Hi,
yes, this will require a xhtml5 Doxia sink
since each skin defines a site template as direct html source (without Doxia
interaction), the maven-site-plugin switch from xhtml to xhtml5 would have to
be done on configuration from the skin: looks like a good addition to skin
model [1]
here it is, now Maven site and Doxia sub-site are published by Jenkins
CMS is not used any more
We'll just need to move components reference documentation out of the CMS svn
space: I'll do it later with infra
now, I'll work on GitBox migration
If someone can write a Jenkinsfile, this would be
Hi all,
According to the docs at
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/creating-content.html
"Note that Doxia also supports several output formats, the site plugin only
creates XHTML”.
I would like the maven-site-plugin to have the option to output HTML5 (or
XHTML5 to
FYI, switch is happening currently, I'm on HipChat with infra
then CMS does not have any effect now: this will be Jenkins job (or manual
build)
please don't try to publish anything for now: I'll tell once everything is
stabilized
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 13 avril 2018, 18:15:21 CEST Karl
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven Clean Plugin Version 3.1.0.
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/
Important Note:
* Maven 3.X only
* JDK 7 minimum requirement
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
Mark,
Your project on mine machine takes on average 2.5 second and that is
also doing a clean package each time, not just package.
Spec:
MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Late 2013)
Processor 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Disk 512GB SSD
$ java -version
java version "9.0.4"
This is interesting discussion and so I decided to build your project with
Java 9 and Maven 3.5.3.
Completed within 1.5 sec.
I have noticed that Maven 3.3.9 was slower, cca 2.5 sec.
mvn -V test
Apache Maven 3.5.3 (3383c37e1f9e9b3bc3df5050c29c8aff9f295297;
2018-02-24T20:49:05+01:00)
Maven home:
On 2018-04-14T09:02:55 +
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maven is not the fastest, but in your case it sounds unusual slow. What are
> your machine specs? Any SSD? Do you happen to have a on-access malware
> scanner active? They react very bad to Java scanning
Hello,
Maven is not the fastest, but in your case it sounds unusual slow. What are
your machine specs? Any SSD? Do you happen to have a on-access malware scanner
active? They react very bad to Java scanning large number of JAR files.
Gruss
Bernd
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
Hi Plamen,
On 14/04/18 08:50, Plamen Totev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to prepare a release for Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 [1] and
Plexus IO 3.0.1[2]. There are a couple of bug fixes and support for
modular JAR archive is introduced. If there are no objections on the
opened pull requests I'll merge
Sorry, the correct Plexus Archiver version is 3.6.0
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Plamen Totev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to prepare a release for Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 [1] and
> Plexus IO 3.0.1[2]. There are a couple of bug fixes and support for
> modular JAR
Hi,
I would like to prepare a release for Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 [1] and
Plexus IO 3.0.1[2]. There are a couple of bug fixes and support for
modular JAR archive is introduced. If there are no objections on the
opened pull requests I'll merge them. Also I'll update the
dependencies. But that is far
12 matches
Mail list logo