Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-26 Thread Raphael Ackermann
le : Ven 23 avril 2010, 11 h 53 min 32 s Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1 I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my settings.xml but get following warnings on maven3 and error with maven2: maven 3 mvn install -DskipTests=true [WARNING] [WARNING] Some

Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-26 Thread Julien HENRY
min 49 s Objet : Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1 Added it to my corporate super pom. No complaints there. But if I try to run mvn install (mvn2) with the added profile I get an enforcer error saying that the maven-site-plugin has no version specified. If I remove the 3.0

Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
d'origine De : Raphael Ackermann raphael.ackerm...@gmail.com À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Lun 26 avril 2010, 13 h 05 min 49 s Objet : Re: Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1 Added it to my corporate super pom. No complaints there. But if I try

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Jason van Zyl, Arnaud Héritier, Brian Fox, Emmanuel Venisse, Olivier Lamy, John Casey, Lukas Theussl, Hervé Boutemy, Brett Porter +1 (non-binding): Stephen Connolly, Tamás Cservenák, Shane Isbell, Kristian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-23 Thread Raphael Ackermann
I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my settings.xml but get following warnings on maven3 and error with maven2: maven 3 mvn install -DskipTests=true [WARNING] [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective settings [WARNING] Unrecognised tag: 'build'

Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-23 Thread Julien HENRY
@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Ven 23 avril 2010, 11 h 53 min 32 s Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1 I copied the profile from the wiki website and added it to my settings.xml but get following warnings on maven3 and error with maven2: maven 3 mvn install -DskipTests=true

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-22 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 works fine on my test-projects 2010/4/22 Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com +1 Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few our internal projects I work on. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-22 Thread Brett Porter
+1 I downloaded the source tarball, checked the signature, and built from sources. Used that to build a few projects. I still have some niggles (the same as previous alphas), I just need to articulate them into JIRA before it goes final... On 20/04/2010, at 3:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
this can be done simply by adding a profile activated with ${basedir} property: I just added instruction at the end of Wiki page [1] Regards, Hervé [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+and+site+plugin Le jeudi 22 avril 2010, Niall Pemberton a écrit : On Tue, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-21 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-21 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 19 avril 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16 089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: No. It's 3.x prerequisite. It would be good if there was some mechanism so that the site generation could be made to work with either m2 or m3. Perhaps by activating different profiles dependant on the maven version -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-21 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1 Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few our internal projects I work on. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Olivier, is there something critical missing? Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then it seemed quite good to me. Regards, Hervé Le mardi 20 avril 2010, Arnaud Héritier a écrit : Ok thx. I agree that we have a good tests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is there something critical missing? No except some spare time :-) Last time I tested a SNAPSHOT, we fixed some issues then

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I just tried 3 the release build on one of my projects and got the following error message: [ERROR] The project com.tsystems.icto.tom:tom-icto-dependencies:0.2.22-SNAPSHOT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no. so I would think it is an error on your side On 20 April 2010 08:11, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely not a killer, but perhaps something to know: I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: provided does not make sense for a dependency of a plugin. for a dependency of a project, yes, but of a plugin, no.  so I would think it is an error on your side You are right. After changing that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is there something critical missing? No except some spare time :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
No. It's 3.x prerequisite. 2010/4/20 Brett Porter br...@apache.org: On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr: what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1? Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff. Olivier, is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 Working here. It's nice to see maven getting closer to the 3.0\o/ /Paul Le lundi 19 avril 2010 19:50:28, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16 089 There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2010/4/19 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-20 Thread John Casey
+1 works well here. On 4/19/10 1:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 Wee! On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: +1 Wee! On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the beta. What is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? Thanks, Jochen -- Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Shane Isbell
+1 Glad to see a movement to beta Shane

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 ma., 19.04.2010 kl. 19.50 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Thus we start only bug fixes releases ? Guice won't be included in 3.0 ? Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net 2010/4/19 Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net +1 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the beta. What is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? When there's a long enough period where users don't report any serious issues it will be 3.0. No

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
If Stuart finishes the work it will go in. I have 100% confidence in the ITs and that we'll find anything before users do as a result of switching the container. We have had very few problems with flipping Nexus from Plexus to Guice and Stuart was able to fix those very quickly. Stuart is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the beta. What is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final? When there's a long

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the beta. What is the meaning? Are there any plans of a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/04/2010, at 8:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Brian Fox
+1 works ok here. On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: +1 Wee! On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-04-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Ok thx. I agree that we have a good tests coverage to be quiet to switch. Is there something which could be integrated before 3.0 final ? I remember I saw a twit from you several weeks ago about replacing the dl/ul layer to use a non-jetty stuff. Arnaud On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Jason van Zyl