[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #86: LinkMojo creates symbolic links to artifacts

GitHub user mkarg opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/86 LinkMojo creates symbolic links to artifacts This new mojo does the same as the copy mojo, but instead of really moving bytes around it simply creates symbolic links to the original storage

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Shared Utils 3.0.1

+1 Am 2016-05-29 um 00:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: Hi, We have solved 5 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20maven-shared-utils-3.0.1 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Shared Utils 3.0.1

+1 (non-PMC) 2016-06-01 22:11 GMT+03:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi, > > ony more PMC Vote needed ;-). > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz > On 5/29/16 12:23 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have solved 5 issues: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Shared Utils 3.0.1

Hi, ony more PMC Vote needed ;-). Kind regards Karl Heinz On 5/29/16 12:23 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We have solved 5 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20maven-shared-utils-3.0.1 There are still a couple of issues

Re: any ideas why 'Scanning for projects' is very slow ?

BTW: What also comes to my mind. Does the same happen if you ran that project as a freestyle project instead of Maven Job type (which i assume) ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 6/1/16 8:04 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, On 6/1/16 10:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote: Hi, I am trying to

Re: Maven Memory Consumption

Hi Manfred, On 6/1/16 12:24 AM, Manfred Moser wrote: I can feel your excitement coming through in the emails.. ;-) Of course I'm excited ;-) ...cause it's very important...I have had heard many customers saying they will not upgrade to newer versions of Maven exactly based on such

Re: any ideas why 'Scanning for projects' is very slow ?

Hi, On 6/1/16 10:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote: Hi, I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven is taking a very long time getting past the initial 'Scanning for projects' message. As you can see in below

[GitHub] maven-archetype issue #7: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for required pr...

Github user michael-o commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7 @mryan43 Looks way better now. Please squash, I will test and pull. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] maven-wagon pull request: Implementation for Secure FTP (FTPS protocol)

Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/22 @wiiitek What do you want to have updated in particular? We have

Re: any ideas why 'Scanning for projects' is very slow ?

Try: mvn --no-snapshot-updates Try: https://github.com/takari/maven-profiler On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven > under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: Fix import order in ArchetypeConfiuration

GitHub user mryan43 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10 Fix import order in ArchetypeConfiuration You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mryan43/maven-archetype fix-imports

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65342854 --- Diff: maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java --- @@ -19,12 +19,15 @@ * under the

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user mryan43 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65342161 --- Diff: maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java --- @@ -19,12 +19,15 @@ * under the

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65337809 --- Diff: maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java --- @@ -19,12 +19,15 @@ * under the

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user mryan43 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7 Hi @stain, I have integrated the feedback from @michael-o, let me know if you need anything else. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

any ideas why 'Scanning for projects' is very slow ?

Hi, I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven is taking a very long time getting past the initial 'Scanning for projects' message. As you can see in below snippet, more than half a minute elapses before the

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user mryan43 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65317792 --- Diff: maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java --- @@ -19,12 +19,15 @@ * under the

[GitHub] maven-archetype pull request: ARCHETYPE-487 Add input validation for require...

Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7 @stain I did already in April and wrote how to improve the PR. Nothing has happened. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on