Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-06 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst
+1 already running beta-1 for a while now and everyone is asking me how to get a colored build ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-06 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 S. On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 00:14, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text > > In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-06 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:14:45 +0200, Stephen Connolly wrote: Hi, We solved 86 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-06 Thread Thomas Collignon
+1 ok for me too 2017-04-06 8:13 GMT+02:00 Chas Honton : > +1 > > Java 1.8.0_74 > Mac OS X 10.12.3 > > Multi-module project with 562 goals (50 unique) > > Chas > > > On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-06 Thread Chas Honton
+1 Java 1.8.0_74 Mac OS X 10.12.3 Multi-module project with 562 goals (50 unique) Chas > On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-05 Thread Elliot Metsger
+1 non-binding after testing with a bunch of different projects on MacOS 10.11.6 (15G31) Darwin Elliots-iMac.fios-router.home 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0: Thu Jun 23 18:25:34 PDT 2016; root:xnu-3248.60.10~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Stephen Connolly <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-05 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 after testing with a lot of different projects On Thu 6 Apr 2017 at 00:01, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 4 April 2017 at 08:14, Stephen Connolly >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-05 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > On 4 April 2017 at 08:14, Stephen Connolly com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 86 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 4 April 2017 at 08:14, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12316922=12336084=Text > > In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 5 avril 2017, 05:17:23 CEST Raphael Ackermann a écrit : > +1 (non binding). tested with company build. > love the color support out of the box I like such feedback :) > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:37 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Raphael Ackermann
+1 (non binding). tested with company build. love the color support out of the box On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:37 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Fred Cooke
+1 non binding, built my main app without drama, and the rest of my personal projects are simpler On 5 April 2017 at 09:37, Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Tibor Digana
+1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12316922=12336084=Text > > In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, +1 (binding) Tested on a large OSGi build with 722 modules...without any issue. Tested serveral projects of my own, some Maven extensions etc., Maven itself, some Maven plugins and some codehaus projects etc. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 04/04/17 00:14, Stephen Connolly wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Manfred Moser
+1 Looking forward to using it and spreading it to other users ;-) Manfred Stephen Connolly wrote on 2017-04-03 15:14: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text > > In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Anders Hammar
+1, non-binding Tested on Windows 7 with IBM JDK 7.1. One minor regression found [1]. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6205 /Anders On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1 -- Regards, Igor On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Petr Široký wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested on several big projects, with dozens of different plugins. No > issue > found. > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Petr Široký
+1 (non-binding) Tested on several big projects, with dozens of different plugins. No issue found. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
+1 (non-binding) Tested with huge OSGi projects without problems regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-04-04 11:52 GMT+02:00 dejan2609 : > *+1* (non binding). > > Tested Maven 3.5.0 on a large project with a bunch of plugins: all is > green. > > > > -- > View this message in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread dejan2609
*+1* (non binding). Tested Maven 3.5.0 on a large project with a bunch of plugins: all is green. -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-3-5-0-tp5904383p5904485.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
Friendly reminder, all votes welcome. Note: If this is the first time participating in a release vote for the Apache Maven project, there are some legal requirements delegated on the Maven project by the Apache Foundation board. One of those requirements is that at least 3 +1 votes *by members of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-03 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 Non Binding. Bring. It. On. On 4 Apr 2017, at 10:14, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
Analyzer... stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1326 groupId: org.apache.maven artifactId: apache-maven version: 3.5.0 Source ZIP url exists.

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

2017-04-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hi, We solved 86 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 03/24/17 um 16:54 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: > Hi, > > On 24/03/17 02:17, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> we have absolutely no OSX user building Maven core ITs on his personal >> computer? >> seriously? >> Or is there no core IT that shows the issue? then it has to be discovered by >> hand? > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-24 Thread Chas Honton
Not testing maven core ITs. Using multi-module project with 562 goal invocations (50 unique goals) including three integration test suites run with invoker plugin. +1 tested on OS X 10.12.3, Java 1.8.0_074 ++1: 3.5.0 warned about a dependent Pom problem which was not found with 3.3.9 Chas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-24 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 24/03/17 02:17, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: we have absolutely no OSX user building Maven core ITs on his personal computer? seriously? Or is there no core IT that shows the issue? then it has to be discovered by hand? I can test today evening or tomorrow...on my Mac.. If this helps? Kind

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 20 March 2017 at 18:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12316922=12339665=Text > > There are still 10 issues left in JIRA for 3.5.0, but I do not think any > of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-24 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 19:18:06 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote: Hi, We solved 15 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12339665=Text There are still 10 issues left in JIRA for 3.5.0, but I do not think any of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
we have absolutely no OSX user building Maven core ITs on his personal computer? seriously? Or is there no core IT that shows the issue? then it has to be discovered by hand? Notice: to me, this does not mean we need a beta-2: 3.5.0 will have bugs, like any past or future release Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 no issues found when building a lot of projects for myself Regards, Hervé Le lundi 20 mars 2017, 18:18:06 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922 > rsion=12339665=Text > > There are still 10

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
no, nothing so serious that we need a beta-2 we had no luck to hit 2 different bugs with 2 different versions of maven- assembly-plugin, but each time, impact was limited (not ideal, but can live with it). I double checked, and don't hesitate everybody to do also, the current version doees not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
Anyone else have anything to report? I think we have met the requirements to release (I'll check tomorrow) But more feedback is always better On Thu 23 Mar 2017 at 22:46, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > On 21 March 2017 at 05:18, Stephen Connolly < >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 21 March 2017 at 05:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12316922=12339665=Text > > There are still 10 issues left in JIRA for 3.5.0, but I do not think any > of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 03/23/17 um 19:20 schrieb Christian Schulte: > Am 03/23/17 um 10:08 schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> Hervé do you think this ordering issue is serious enough to drop and run a >> beta-2? >> >> IMHO no as it is just a beta and we can add it as a known issue in the >> release notes. > > Unrelated to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 03/23/17 um 10:08 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > Hervé do you think this ordering issue is serious enough to drop and run a > beta-2? > > IMHO no as it is just a beta and we can add it as a known issue in the > release notes. Unrelated to this issue there has been another report regarding the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hervé do you think this ordering issue is serious enough to drop and run a beta-2? IMHO no as it is just a beta and we can add it as a known issue in the release notes. On Thu 23 Mar 2017 at 04:15, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > in short: issue MNG-6192 [1] created and fixed > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-23 Thread Thomas Collignon
Hello +1 2017-03-23 5:14 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY : > in short: issue MNG-6192 [1] created and fixed > > Thanks for the report, both on what works and what does not work so well :) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6192 > > Le

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
in short: issue MNG-6192 [1] created and fixed Thanks for the report, both on what works and what does not work so well :) Regards, Hervé [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6192 Le mercredi 22 mars 2017, 05:55:36 CET dejan2609 a écrit : > +1, it works on dozen of projects. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-22 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 21 Mar 2017, at 7:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > +1 non binding for me on my OSGi / tiles related builds. > > > -- > Mark Derricutt > http://www.theoryinpractice.net >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-22 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 21 Mar 2017, at 7:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Vote open for 72 hours. +1 non binding for me on my OSGi / tiles related builds. -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-22 Thread dejan2609
+1, it works on dozen of projects. Minor issue is related to maven wrapper: $ ./mvnw clean install Downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1325/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.5.0-beta- 1/apache-maven-3.5.0-beta-1-bin.zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-21 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, tested with several project also a large OSGi build ...without any issue.. +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 20/03/17 19:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: Hi, We solved 15 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12339665=Text There are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 20 March 2017 at 18:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Analyzer... > > stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1325 > groupId: org.apache.maven > artifactId: apache-maven > version: 3.5.0-beta-1 > > Source ZIP url exists. >

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hi, We solved 15 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12339665=Text There are still 10 issues left in JIRA for 3.5.0, but I do not think any of those are blocking an beta release and perhaps could be descoped for 3.5.0:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-beta-1

2017-03-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
Analyzer... stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1325 groupId: org.apache.maven artifactId: apache-maven version: 3.5.0-beta-1 Source ZIP url exists.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-03-02 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hi guys, I've been reminded of another issue that was supposed to go into 3.4.0 at the time but seem to have forgotten about it when the 3.4-3.5 scrubbing thing happened. It's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6025 Really minor thing that doesn't affect maven itself, but could help a lot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-03-01 Thread Thomas Collignon
Yes +1 to improve withMaven with color support 2017-03-01 9:23 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Héritier : > I'll do some tests later but yes the advice is often to not use the Maven > Project type in Jenkins. > Using the ansi color plugin allows to display colors. I'll probably use > that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-03-01 Thread Arnaud Héritier
I'll do some tests later but yes the advice is often to not use the Maven Project type in Jenkins. Using the ansi color plugin allows to display colors. I'll probably use that path and configure it by default for maven jobs and/or I'll set -B if it's not already done ... For freestyle jobs I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-28 Thread Thomas Collignon
Yes Robert you have Right, Jenkins use -B by default In this case I have : - Maven Job - Jenkins 2.19.4 Output command is : <===[JENKINS REMOTING CAPACITY]===>channel started Executing Maven: -B -f /data/blabla/pom.xml -s /opt/apache-maven-3.5.0-alpha-1/conf/settings.xml -gs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-28 Thread Robert Scholte
bq. NOTE: in Jenkins by default the console output is ugly with maven 3.5.0-alpha-1 (see next). To fix this the Ansi Color Plugin is necessary ! this is weird. I would expect Jenksins to always run in batch-mode (-B), which should disable Ansi. Robert On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:40:51 +0100,

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-28 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 23 February 2017 at 16:10, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 65 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12316922=12339664=Text > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA for 3.5.0, but I do not > think

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Ralph Goers
hen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>> > Date: Mon 27 Feb 2017 at 14:42 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1 > To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org <mailto:dev@maven.apache.org>> > > > Hervé, Robert you have commented but I do not see a vot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread thomas COLLIGNON
Hello, +1 for me too Tested on different projects with different kind of plugins, on MacOsX and Linux, IDE, CLI and IT If you want to see the details, I wrote a little post : https://tcollignon.github.io/2017/02/27/Test-Maven-350-alpha-1.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 28 Feb 2017, at 7:11, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I already voted, but I'll redo: > > +1 +200 from me :) -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Arnaud Héritier
tested on several projects +1 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Guillaume Boué wrote: > +1 from me too > > Tested with some Tycho builds of Spring and it worked fine. Also tested on > FreeBSD / Ubuntu / Windows without issues. > > > Le 27/02/2017 à 19:11, Hervé BOUTEMY a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Guillaume Boué
+1 from me too Tested with some Tycho builds of Spring and it worked fine. Also tested on FreeBSD / Ubuntu / Windows without issues. Le 27/02/2017 à 19:11, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : I already voted, but I'll redo: +1 tested with many builds: it works as well as I expected (near a RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Andreas Gudian
+1 Really awesome stuff, everyone! (I tested with a good range of projects, some of them having different versions of some karaf-maven-plugins that tend to break with Maven updates -- everything was smooth, though.) 2017-02-23 17:10 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Did some very basic tests running CXF builds and it all seems to work OK. Not very elaborate set of tests though. Dan > On Feb 27, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > Hervé, Robert you have commented but I do not see a vote cast. I believe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I already voted, but I'll redo: +1 tested with many builds: it works as well as I expected (near a RC confidence) Let's fix the identified little glitches, and we'll have our 3.5.0 final :) Regards, Hervé Le lundi 27 février 2017, 14:42:12 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit : > Hervé, Robert you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Robert Scholte
alpha-quality, right? ;) I haven't witnessed any regression, so +1 Robert On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:42:12 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote: Hervé, Robert you have commented but I do not see a vote cast. I believe I have 3 binding votes, but as one of those is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-27 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hervé, Robert you have commented but I do not see a vote cast. I believe I have 3 binding votes, but as one of those is mine I would be more comfortable with some more On 23 February 2017 at 16:10, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 65 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Tibor Digana
@Stephen The problem is no problem. Sorry my bad during private method refactoring in an IT. No issue. On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:03 PM, stephenconnolly [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5900267...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > We can investigate... > > Could also be an invoker issue as we are just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
We can investigate... Could also be an invoker issue as we are just effectively passing through the parsed options On Sun 26 Feb 2017 at 12:59, Tibor Digana wrote: > @Stephen > I have an issue with system properties. Could it be caused by the Builder? > There is no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Tibor Digana
@Stephen I have an issue with system properties. Could it be caused by the Builder? There is no space between *-Dtest=* and profile *-P* clean -Dsurefire.version=2.19.2-SNAPSHOT *-Dtest=-P* surefire-junit47 test Since this is JUnit 4.8 test only, this happened after I removed TestNG useless

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
FYI, I published the reference documentation http://maven.apache.org/ref/3-LATEST/ just did classical "mvn -Preporting site site:stage" followed by "mvn scm- publish:publish-scm" as defined in documentation [1] once the vote is validated, just follow the next steps to publish the versioned

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Tibor Digana
>> CLI would print a WARNING, because it shows some strange situation that people didn't expect Duplicates of sys props should be logged with Warning on console. I totally agree with Herve. Good catch, Herve! On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY [via Maven] <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 tested with many builds: it works as well as I expected (near a RC confidence) Let's fix the identified little glitches, and we'll have our 3.5.0 final :) Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 23 février 2017, 16:10:18 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 65 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-26 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
on this, I don't have exactly same opinion: yes, Maven 3.5.0 should behave like Maven 3.3.9, then we should fix Maven as much as possible and not force Surefire ITs to be changed but if Surefire ITs define multiple times the same property on CLI, then use a edge case, removing the demendency on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/25/17 um 17:25 schrieb Tibor Digana: >>> There are two commits for MNG-6078 part of -alpha-1. > > This was caused by system property duplicates in surefire ITs. > It is already fixed in a branch SUREFIRE_SYSPROP_DUPLICATES. If something works with 3.3.9 but not 3.5.0, we need to fix it in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think it might be better if we could release them into a different repo so that the artifacts are available - just not synced to central. Either that or we say screw it sync to central... al least if we make them available via dist. If we don't make available via dist, then yes we should just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Robert Scholte
I would say: all pre-final should be dropped, i.e. should not up in Central. However, we could make the distributions available for download. If this is done via the staged repository or via our dist folder[1], I don't mind; whatever fits best. Robert [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, the last two days I'm running the 3.5.0-alpha-1 here on my mac with system installation and doing my work under usual user...not any problem so far... I have taken a look into the lib/ext folder where I can't find a file similar to that which could only be there if the process has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
We need to start thinking whether any of the issues so far are enough to drop alpha-1 and run with alpha-2 IMHO we would gain more information from users if we release alpha-1 with and ACK for the known issues and say that alpha-2 is 1-2 weeks away rather than drop alpha-1 and wait that time for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Benson Margulies
Is it still non-critical if the user lacks write access to that directory? On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > found a non-critical issue. It seems like with every Maven build, a new > lib/ext/jansi-64-1-xxx.13 is generated. > If

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2017-02-25 um 17:07 schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi, found a non-critical issue. It seems like with every Maven build, a new lib/ext/jansi-64-1-xxx.13 is generated. If this is a temp-file, I'd rather write it to the OS temp folder instead of the Maven distribution. This is horribly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Tibor Digana
The SNAPSHOT is therefore getting quite big 70 MB. On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > found a non-critical issue. It seems like with every Maven build, a new > lib/ext/jansi-64-1-xxx.13 is generated. > If this is a temp-file, I'd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Tibor Digana
>>There are two commits for MNG-6078 part of -alpha-1. This was caused by system property duplicates in surefire ITs. It is already fixed in a branch SUREFIRE_SYSPROP_DUPLICATES. System props duplicates: -DreuseForks=false -DreuseForks=true I am sure the ITs now pass because of Stepen's commit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, found a non-critical issue. It seems like with every Maven build, a new lib/ext/jansi-64-1-xxx.13 is generated. If this is a temp-file, I'd rather write it to the OS temp folder instead of the Maven distribution. Robert On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:10:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/25/17 um 14:40 schrieb Tibor Digana: > @Stephen > @Michael-O > What changed in Maven after Michael used his snapshot version of > Maven-3.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > Michael said that surefire failed with ForkModeIT and he tested Surefire's > commits from HEAD to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Tibor Digana
@Stephen @Michael-O What changed in Maven after Michael used his snapshot version of Maven-3.5.0-SNAPSHOT? Michael said that surefire failed with ForkModeIT and he tested Surefire's commits from HEAD to 502d18442113b4c6c72630dca5842e1eb287b8b0. I followed more deeply in the commits of Surefire

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
We should also tip our hat to what happened to 3.4.x On Sat 25 Feb 2017 at 11:41, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we can do alpha release notes. It maybe on a sub page > > Thanks for picking this up (I was going to start it later today subject to > family

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think we can do alpha release notes. It maybe on a sub page Thanks for picking this up (I was going to start it later today subject to family approval ;-) ) On Sat 25 Feb 2017 at 11:34, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > I have started to summarize the changes we had in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I have started to summarize the changes we had in 3.5.0-alpha-1.. https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-release-notes/blob/master/content/markdown/docs/3.5.0/release-notes.md If there are any supplementals/changes/fixes etc. Please make an issue or a pull request to it...or write here...

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/24/17 um 21:03 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > To reflect the practice we should use for these going forward +1 I should have included -alpha-0 in those ranges right from the start. Regards, -- Christian - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
To reflect the practice we should use for these going forward On Fri 24 Feb 2017 at 19:54, Robert Scholte wrote: > ... ,3.5.0-alpha-0) > > sure, effect is the same, but why not ",3.5.0-alpha-1)" to reflect an > existing version > > Robert > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:51:18

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Scholte
... ,3.5.0-alpha-0) sure, effect is the same, but why not ",3.5.0-alpha-1)" to reflect an existing version Robert On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:51:18 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote: c4cd8cf3b5e4c6d0a7f52a3d282229bda29b5f58 in maven-integration-testing should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
c4cd8cf3b5e4c6d0a7f52a3d282229bda29b5f58 in maven-integration-testing should fix this issue On 24 February 2017 at 19:39, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3.5.0 > 3.5.0-alpha-1 > > On 24 February 2017 at 19:38, Guillaume Boué wrote: > >> I also ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
3.5.0 > 3.5.0-alpha-1 On 24 February 2017 at 19:38, Guillaume Boué wrote: > I also ran the ITs on a Windows machine, hitting the same error in the > tests as mentioned by Robert. Additionally, I had the following errors: > > Failed tests: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
The version range may not work for 3.5.0-alpha-1 is all On 24 February 2017 at 19:33, Christian Schulte wrote: > Am 02/24/17 um 18:34 schrieb Robert Scholte: > > When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is > > an invalid version range, right? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Guillaume Boué
I also ran the ITs on a Windows machine, hitting the same error in the tests as mentioned by Robert. Additionally, I had the following errors: Failed tests: MavenITmng2199ParentVersionRangeTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:244 Expected failure when with Maven version 3.5.0-alpha-1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 02/24/17 um 18:34 schrieb Robert Scholte: > When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is > an invalid version range, right? Are you really running the IT master branch? There have been no commits to maven master without a successful IT run before. I wonder how

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Scholte
When running the maven-its, I get this failing test. I think the cause is an invalid version range, right? Robert Tests in error: MavenITmng5805PkgTypeMojoConfiguration>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testPkgTypeMojoConfiguration:27 ╗ Verification On Thu, 23 Feb 2017

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 24/02/17 15:59, Petr Široký wrote: Hello, I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds of modules in total) and everything looks good. +1 non-binding (hopefully I understood correctly I can do that) Petr Thanks...appreciate your feedback... And of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, highly appreciated to have some feedback from the community... Thanks for that. Karl Heinz Marbaise On 24/02/17 08:58, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I'm not sure if I can give any vote (even non-binding +1), but I tested several large OSGi projects using 3.5.0-alpha-1 without problems.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Petar Tahchiev
+1 I've been testing today with our projects and it all looks good. 2017-02-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Petr Široký : > Hello, > > I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds > of modules in total) and everything looks good. > > +1 non-binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Petr Široký
Hello, I've tested the 3.5.0-alpha-1 with several quite large projects (hundreds of modules in total) and everything looks good. +1 non-binding (hopefully I understood correctly I can do that) Petr On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:13 AM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6178 created On 23 February 2017 at 21:56, Christian Schulte wrote: > Can we have this patch included? I wanted to commit this to master > yesterday when the build job succeeded. This is just pending the Jenkins > update to get the job

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-24 Thread Stephen Connolly
While we have a legal requirement to get at least 3x+1 votes from PMC members (which are know as binding votes), all votes are welcome. The more reports we have from the community, the better! On Fri 24 Feb 2017 at 07:58, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-02-23 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello I'm not sure if I can give any vote (even non-binding +1), but I tested several large OSGi projects using 3.5.0-alpha-1 without problems. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-02-23 23:44 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly : > This is only an alpha, I'm not calling a halt

  1   2   >