[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #133: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to run te...

2016-11-24 Thread britter
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/133 @Tibor17 see #135 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishe

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #135: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to...

2016-11-24 Thread britter
GitHub user britter opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/135 SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to run tests against multiple JUnit versions First proposal to run tests against multiple JUnit versions. I implemented an Enum representing

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #133: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to...

2016-11-24 Thread britter
Github user britter closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/133 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featur

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #133: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to run te...

2016-11-24 Thread britter
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/133 Yes sorry, I opened the PR for the wrong branch. Will recreate. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #110: SUREFIRE-1216: TEST-*.xml files generated by Sure...

2016-11-24 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/110 @justinharringa Yes fixing the critical issues is never ending story. I will release 2.19.2 and 2.19.3 later. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #133: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to run te...

2016-11-24 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/133 @britter >If this i going into the right direction, we can create a parent pom file with the profiles and adopt this to more of the existing tests. Activating Maven profiles in IT was

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #133: SUREFIRE-1307: Provide a convenient way to run te...

2016-11-24 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/133 @britter Here in GitHub are a lots of commits. Which one should I have a look? It seems you merged origin/master from junit5 branch to master again. --- If your project is set up for it

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #132: SUREFIRE-1306: JUnit4RerunFailingTestsIT does not...

2016-11-24 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/132 @britter The JUnit should be stable. Do you see in stacktrace why it fails with 4.7? Is it our problem or JUnit problem? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e

Re: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wagon-windows - No Maven

2016-11-24 Thread Dan Tran
Thank you!!! -Dan On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > on WIndows nodes, you must use "Maven 3.0.5 (WIndows)" Maven: see INFRA > Jenkins documentation [1] on nodes names, JDK, Ant, Maven. It was made > during > migration of nodes to Puppet to better manage consistency across

Re: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wagon-windows - No Maven

2016-11-24 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
on WIndows nodes, you must use "Maven 3.0.5 (WIndows)" Maven: see INFRA Jenkins documentation [1] on nodes names, JDK, Ant, Maven. It was made during migration of nodes to Puppet to better manage consistency across nodes I just changed the job config Regards, Hervé [1] https://cwiki.apache.o

Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

2016-11-24 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, Robert Scholte schrieb am Do., 24. Nov. 2016 um 20:44 Uhr: > Hi Benedikt, > > I noticed a new thread on the jigsaw mailinglist[1]. > It is close related to the issue I have: you don't want to "patch" java > with arguments just to allow split packages for certain modules. I really > hope t

Re: [SUREFIRE] Issues with classpath and module path

2016-11-24 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Benedikt, I noticed a new thread on the jigsaw mailinglist[1]. It is close related to the issue I have: you don't want to "patch" java with arguments just to allow split packages for certain modules. I really hope that by chaining classloaders we can prevent this. Robert [1] http://ma

Re: MRESOURCES-231

2016-11-24 Thread Dan Tran
it is the only way to represent empty string under XML -Dan On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Christian Schulte wrote: > Am 11/24/16 um 02:40 schrieb Dan Tran: > > ∅ ? > > That is working indeed! Thanks. Is this something official - the way to > go - I can tell the reporter of the issue? > >

Re: MRESOURCES-231

2016-11-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 11/24/16 um 02:40 schrieb Dan Tran: > ∅ ? That is working indeed! Thanks. Is this something official - the way to go - I can tell the reporter of the issue? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For addit