Pls participate in the vote and test.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 24 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12340297
>
> There are 101 issues left in JIRA:
>
On Wed 13 Sep 2017 at 23:30, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote:
>
> Calling -2 for vote if not too late.
>
> Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did have
> true for the jasmine-maven-plugin which we don't
> actually
On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Calling -2 for vote if not too late.
Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did have
`true` for the `jasmine-maven-plugin` which we don't
actually need. Removing that from the mojo definition and running my build with
the
Calling -2 for vote if not too late.
Have git bisected from 3.5.0 to HEAD and found the commit that introduced the
behaviour:
ec629f7d511eb910b4e80112a9fbe85ed8786f10 is the first bad commit
commit ec629f7d511eb910b4e80112a9fbe85ed8786f10
Author: Igor Fedorenko
Date:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
-
To
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Stephane Nicoll, Oliver Lamy, Harvé Boutemy,
Anders Hammar, Tibor Digana, Karl Heinz Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi,
here is my +1.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 09/09/17 14:34, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
We solved 7 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227=12341254
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
I will cancel the VOTE based on found issues..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 09/09/17 15:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
this is the VOTE for the first public release for Maven JMod Plugin...
We solved 1 issues:
Hi Robert,
On 11/09/17 21:11, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
isn't it weird that jmod:create has parameters for classpath and
modulepath?
why not start using the dependencies as specified in the pom?
and the plugin shouldn't use artifactId as default for the modulename.
Current best practice is
+1 non-binding, tried with OpenJDK Java 8, Linux x86_64, tried on a
bunch of internal projects, non-forking mode but with --threads 2, all
junit tests, about 3k in total, tried failsafe plugin for arquillian
tests, all looks right
did not test exotic testing modes nor site plugin report
Thanks
+1 non-binding
I tested with OpenJDK Java 8 on Linux x86_64 with a variety of
projects. Everything looks good, the only new behavior I'm seeing is a
warning:
[WARNING] The project <> uses prerequisites which is
only intended for maven-plugin projects but not for non maven-plugin
projects. For
Just received the confirmation that netbeans uses the cli, so there should be
no issue there.
Robert
Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone.
Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: Stephen Connolly
Datum: 13-09-17 10:05 (GMT+01:00) Aan:
Maven
Just received the confirmation that netbeans uses the cli, so there should be
no issue there.
Robert
Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone.
Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: Stephen Connolly
Datum: 13-09-17 10:05 (GMT+01:00) Aan:
Maven
Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ?
I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more bugs than I add new ones
I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it too
I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our maven core with the Evil
Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it
+1 non binding, works with my production build and I can only test with
snapshot
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Thomas Collignon
wrote:
> Hello
>
> +1 for me
>
> 2017-09-12 10:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana :
>
> > Hi Dan,
> > Yes you can use
On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Have we got any feedback
On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
> >
>
> I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
>
I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to ping them
directly. I can contact Fred Bricon.
/Anders
>
> On Mon 11 Sep
Hello
+1 for me
2017-09-12 10:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi Dan,
> Yes you can use such version. The URL for snapshots is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
> >
+1 - go for it.
2017-09-13 9:04 GMT+03:00 Grzegorz Grzybek :
> Hello
>
> +1 (non-binding) - tested Fuse/Karaf/OSGi projects
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> 2017-09-13 8:00 GMT+02:00 Thomas Collignon :
>
> > Hello
> >
> > +1 for me
> >
> >
Hello
+1 (non-binding) - tested Fuse/Karaf/OSGi projects
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
2017-09-13 8:00 GMT+02:00 Thomas Collignon :
> Hello
>
> +1 for me
>
> 2017-09-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Stephen Connolly com
> >:
>
> > Have we got any feedback
Hello
+1 for me
2017-09-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Stephen Connolly :
> Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
>
> On Mon 11 Sep 2017 at 22:57, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> > just for the records: it is Windows + Git Bash
22 matches
Mail list logo