Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Hi Benjamin,
72 hours passed, we are so excited to have the final decision ? Would
it be today ?
Thanks ;)
Tony.
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
aware of any
+1
Used to build Sonar, no problem.
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Emmanuel Venisse,
Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Vincent Siveton, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane
Nicoll, Hervé Boutemy, Arnaud Héritier, Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg,
Brett Porter, Lukas Theussl, Carlos
w00t - congrats to all developers and testers alike.
Time to go add an enforcer rule to all of $works projects for a 3.0 minimum
:)
--
Pull me down under...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
I will promote the artifacts to the central
+1
Kristian
ma., 04.10.2010 kl. 14.16 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1 looks fine for me though
(tried with OpenWebBeans and in company projects)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 10/5/10, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
From: Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
+1
Works like a champ, draws less than an amp
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
Woohoo!
Thanks,
~t~
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues
Hi
+1 (non-binding)
works for me.
Regards
Mark Donszelmann
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
+1 (non-binding)
everything by the book!
On 10/4/10 5:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing
line of this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1
-Lukas
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1 Bring on the 3.0!
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
+1
+1 tested in some projects and works fine
Are we doing a PR with the press team?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
+1 Bring on the 3.0!
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Sanchez car...@apache.org wrote:
+1 tested in some projects and works fine
Are we doing a PR with the press team?
I pinged Sally earlier this month and will follow up.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
+1 Bring on
+1
Niall
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1
Le 5 octobre 2010 00:44, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com a écrit :
Tested on various projects.
+1
Arnaud
On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and
It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an
internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component
maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's
dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and m3. I
haven't had time to fully debug the
2010/10/5 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com
It generally works for my builds apart from the behaviour of an
internal Maven plugin. This plugin uses the shared component
maven-runtime to determine the dependency order of the project's
dependencies, which is subtly different between m2.2.1 and
+1 works for me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net wrote:
+1.
It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having
problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside
surefire between m2.2.1 and m3.
As Olivier said, it's true it's bad to rely on
Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s
Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any
major regression so let's try
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 5 October 2010 14:31, Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net wrote:
+1.
It'd confirm what I checked yesterday (see my other mail). I was having
problem with XML parser due to a different classpath ordering inside
surefire between m2.2.1 and m3.
On 5 October 2010 15:54, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
a DAG which is toposorted is naturally unordered for elements at the same
level in a graph. The set is deterministic, the order of that set is not.
Relying on any ordering for something that is naturally unordered is not
Branching the m3 vote thread:
On 5 October 2010 16:22, Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough before. It's not the ordering
of elements at the same level that's a problem, it's that the element
order is wrong. I was also meaning deterministic with
+1 from me
I've tried it on my private projects and the projects at my day job and
all seems well.
On 2010-10-04 14:16, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
On 5 October 2010 18:35, Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com wrote:
I've taken a quick look at ProjectSorter in the debugger and it looks
like it's skipping vertexes where versions don't match. For example,
if A depends on B:1.0 but B is resolved to 1.1 (via resolution or
management) then
On 5 October 2010 21:50, Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com wrote:
I've raised MNG-4854 [1] to demonstrate the problem.
Benjamin, I understand your comment on the issue. The situation I
have is with maven-runtime where all dependencies have already been
mediated, so project:1.0 is in fact using
Mark Hobson wrote:
Is there a way that we could support both behaviours?
To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one
purpose, that is to figure out the build order of projects within a
reactor. Unless I misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case
and merely
On 5 October 2010 22:43, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
To me the situation looks like this: The ProjectSorter serves one purpose,
that is to figure out the build order of projects within a reactor. Unless I
misunderstand, you seem to have a different use case and merely use
+1
There are a couple of issues (MNG-1911, MNG-4850, and various output
improvements), but not worth holding this up any longer. It's well overdue.
- Brett
On 04/10/2010, at 11:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
+1 (non-binding)
Works fine for our projects.
Great job guys.
Le Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:16:07 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
aware of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing
On 4 October 2010 13:16, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.eduwrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=13142
There are still
+1
Let it be free!
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1
Ran against all my projects successfully
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since
+1,
works fine for me
Nicolas
2010/10/4 Greg Akins angryg...@gmail.com
+1
Ran against all my projects successfully
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of
any
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lun 4 octobre 2010, 14h 16min 07s
Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any
major regression so let's try and cross
+1
Stephen
On 4 October 2010 15:06, Emmanuel Venisse emmanuel.veni...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of
any major
+1
On 10/4/10 8:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
yeah +1
Vincent
2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1 go go maven gadgets!
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:57, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
yeah +1
Vincent
2010/10/4 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
+1
Dan
On Monday 04 October 2010 8:16:07 am Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1 (non-binding)
/Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
Stéphane
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since
+1
After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built
them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate
where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding
issue once analyzed.
Baptiste
2010/10/4 Stephane Nicoll
(non-binding.Sorry)
2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net
+1
After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven 3.0 built
them fine, so it's not blocking at all. I'll have to internally investigate
where the difference comes from, if possible I might file the corresponding
+1 (non-binding)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:33:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0
From: m...@batmat.net
To: dev@maven.apache.org
(non-binding.Sorry)
2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net
+1
After fixing our conf (many xml parsers in the classpath), maven
+1. maven 3.0 looks good on tycho.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
Nonbinding +1; seems to be working well embedded in NetBeans IDE development
builds. Nice job.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware
of any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of
this marathon.
We solved 31 issues since 3.0-beta-3:
+1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release!
Toni
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote:
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 04 octobre 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not
+1 (non binding)
Tested on all Sonar projects including parallel builds and Tycho-based.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:57, Toni Menzel t...@okidokiteam.com wrote:
+1 (non binding) OPS4J stuff builds on and works with this cool release!
Toni
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
On 4 October 2010 05:16, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
I seem to have a problem with a combination of Maven 2 and 3:
-0. I have the same objection to Aether that I noted when it was introduced.
It is now much more difficult for me to enhance dependency resolution in Maven
to include metadata beyond what the Aether api supports since Aether is not
part of Maven.
Ralph
On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Benjamin
Tested on various projects.
+1
Arnaud
On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
feedback on the RCs seems to be decreasing and I am currently not aware of
any major regression so let's try and cross the finishing line of this
marathon.
We solved 31 issues since
+1
Vincent
2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on
+1 (non binding)
works fine with gwt-maven plugin
2010/9/2 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes,
Hi,
Despite a few known bugs in the code, I consider the vote has passed
with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Brian Fox, Emmanuel
Venisse, Arnaud Héritier, Oliver Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (non-binding): Paul Merlin, Stephen Connolly, Tony Chemit,
Sorry, for the late response. I'm running into a few issues building
the JBoss App server with beta-3. I'm currently trying to narrow down
the issues enough to create small test projects/test cases.
The issues seem to be related to very specific edge cases, so I don't
think they are things to
+1
Kristian
Den 30.08.2010 15:09, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So
here we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice
and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on
these
Comparing the results between beta-2 and beta-3 I see a difference in my
builds for the Appassembler Maven Plugin (@mojo.codehaus.org). In beta-2
the plugin (correctly) assembles the dependencies in a flat structure in
my configured lib directory. Whereas beta-3 puts the dependencies in
my
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Given that this is just one plugin, I give this candidate my +1. We
should note this as a known issue in the release notes though.
Please go ahead and fill an issue in MNG.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 30 août 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
+1 (non-binding)
better, stronger, faster :-)
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:09 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)
Hi,
what's a better start for a week
] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components.
Overall, we
Vincent Latombe wrote:
I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that uses ant scripts
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.maven.script.ant.AntMojoWrapper.execute(AntMojoWrapper.java:126)
at
I opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4786 . The test case comes
directly from the Maven book (see
http://www.sonatype.com/books/mhandbook/reference/ch04s04.html)
2010/8/31 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
Vincent Latombe wrote:
I'm getting an NPE, calling a plugin that
+1
Arnaud Héritier
aherit...@apache.org
On Aug 30, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get
+1
2010/8/30 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components.
Overall, we solved 19 issues:
+1
On Aug 30, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
+1 (non-binding)
Tested with my oss and work projects.
Tested a release process using git.
/Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Plus 1. (just discovered the plus key on my board is broken)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release
I'm seeing a regression on 3.0-beta-2 with respect to time for my work's
build most everything aggregator pom build (mvn clean install -DskipTest)
Memory seems improved:
3.0-beta-3: Final Memory: 324M/760M Total time: 14:02.778s
3.0-beta-2: Final Memory: 524M/800M Total time: 8:58.144s
Nothing
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get
+1
Le Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:09:28 +0200,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get
+1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here
we go!
Apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more
+1 (non binding).
Tested on a 30+ multimodule build without problem.
2010/8/30 Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com
+1. Both tycho and m2eclipse builds are happy.
--
Regards,
Igor
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ? So here we
+1
20-some modules with AspectJ, built, deploy.
Terracotta plugin 1.4.0 failed to execute tests with NPE in aether code
[MNG-4785], worked fine in beta-2. But imho - one plugin is not a reason
to stop this version, could be fixed in beta-4
On 8/30/10 6:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
+1 The artifacts I was getting the NPEs on during release no longer NPE with
current SNAPSHOTs and this build.
--
Pull me down under...
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
what's a better start for a week than a new fresh release :-) ?
With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new
build available?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Not yet
Arnaud
On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
With the vote canceled, I may have missed the respin. Is there a new
build available?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For
+1
/Paul
Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
+1 (non-binding)
2010/8/26 Paul Merlin eska...@n0pe.org
+1
/Paul
Quoting Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components.
Mark Derricutt wrote:
-1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current
nightly build when doing releases.
https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549
Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779
Thanks, I hereby cancel the vote to fix this first.
Benjamin
If there's any further information I can give let me know.
I suspect there's something to do with the dependencies in the project, as
some of our artifacts released fine, but 3-4 had this NPE.
1) We use version ranges for our internal dependecies, such as [2.0.0,3.0.0)
2) We're using nexus 1.5.x
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these
new components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16681
There are still a
+1
On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice and
Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on these new
components. Overall, we solved 16 issues:
+1
20-some module project with AspectJ Terracotta - no issues.
On 8/25/10 4:36 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
apart from another few regression fixes, this release includes Guice
and Aether [0] and shall help to get some more community testing on
these new components. Overall, we solved
-1 - I'm getting NullPointerExceptions with the aether in todays current
nightly build when doing releases.
https://gist.github.com/8ac6e71ad49cf8928549
Raised as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4779
--
Pull me down under...
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Oleg Gusakov
+1 Works well on our complex projects too.
-Ben
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 28 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16090
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1 from me, works on our tricky builds
-Stephen
On 7 August 2010 12:16, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
We solved 28 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16090
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
noticed different behavior when running =beta-1 and this, I'm guessing it's
related to: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4615 ([regression] @required
plugin parameters are not validated)
the new behavior might actually be the desired behavior, not sure
from the plugin's plugin.xml:
mojo
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier
Lamy, Daniel Kulp, Stéphane Nicoll, Arnaud Héritier, Lukas Theussl,
Emmanuel Venisse, Vincent Siveton, Brian Fox, Ralph Goers
+1 (non-binding): Christian Edward Gruber,
lukewpatterson wrote:
my project never explicitly defines the project.url element in the pom [...]
The parameters 'docURL' for goal ...:generate-osgi-manifest are missing or
invalid...
like I said, this could very well be the desired behavior, not sure what
missing pom elements default to
A
+100 - works on one of my OSGi artifacts where beta-1 ( and last SNAPSHOTs
from a week or so ago ) failed.
My only issue left is the lack of -SNAPSHOTs in version ranges ( an ongoing
M3 gripe that hopefully some mid-way resolution can be discovered ).
--
Pull me down under...
On Wed, Aug 11,
+1
Under Issues to be reviewed for 3.x [1] there are a couple of issues
that are closed as fixed without a 'fix for' version. can this be
cleaned up?
I also keep bumping into MNG-1378 [2]. It would be nice if this could be
addressed during the betas still (I also just noticed that it
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
