Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Hello, Only lurking those days, but chiming in quickly here :-). 2017-09-10 20:54 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:21:11 +0200, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Robert, >>And if we're focusing on the latter, shouldn't the twitter question be Good remark! I am not against such question on Twitter but I would be interested in one more in comparison to Gradle. *What the Maven should improve to make Maven more attractive against Gradle?* Because I don't

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:21:11 +0200, Stephen Connolly wrote: On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana wrote: Hi All, Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8? When I first saw these options I

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Stephen, I was pragmatic and did not want to push users to use Maven only because JDK 7 is weak. First the interest should go from inside, this means API and then users. I agree with Michael whether we should better focus on Maven 4 and POM structure. For instance today everybody could notice

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Am 2017-09-10 um 19:07 schrieb Stephen Connolly: Hervé and I discussed on irc earlier today. My suggestion - I was going to write up tomorrow - is that we drop 7 for 3.6.x We should focus 3.6.x on making the codebase Java 8 (lambdas, replace FileStream with the non-file handle leak

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

On Sun 10 Sep 2017 at 19:04, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi All, > > Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8? > > When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the > User and Jenkins from Java 8. > And second question was

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Hi All, Are we facing new API regarding networking and security useful in Java 8? When I first saw these options I asked myself what benefit would have the User and Jenkins from Java 8. And second question was whether we would be so flexible to rewrite the code and use Lambda fully anywhere in

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

Hervé and I discussed on irc earlier today. My suggestion - I was going to write up tomorrow - is that we drop 7 for 3.6.x We should focus 3.6.x on making the codebase Java 8 (lambdas, replace FileStream with the non-file handle leak version, adopt Path, etc) with a view to encourage

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

But on twitter thus probably far from being a good representation of our users ... Le dim. 10 sept. 2017 à 18:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : > On Sep 10, 2017 10:33, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > > So what would be the conclusion? > > 35% want to keep

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

On Sep 10, 2017 10:33, "Robert Scholte" wrote: So what would be the conclusion? 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period? IMHO that's a lot but less than the 65% who do not, an overwhelming majority. Gary Robert On Sun, 10 Sep 2017

Re: [RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

So what would be the conclusion? 35% want to keep Java7 as JRE for Maven for a shorter or longer period? IMHO that's a lot Robert On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:55:20 +0200, Stephen Connolly wrote: So poll results: 493 votes cast 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven

[RESULT] Re: Please retweet and vote

So poll results: 493 votes cast 25% want Java 7,8&9 for Maven 3.6.x 65% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x 10% want Java 8&9 for Maven 3.6.x and 6 months of backporting to 3.5.x On Sat 9 Sep 2017 at 11:50, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >