Please don't use the version in the GAV as marketing, this will be
crazy-making for users IMO, especially if I have to look inside a jar to
figure out what my expectations should be regarding semantic versioning.
My view is that the user visible jar file name containing the version
should set
The current title of the ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINVOKER-355 does not mention what is
being updated. Amusing to me :-p since you write about it here ;-)
Gary
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, 2:45 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin version
au> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le dim. 24 mars 2024 à 18:44, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As long as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-143 is in
&
Hi All,
As long as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-143 is in
play, Commons will stay on a pre-3.3.0 version.
I re-read the comments, I still don't know what we can do in Commons
to address this as this feels like some deep Maven Magic.
Gary
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 11:48 AM Hervé
The one I use the most from the command line is "tree" (
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/tree-mojo.html)
I wish I could say "ignore test scope" to help me understand my runtime
dependencies better.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, 12:06 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
What's wrong with using a changes.xml and the plug in? You have full
control.
Gary
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 7:25 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:07 PM Andres Almiray wrote:
> >
> > First, I’d suggest following a commit message convention. You may define
> your own or
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 2:56 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2024-03-08 um 20:51 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > IMO, the old version + 0.10 is a recipe for confusion and explanations
> for
> > this and that exception.
>
> I totally agree with you, that is a horrible compromise. D
IMO, the old version + 0.10 is a recipe for confusion and explanations for
this and that exception.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 2:40 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Maarten,
>
> that would need a LOT of work, from maven plugin tools, IDEs and ALL the
> stuff that _assumes_ that a plugin artifactId
One issue from a non-Maven dev (me) is that I have no idea what is a
Maven "core" plugin vs. not. I would make that obvious for users, and
no, the "maven-" prefix does not make it obvious:
maven-clean-plugin -> maven-core-clean-plugin or maven4-core-clean-plugin
I'm also not sure the "plugin"
+1
Also good idea to remind folks to stay focused in a vote thread.
Gary
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 2:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:33 AM Matthias Bünger
wrote:
>
> (I'm neither a Maven core or plugin maintainer)
>
> I don't like such annotations as in my opinion, they save you nothing,
> but bring an addional dependency and problems with the tools that
> (don't) support (only a specific version of)
à 00 h 37, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > I have no use for JPMS today, I just don't want it to get in the way,
> > which is impossible since there is no --dont-bother-me-jpms flag...
> >
> That option exists at the level of the proposed Maven 4 API and has a
> JUnit
I have no use for JPMS today, I just don't want it to get in the way, which
is impossible since there is no --dont-bother-me-jpms flag...
Gary
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024, 6:34 PM Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Le 2024-02-06 à 16 h 11, Hunter C Payne a écrit
e the JDK 8 Maven 3 until they
> > lose
> > > > interest. This already works well for other projects.
> > > >
> > > > Even if no one stands up for volunteering: Maven 3 will continue to
> > work
> > > > just fine, even after releases o
An interesting question for me is whether we need to think about companies
that pay for old JDK support and how that affects our support for these old
JDKs.
Gary
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 4:28 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
Based on my experience, I think we (FOSS developers) can create our own
momentum by "simply" creating an EOL schedule. I have seen this EOL aspect
motivate the move away from Jetty 9 for example. Since Maven 4 is not out,
there is nothing to EOL in Maven 3 land unless you want to say that only
FWIW, I work for a large company and our business unit just switched to
Java 17 after eons on Java 8. I think requiring Java 17 or 21 to run Maven
is fine. The existing tooling supports generating Java 8 binaries for those
who need it.
Gary
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 9:01 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
The first thing I do when I see issues like this is check
www.githubstatus.com
Gary
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024, 7:31 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> If anyone has a minute to take a look. I see various failures on
> different dependabot PRs that have nothing to do with their content.
> E.g.
>
>
FWIW, we are users or Dependabot over at Apache Commons, so yes please.
Gary
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 3:15 AM Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> +1
>
> We should maintain GitHub releases notes, last is for 3.2.2
> Now we have outdated info which can be confusing for users.
> So we should be consistent -
FWIW, at work, we just went from Java 8 to 17, and we are a pretty
conservative organization.
Gary
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023, 10:44 AM Jorge Solórzano wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here, why would anyone update Maven plugins in a project
> and NOT update Maven Core? Older versions of Maven are EOL,
FYI: Somethings to watch out for based on testing Commons:
- Double toString() is less precise
- Odd differences in printing/parsing timestamps/times (unresolved so
far, see Commons ML)
Gary
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 9:23 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> JDK 21 is now the both the latest and
, meaning, that
> IMHO we should not push new features into 3 anymore (similarly in resolver,
> all the new features like HTTP/2 are "parked" for resolver 2 [to be used
> with Maven 4]). I did not say "no more 3.x releases", just wanted to
> emphasize the "shift of
>From the peanut gallery, it feels odd to call anything 3.x in maintenance
mode when there is not a 4.0.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 3:08 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This release completes the main goals of Maven 3.9.x lineage, among
> others moving to Java 8 and transition to
FWIW, I don't have an issue with XML in general, just the style we use.
An as aside, I find it amusing to watch the JSON folks reinvent each and
every wheel that XML has been using for decades.
Gary
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 10:34 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> @Gary Gregory thing is that
tion-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 14:58, Guillaume Nodet a écrit
> :
>
> > Not directly, but a simple extension could allow that...
> >
> > Le mar. 22 août 2023 à 12:33, Gary Gregory a
> > écrit :
> >
I should have said "primitive" attributes plus Strings (and maybe
Durations).
Gary
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 8:03 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:33 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> ="2.13.0" ... />
> >
> > In general, I
Hi all,
Would any of these changes allow me to write my POM's XML dependencies in a
single element where the GID, AID, and version are attributes (and not
child elements)?
In general, I want the XML to more OO, where XML elements are objects and
attributes are, well, attributes.
Gary
On Tue,
Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 21 août 20
OS name: "mac os x", version: "13.5", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
Gary
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:24 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Are there any plans for getting plugins to build with JPMS? For
> example, trying to generate a module description
Are there any plans for getting plugins to build with JPMS? For
example, trying to generate a module description with the Moditect
plugin fails for the Commons commons-build-plugin:
Error: Modules maven.model and maven.model.builder export package
org.apache.maven.model.merge to module
OURCES-143
TY!
Gary
>
> Thanks,
> Konrad
>
>
>
>
> > On 15. Aug 2023, at 19:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:42 PM Michael Osipov > <mailto:micha...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 2023-08-15 um 14:57 schri
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:42 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Am 2023-08-15 um 14:57 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In Commons Parent [1], we want to configure child POMs to build both
> > source and test sources, so we say (among other things):
> >
&
Hi All,
In Commons Parent [1], we want to configure child POMs to build both
source and test sources, so we say (among other things):
maven-source-plugin
create-source-jar
jar-no-fork
test-jar-no-fork
Or a Set.
Gary
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 11:37 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sounds like a Java Map implementation is used that does not preserve
> insertion order.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 11:03 AM Tamás Cservenák
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are righ
eir ordering is different?
>
>
>
> T
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 15:28 Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Maybe figuring out the exact difference between the jars will give you a
> > hint?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 9:19 AM Tamás
Maybe figuring out the exact difference between the jars will give you a
hint?
Gary
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 9:19 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Sure,
>
> Will do that, thanks.
>
> What I don't understand is how I got 2 different jars in the first place,
> as i did not release twice (nor build from
Hi all,
Is it worth including more detailed information in the release notes to
short circuit questions or concerns like this one?
I can't recall the last time I hear someone complaining about releasing too
soon ;-) AFAIAC, if any bug fix is made available in a release, that's a
good thing. I'm
Playing a bit of devil's advocate here: while I've not used it, there is a
maven polyglot plugin that IIRC let's you author your POM in other formats.
But yeah, XML can be a pain but XML Schema is super handy in tooling and
editors. In the meantime, JSON is just reinventing the wheel...
Gary
On
Note that Apache Commons Compress supports pack200.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 09:52 Delany wrote:
> Hi Jeremy. We're talking about the possibility of a drop-in replacement.
> But what you're suggesting requires alterations to the code, and having
> struggled with JAXB and its many unofficial
I'm having trouble reading this email, hang on, let me adjust the rabbit
ears on my black and white television... ah better now. I'm sorry what were
you saying? :-)
Gary
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, 07:22 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 10:59 AM Delany wrote:
> >
> > I think the
I claim it is not wasteful to run unit tests on Java 8, 11, and 17, which
usually is the longest and most resource intensive part of a build.
How would you do that were it not for a GitHub matrix?
Gary
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023, 08:01 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> From recent discussions I
(Non-binding chatter) I'm ok with Java 17 but since M4 feels like it's not
around the corner, why not go for Java 21-EA and possibly learn even more
cool tech. Surely Java 21 which is an LTS version will be released as GA
before M4.
Gary
On Wed, May 31, 2023, 04:30 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
GH has the notion of "projects". Can't we use that?
Gary
On Mon, May 29, 2023, 09:50 Christoph Läubrich wrote:
> I must confess "another central project" do not feels right:
>
> 1) there already is a "central" one everyone can easily find if
> searching for "maven github":
So much spam got into jira, it had to be locked down. You should see the
junk I mod out of the Xalan lists...
Gary
On Sat, May 27, 2023, 06:55 Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 6:11 AM Tamás Cservenák
> wrote:
>
> > In general, my intention with bringing up this on Slack
How does StackOverflow fit in if at all? Any pros and cons to share?
Gary
On Sat, May 27, 2023, 06:43 tison wrote:
> > single point of entrance
>
> One last comment - it's a maintainer strategy to reduce the burden of
> monitoring multiple channels, and users generally gather to where their
>
Ah, I was misled by the PR title then. Thank you for the clarification!
Gary
On Sat, May 20, 2023, 12:53 Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Please don't change the default behavior to exclude test sources!
> >
Please don't change the default behavior to exclude test sources!
Non-binding -1 from me.
Some tests serve as nice examples. I also want to enforce checkstyle for PR
sources consistently whether the changes are in main or test.
Please don't accepting this as is and make me edit dozens and dozens
>From this user's POV, I feel these warning force me to spin my wheels: If I
have old plugins I can update their versions, and then I still get the
warnings, none of which I can do anything about. I can do something about
compiler warnings, I can do nothing about these.
I am left to explain up
Non-binding +1
I tested git master with Apache Commons BCEL.
Gary
On Mon, May 1, 2023, 11:45 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 20 on *nix
>
> notice that using a LTS JDK would be better for such a release
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> On
The abundance of Maven warnings is indeed annoying, but it seems like
normal growing pains while migration to new versions of plugins is in
progress ;-) which is a good thing overall IMO.
Gary
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023, 09:19 Konrad Windszus wrote:
> I agree with that. For me a new ASF parent
Yes please, I get a raised eyebrow when a surefire and failsafe M version
is reviewed in a PR...
Gary
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023, 07:47 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 9:36 AM Slawomir Jaranowski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to
This echoes IMO what a higher level app (Maven in this case) should do,
tell me when something unusual happens, like when something is taking a
long time. For us Windows users, the Explorer UI only pops up its progress
dialog when you are copying "a lot" or its taking "a long time", otherwise
it
Yeah, this is tricky IMO because I would rather know that something has
started and is taking a long time rather than staring at an apparently hung
console.
I think it is fine as it is now and --no-transfer-progress is helpful and
also -ntp work the same? AFK.
Gary
Gary
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023,
It seems to me that we need a separate EOL setting that is Maven specific,
just like git has a bunch of settings like autocrlf.
Gary
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 08:02 Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> IMHO in 2023 the problem is that anything relies on a system dependent
> line.separator instead of
What happens if you try Java 8 and 11 and nothing else changes?
Gary
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 02:51 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I am seeing this problem
>
> This test Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashesToTestsIT.test is
> consistently failing on my laptop.
> I am running on JDK17 on Mac ARM
> Apache
Is there something I can unzip and test?
Gary
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022, 08:17 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Maven 3.8.7 is almost complete, a few regressions have been addressed.
>
> I'll leave people this business week to work/discuss on potential issues
> for 3.8.x. My plan is to start the
Where can we read about the expected level of compatibility with Maven 3?
TY!
Gary
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 08:19 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a release candidate at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1835
>
> Source distributions:
>
>
Nice!
Gary
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, 14:31 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> That's done in the v4 api.
>
> Le mer. 23 nov. 2022 à 19:37, Christoph Läubrich a
> écrit :
>
> > Currently maven is bound to the Java File API, e.g.
> >
> > org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject.getBasedir()
> >
I really like that Maven provides the option to build a site, no matter
what technological relics it uses.
I do see two site use cases that are worth teasing out:
I want to build and publish a site for public consumption.
I want a local folder full of HTML reports for my review as a developer.
As much as I dislike JPMS, maybe Maven 4 should migrate to Java 9 or 11 and
adopt JPMS to better define its public APIs.
Gary
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022, 05:06 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Yes, to define rules is quite easy, but to make our users to obey them is
> tricky :D
>
> In general, I guess, we
What countries are those BTW?
Gary
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022, 21:52 Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022, 20:05 Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 10:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >
>> > FYI, and FWIW, Log4j is planning on swit
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022, 20:05 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 10:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > FYI, and FWIW, Log4j is planning on switch from Jira to GitHub for
> issues,
> > and release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3628
> >
FYI, and FWIW, Log4j is planning on switch from Jira to GitHub for issues,
and release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3628
Gary
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022, 19:16 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> well I just see GH release note as a cherry on the cake.
> as long as the rest is done.
> Just
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022, 09:09 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> After log4shell last year, I no longer have any patience for third
> party logging libraries, full stop.
>
Uh? CVEs have occurred in all types of libraries, there is nothing about
logging that makes it more CVE-prone. You might as well
And let's not forget that Log4j also is a facade API:
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/api-separation.html
Gary
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, 06:56 Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start ( again :-) ) a discussion about logging in Maven plugins.
>
> First I agree that plugin
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 2:40 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> IMO A failed release should not burn an external facing version
> number. If it does, then the release process is flawed and needs to be
> fixed.
>
Big old +1 on that! :-)
Gary
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:05 AM Slawomir
Go for it :-)
Gary
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022, 15:44 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Given maven and the resolver have upgraded their minimum JDK requirement to
> 1.8, I think it makes sense to raise it globally in the parent pom.
>
> Any objections ?
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
For my own 2c, all the extra spacing drives me bananas.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, 09:26 Björn Raupach wrote:
> As someone who has just started opening some PRs for Maven, I would
> appreciate a more common Java Code Style.
>
> Not saying the style is bad, it is just confusing. Especially the
there are already forks from the tag active anywhere.
> > > But yes, bumping the version is what we used to do in this case.
> > >
> > > - Ben
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Sa., 15. Okt. 2022 um 00:31 Uhr schrieb Guillaume Nodet <
> > > gno...@apac
Why are you bumping the version if it failed?
Gary
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 18:13 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Just FYI, I've attempted to release 4.0.0-alpha-1, but it failed. I'll try
> to cut another version once the problems are resolved. So 4.0.0-alpha-1 is
> a burnt version and next attempt
Non-binding +1 from me.
Gary
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 12:23 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Related to the discussion about automatically formatting and sorting
> imports, I think it would be nice, given the big reformat commits if those
> PRs are to be merged, to eventually discuss some changes to
Does Maven and it's own plugins use JApiCmp or any tool to detect binary
compatibility breaks?
Gary
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 06:53 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> It should not break, but if it does, we did something wrong.
>
> The new API will coexist with old stuff, so in essence Maven 3
Hi Maven,
Any chance of finishing up RAT 0.15 soon?
Gary
Right, all Commons components (over 20) use the plugin to generate their
respective Jira pages.
Gary
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022, 12:55 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> The Apache Commons Project Sites use the jira integration, the plugin
> works in principle, but does not support paging.
>
>
FWIW, I agree with Ralph wholeheartedly.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022, 15:31 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Some statistics below. I think you are being very optimistic about how
> fast people will adopt JDK 17. If it follows the trends for Java 8 and 11 I
> would put money on betting it won’t be the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 10:04 AM Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:22 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > It looks like the Apache RAT plugin tries to validate the
> > .gitattributes file (in contrast to excluding .gitignore).
> >
> > Is tha
It looks like the Apache RAT plugin tries to validate the
.gitattributes file (in contrast to excluding .gitignore).
Is that an issue to be fixed or documented?
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 7:04 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Am 2022-07-17 um 13:02 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > (Sorry for the top post) So it sounds like the simplest from a user's POV
> > is to wait for JDepend 2.1.
>
> Technically yes, but given the requirements I have depic
(Sorry for the top post) So it sounds like the simplest from a user's POV
is to wait for JDepend 2.1.
Gary
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022, 16:21 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Gary,
>
> went through. It is jdepend-maven-plugin only. With:
> > D:\Entwicklung\Projekte\commons-dbcp [master ≡ +0 ~1 -0 !]> git diff
Hi all,
The current version seems to be 3.2.1 but the site says 3.2.0.
Gary
s.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode
(Launcher.java:406)
at org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main
(Launcher.java:347)
Can this be fixed in a new site plugin release?
Is the JDepend plugin dead and should be in the attic? No releases since 2014.
Gary
>
> (package was needed as then japicmp would fail)
>
>
Hi All,
I'm looking for help in how to remedy an AbstractMethodError at
org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument
Running:
git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-dbcp.git
cd commons-dbcp
maven clean site -DskipTests
Any thoughts?
[INFO]
It can take a few hours to sync up...
Gary
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 16:46 Dan Tran wrote:
> Thanks for releasing this needed release
>
> looks like it is slow to appear at maven central? [1]
>
> -D
>
> [1] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022
ace the value (collection?)
> with a new one and not modify the actual one. What do you think?
>
> Regards
>
> > Le 19 mai 2022 à 13:23, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > Bad idea unless you can look at each call site and _guarantee_ that you
> > want an immutable Collec
Bad idea unless you can look at each call site and _guarantee_ that you
want an immutable Collection instead of a mutable one... which I do not see
how you can do especially once a Collection escapes an API. Unless you're
ok with breaking behavioral compatibility...
Gary
On Thu, May 19, 2022,
Hi all,
I am not sure which component broke binary compatibility for the Apache RAT
plugin, so I am emailing here. This happens in Apache Commons Parent git
master with Maven 3.8.5 running the default mvn goal for our POM:
(If my mailer uglies this up, it is also here
FWIW, from my POV milestones are confusing because there is no roadmap for
what the milestones ahead are, unlike what Eclipse usually does for
example. Instead from this user's POV milestones feel like static snapshots
without expectations set, unlike an alpha or a beta which most people have
an
Can someone explain the M release meaning? Is it an alpha release? A beta
version? Is it production ready? Does it depend on the plugin (please say
no)?
Gary
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022, 07:49 Samuel Le Berrigaud wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'd just like to get an idea of when a potential 3.0.0-M6 of
Also note that in log4j 2.17.2 that was released a few days ago, I added
many improvements to the log4j-1.2-api module which aims to provide
compatibility with 1.2.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, 08:37 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> All of the (known) remaining log4j1.x security bugs (none of which are
Do note that reload4j is not 100% compatible with log4j 1.2.17, code has
just be deleted to "fix" some CVEs.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, 08:37 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> All of the (known) remaining log4j1.x security bugs (none of which are as
> severe as log4shell) are fixed in reload4j 1.2.18+.
Hi Michael,
I'm looking for an intersection where Maven and this CFF plugin can be made
to work together, I don't know where that is. I'd be willing to offer a PR
here or there but there would need to be agreement on what the
solution would be.
Gary
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022, 04:48 Michael Osipov
Hi All:
While researching GitHub's citation support [1], I found that there is a
plugin to convert a pom.xml into a CFF file [2]. I'd like to generate a CFF
file for Apache Commons Components like Commons Lang, Commons IO, and so
on. This plugin works but does not generate a license field [3]
Congrats! :-)
Gary
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 14:53 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote has passed with the following result:
>
> +1: Hervé Boutemy, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Romain Manni-Bucau, Michael
> Osipov, Tamás Cservenák, Jason van Zyl, Arnaud Héritier
>
> PMC quorum: reached
>
> I will
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2022-01-08 um 15:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > Ok,
> > I see now.
> >
> > But the problem still exists ...
> > m-p-p can not be used with Nexus staging maven plugin
> >
> > Looking into nexus staging plugin [1] I'm afraid that
FWIW, I plan on doing the same for most Apache Commons components.
Gary
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021, 11:22 Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> +1 to drop Travis, for multiple reasons
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:52 AM Slawomir Jaranowski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As the primary CI environment we use
At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone versions in our
builds. What is preventing the next version from being "3.0.0", no "M". I
thought I read here a while back that the code was production ready.
Gary
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Sounds good.
> I'd
The parsers I've seen don't "prevent" XI, you have to enable the feature;
note that some folks don't like DTD processing and XI for security reasons.
Gary
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, 09:17 Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Almost everything is in the subject: any reason our pom parser prevents
At first glance, I can't tell if my projects would benefit from this plugin
or not. It seems to me the readme assumes to much domain knowledge.
Gary
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 12:13 Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have created maven-gh-actions-shared [1] with the first shared workflow.
> I
gt; but it is discussion for another place, here I only point it
>
>
> sob., 23 paź 2021 o 22:51 Gary Gregory
> napisał(a):
>
> > HI All:
> >
> > I discovered a regression this morning that prevents me from creating
> > a release candidate for Apache Commons CLI:
&
HI All:
I discovered a regression this morning that prevents me from creating
a release candidate for Apache Commons CLI:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7316
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/601
May this be included for 3.8.4 please?
Gary
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 3:48 PM Falko
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
