, if we want new versions of skins to

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016, at 03:18 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Op Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:28:24 +0100 schreef Igor Fedorenko > : > > > Good you agreed we don't need to add modulepath to MavenProject :-) > > > > I see few ways forward with java 9 module system support in maven > >

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request: maven-assembly-plugin has checkstyle i...

Github user nhojpatrick closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/77 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: Log4j Warning

Just because only 2.4 was available when I updated this feature branch few months ago. Le mardi 5 janvier 2016, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Hi Arnaud, > > Thank you for the update. > > Why not update the Log4j 2 dep from 2.4 to 2.5? > > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:46

Re: Log4j Warning

Hi Gary, I fixed this in the branch : https://github.com/apache/maven/commits/slf4j-log4j2.4 The fix is in maven-embedder/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/slf4j-configuration.properties ( https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/8cddea291c279130d437bcdf3337f16296558530 ) It is the update I

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5947] dependencyManagement import section...

Github user akacme commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/74#issuecomment-168756278 I've added POM-property-based configuration. Based on my current skill level embedding configuration somewhere else would require change in dependencies section for