pt., 5 sty 2024 o 16:17 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My summary for this discussion:
> >
> > No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
> > Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé
I would like to kindly remember that this thread is not about the JDK
version, if we need such discussion we should start a new thread.
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 18:22 Karl Heinz Marbaise
napisał(a):
> On 05.01.24 17:02, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> >>
Hi,
This is a valid error but if you want to see it you need to enable HTTP
frames.
For the record the error returns a HTML response with this content: *Cannot
find a matching staging profile*.
If you want to check them out it depends a bit of your maven version but
for 3.9 you just comment the
On 2024/01/04 14:00:08 tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When deploying artifacts to Nexus repository, 400 Bad Request can be
> one of the most confusing error code. See [1] as an example.
>
> Sonatype has a page to document some common causes of 400 Bad Request
> [2]. But I wonder if we can return an
On 05.01.24 17:02, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
...
On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
This
On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> ...
> On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> >> +1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
> >> minimum runtime requirement..
> >
> > This reminds me of
...
On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
This reminds me of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/10902 and it
provides very good
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> +1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
> minimum runtime requirement..
This reminds me of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/10902 and it
provides very good reasons why not to do it. Maven is a low level
On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My summary for this discussion:
>
> No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
> Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé Boutemy
>
> Michael Osipov - had a questions but I assume that is
Hi,
I'm the same opinion to upgrade to the most recent Maven 3.X version..
for the plugins... +1 (but I'm ok also to use Maven 3.6.3 as minimum)..
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 31.12.23
Hi,
My summary for this discussion:
No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé Boutemy
Michael Osipov - had a questions but I assume that is no -1 from him
So:
I would like to not categorize cora and not
11 matches
Mail list logo
