Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

+1 non-binding, tried with OpenJDK Java 8, Linux x86_64, tried on a bunch of internal projects, non-forking mode but with --threads 2, all junit tests, about 3k in total, tried failsafe plugin for arquillian tests, all looks right did not test exotic testing modes nor site plugin report Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

+1 non-binding I tested with OpenJDK Java 8 on Linux x86_64 with a variety of projects. Everything looks good, the only new behavior I'm seeing is a warning: [WARNING] The project <> uses prerequisites which is only intended for maven-plugin projects but not for non maven-plugin projects. For

Re: Improvements to analyze goal of maven-dependency-plugin

Yah, looks great! Would use it! On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2017-06-14T11:51:46 + > Jonathan Haber wrote: >> Here an is example of the output before and after: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 1.6

Yaay! :) Nice job On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-11-07 um 20:39 schrieb jieryn: >> >> https://github.com/jieryn/fluido-fail > > > Thanks, that was fast. I am able to reproduce the issue and found quickly >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 1.6

https://github.com/jieryn/fluido-fail On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-11-07 um 17:41 schrieb jieryn: >> >> I'm trying to test out the skin, thanks for making those updates! >> >> I'm hitting a migration issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 1.6

I'm trying to test out the skin, thanks for making those updates! I'm hitting a migration issue that I do not find a description/ resolution on the site: Caused by: org.apache.maven.doxia.siterenderer.RendererException: Cannot use skin: has 1.7.1 Doxia Sitetools prerequisite, but current is 1.7

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.6

+1 non-binding Tested with several projects, including inherited site.xml and inherited pages. site:attach-descriptor, site:jar, site:run Java 8, Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT, Fluido Skin 1.5 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Alix Lourme wrote: > +1 > > 2016-11-06 20:42 GMT+01:00

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

Hi, I don't think we agree at all on most of this stuff, fine, I won't press it. However... On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > First of all, I'd like the error message to change. I still don't know to > this day what it means. Second, if Maven

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

the arquillian:bom and arquillian-transaction:bom? It's not clear.. I think this bom is useful for 1-page tutorials, but is not correct for any serious project. On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:50 PM, ji

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

I reported this for Arquillian, earlier... https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201608.mbox/%3CCAArU9ia0C7bdvHEMTX3BU%3DChnrb-_chtw8N3xokvKO2_Rnzf1A%40mail.gmail.com%3E Arquillian also follows that style of multiple type=bom concentrators which are recommended practice. Even though

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.0.0

Tested with Java 8, Maven 3.4.0-SNAP, a half dozen projects with normal usage, nothing exotic. +1 non-binding On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 32 issues: >

Re: Preleminary Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT Testing (Take 3)

https://github.com/jieryn/maven-3.4.0-testing On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:37 AM, jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, here is an example project boiled down to the minimum. The > arquillian module demonstrates the problem, and it is a commonly > recommended way by RedHat JBo

Re: Preleminary Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT Testing (Take 3)

'org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-server:jar' into model 'com.acme:arquillian:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT' @ '/home/jieryn/workspaces/maven-3.4.0-testing/arquillian/pom.xml' ('42 : 25, org.jboss.arquillian.selenium:selenium-bom:2.53.0 /home/jieryn/.m2/repository/org/jboss/arquillian/selenium/selenium-bom/2.53.0/selenium-bom-2.53.0.pom

Re: Preleminary Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT Testing (Take 3)

lease report... > > Many thanks for your help... > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/ > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 19/08/16 05:11, jieryn wrote: >> >> Sorry I am so late to this party. >> >> I find that

Re: Preleminary Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT Testing (Take 3)

Sorry I am so late to this party. I find that Apache Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT (90f26c279af9738735be8f84f60dcf21b6244e24; 2016-07-22T11:23:04-04:00) prefers .mvn/maven.config options instead of specifically listed parameters. This is surprising to me. I expect the .mvn/maven.config options to be

Re: Discussion: Resource-only artifacts

https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ You bundle up your resources and then you can unbundle them whenever you want. Works nice for a lot of shared resources. Licenses, static code analysis configurations, velocity templates, etc etc etc. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:20

Re: colorized Maven output

Also, to get Jenkins displaying ANSI escape codes for color you can install https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/AnsiColor+Plugin and then enable it per-job. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Hervé, > > would it be possible to enhance

Re: any ideas why 'Scanning for projects' is very slow ?

Try: mvn --no-snapshot-updates Try: https://github.com/takari/maven-profiler On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven > under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Resources Plugin version 3.0.0

Passive checking on a variety of projects, didn't raise any flags here. RHEL 7, Java 8, Maven 3.3.9 +1 non-binding On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le vendredi 6 mai 2016 01:46:26 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : >> Hi, >>

Re: Fully qualified dependency names in war

https://github.com/jieryn/libname-conflict-war I am trying to recreate the issue, that's as far as I've gotten so far. If you run the build and then look in the web module's war, you'll see lots of artifactName+version conflicts, including local to the reactor as well as a 3rd party library

Re: Fully qualified dependency names in war

And I just tested it, it works nicely. @{groupId}@-@{artifactId}@-@{version}@@{dashClassifier}@.@{extension}@ Thanks! :-) On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:29 AM, jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, you rock. Thanks, Karl! I thought I had reviewed the plugin > thoroughly enough, b

Re: Fully qualified dependency names in war

Wow, you rock. Thanks, Karl! I thought I had reviewed the plugin thoroughly enough, but obviously not. Thank you! On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/10/16 2:12 PM, jieryn wrote: >> >> Where should I look for

Fully qualified dependency names in war

Where should I look for providing an option to have the fully qualified GAV name specified in built WAR files? Sometimes this happens automatically when two short jar names would be added to WEB-INF/lib, the second one will be added with the fully specified GAV. I'd actually like to make this an

[GitHub] maven-scm pull request: [FIX] allow jgit provider to work with bui...

GitHub user jieryn opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/48 [FIX] allow jgit provider to work with buildnumber-m-p:create which r… …equires the getInfoCommand to be supported You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 1.5, take 2

+1 non-binding, works for a few of my projects that I tested, I can not detect any differences from basic visual inspection On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2016-02-24 um 02:47 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> nice work >> I have one

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.5

-1, non-binding, mvn-3.3.9, openjdk 1.8.0_71 ... works with 3.4, fails with 3.5 src/site/site.xml snippet mvn-3.3.9 log: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.5:run (default-cli) on project parent: Unable to set up webapp:

Re: [jira] [Closed] (MWAR-350) Add Skip Parameter to Skip the process

UAT module which is war for easy overlay of the main WAR module but without double-pushing your (fat) war into the upstream repository? On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > I really wonder why it is useful to add a skip-parameter to the packaging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

+1 non-binding, tested with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9 on a smallish project that was previously using shade 2.4.1. Thanks. On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > `+1 > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < >

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.9

mvn-339 seems to be working for me for most cases except the codehaus license maven plugin. In fact, all the mvn33x line seems to have this issue. mvn325 is most recent version which works for me for this plugin. non binding: +0 [INFO] --- license-maven-plugin:1.8:update-file-header

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.9

, jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > mvn-339 seems to be working for me for most cases except the codehaus > license maven plugin. In fact, all the mvn33x line seems to have this > issue. mvn325 is most recent version which works for me for this > plugin. > > non binding: +0 >

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.9

t;> >> Also checked with Java 1.7, Java 1.8 no problems... >> >> Hm...Can you post how you have called Maven? >> >> Which os you are running on? >> >> Is the project somewhere available ? Or better add the information to >> the issue you have opened

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Tested with a few projects, I see no issues with this release. Thank you, +1 non-binding. On Oct 29, 2015 17:15, "Tamás Cservenák" wrote: > +1 beer > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 21:29 Andreas Gudian > wrote: > > > It's a smooth ride. Here's my +1 ...

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 2.8.1

+1 (non-binding) Apache Maven 3.3.6 (72e1aad6861c2052a65753553d92ecc2a6849ce5; 2015-07-30T22:29:49-04:00) Java version: 1.8.0_51, vendor: Oracle Corporation Tested: cim distribution-management index issue-tracking license mailing-list modules

Re: Writing poms from mojos

tidy-maven-plugin rewrites POMs. http://www.mojohaus.org/tidy-maven-plugin/ On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote: > There are ~3000 plugins in Maven Central ( > http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|p%3A%22maven-plugin%22). My eyes > glazed over after

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.5

+1 non binding, works for me and a ton of projects internally; no funky parent resolution going on here though On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote: -1 FWIW There is a regression with parent pom version range support (see MNG-2199 [1]) when locating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Fluido Skin Version 1.4

Works for me on a couple of simple site projects. +1 non-binding On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, We solved 9 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926version=12331574 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.3 Release

Works for me in several projects. Just basic build and test, multi-threaded. +1 non-binding On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Great, thanks for testing. jvz On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote: On 23 Apr 2015, at 0:22, Jason

Re: Building SCM 1.9.5-SNAPSHOT

Please dockerize all maven developer environments. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: Another different version, another different set of issues to solve. [INFO] --- apache-rat-plugin:0.11:check (rat-check) @ maven-scm --- [INFO] 57 implicit excludes

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.1 Release

Works for a variety of our internal projects, cut a release, ran a site build. Nothing fancy. +1 non-binding On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: I hope to haves testing done tomorrow On 13 March 2015 at 20:21, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io

Re: Why is distributionManagement inside the pom?

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=1.1-mycompany-01 mvn clean javadoc:jar source:jar deploy -DaltDeploymentUrl=my-Id::default::my-url mvn versions:revert Ok so it's a long command line, but really not that

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18

Works on several of my projects, forked (-T) and not forked; junit, arquillian, tomee. +1 non-binding On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We solved 31 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=20175

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Agree! I thought I saw Jason doing these, but recently it seems anyone can say it is a Maven Developer Hangout. I am confused about this most recent update. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: Question about these hangouts... are they about anything

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.4

-1 ... non-binding; site:run fails with: https://gist.github.com/jieryn/a8dc02b2e6a43d89cd1c On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Hi, We solved 13 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146styleName=Htmlversion=19228

Model Version 5.0.0 - nested properties

It would be convenient to have nested property support for advanced inheritance configuration. An example might be best: project properties foo barbaz/bar /foo /properties /project Where ${project.foo.bar} interpolates as baz. I find that I often want to group configuration

MPIR-293

Can someone please just make the very tiny (+3 characters) fix for MPIR-293? http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-293 It's been languishing for more than half a year. I applied the patch locally, built it, tested it, it works.

Re: Releasing maven-buildnumber-plugin as-is?

I've been running a local release of this plugin internally for a while now, no problems detected. Than you, Baptiste! On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net wrote: Hi, There seems to be a need for a release for buildnumber with @threadSafe added.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.0

Regression from Apache Maven 3.1.1, seen via: bash$ mvn -e -Dmaven.test.skip=true -DskipTests=true -T 2.0C clean install $@ [ERROR] Error executing Maven. java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: 2.0 at

Re: IT failures

+9000 Please don't change existing ITs. Create new ITs with the new versions. This is relatively easy for you to do, and it means a huge amount for downstream users. Please. Once an IT is created and is passing, LEAVE IT ALONE. If you want to update versions used in an IT, create a new IT.

Re: IT failures

Just create a new IT. I can not stress how EASY this is for the developer, and how much WIN is for the end user. Just create a new IT. You want a new version of xx-m-p? Just create a new IP. SVN COPY is so cheap and easy to type, just do it. What is stopping you??? Seriously. Just create a new IT

Re: IT failures

This is totally different than changing the version of xx-maven-plugin used by the ITs. I appreciate testing with a new version of JUnit, or whatever. That is totally different than changing the version of a maven plugin used by an IT. Don't mess with existing tests. It's always wrong to do it.

Re: IT failures

on this. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 February 2014 14:50, jieryn jie...@gmail.com wrote: Don't mess with existing tests. It's always wrong to do it. You're lazy and stupid if you do it. Can you chill with the attitude. Its not helpful, or appreciated

Re: New logo?

It seems that a Raven would be better. It even rhymes with Maven, in English. They have a lot of significance to many different cultures, with themes ranging from wisdom, to good luck, to even blood thirsty birds of battle preferred by warriors. And given this cultural history, there exists a

Re: [ANN] Maven 3.1.1 Release

Greetings, On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: The Apache Maven Team is pleased to announce the release of 3.1.1 Why isn't it showing up like usual at https://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/ ? This affects Jenkins automatic tool installation.

Re: [ANN] Maven 3.1.1 Release

Greetings, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Sorry, meant to say why not use the standard download mechanism which is mirrored? On Oct 14, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Why use the standard download mechanism which is mirrored?

Re: [ANN] Maven 3.1.1 Release

Greetings, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: It's in the archive at the same location: https://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/maven-3/3.1.1/binaries/ Thanks for that link. I thought Jenkins had been updated for the new layout. As you can see from

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

Greetings, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Does 3.1.0 not display this behaviour? On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:41 PM, jieryn jie...@gmail.com wrote: Archive for required library: '$HOME/.m2/repository/$GROUPID/$ARTIFACTID/$VERSION/$FINALNAME.jar' in project

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

Greetings, On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: The distributable binaries and sources for testing can be found here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-016/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.1.1/ I can not definitively say that this is because

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

Greetings, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Christian Schulte c...@schulte.it wrote: Why Java 6 ? Seriously. It does not add any value to Maven compared to Java 5. Java 7 is what provides new APIs Maven could benefit from. Why give up on Java 5 in favour of Java 6 ? Politics is a strong and

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

Greetings, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Christian Schulte c...@schulte.it wrote: Why change '-target 1.5' to '-target 1.6' without any requirement to do so ? Either stay with '-target 1.5' or introduce something which requires '-target 1.6' as a justification. Don't get me wrong. I don't

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

Greetings, On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I don't know what you mean by send pull requests to Jenkins, if you're talking about Apache's Jenkins instance or something more general from the Jenkins project There is something called the

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

Greetings, On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: (Aside: not sure that we'll get that much more eyes for 3.1.0-alpha-x... I think the eyes will only hit it when we get to 3.1.0...) It would be nice if someone sent pull requests to Jenkins so

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

Greetings, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12 more hours from now, I'll do it tonight Version numbers are