Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/136
ð
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/69
> If the shaded artifact is built as a submodule with a different artifact
> ID, then the shade plugin can specify its DRP as its main POM. It lets
> other projects depend on t
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/69
I know @jvanzyl claimed he had an alternative solution that allowed the
caching but I have not seen that in over a year.
I am inclined to agree with removing this hack given the side-effects
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/110
s/Not/Bot/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/110
Not trying to hack by the look of it. I'd heard of these
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user stephenc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/144#discussion_r103110391
--- Diff:
maven-surefire-common/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/report/ConsoleOutputFileReporter.java
---
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ public
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/104
> we don't have a CI validation here
Yep waiting to get SCM API 2.0.x back into the uc and then pester infra to
upgrade
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user stephenc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/32
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user stephenc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/60#issuecomment-124128970
After no comments against merging this and with @ifedorenko saying go for
it I decided to merge... if people object they can revert it out. I am not in
love
Github user stephenc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/60#issuecomment-123696060
@ifedorenko I've simplified this per your comments... still feel that
adding the dependency on maven-artifact is not the correct thing... but it is a
semi-reasonable fix
GitHub user stephenc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/60
[MNG-5840] Parent version is a range hack
- I don't like this, but it does let all the integration tests pass:
```
Running org.apache.maven.it.MavenITmng2199ParentVersionRangeTest
11 matches
Mail list logo