+1 too.
Emmanuel
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (reviewed the code changes, checked licenses, generated a multi-module
project and opened then converted it in 7.0.3)
On 08/08/2008, at 3:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
We need one more vote for
We need one more vote for this one...
Any IDEA users out there?
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
that change to solve the testing for IDEA-102, so it's by design.
We
+1 (reviewed the code changes, checked licenses, generated a multi-
module project and opened then converted it in 7.0.3)
On 08/08/2008, at 3:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
We need one more vote for this one...
Any IDEA users out there?
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
Second try, this time with
+1
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
that change to solve the testing for IDEA-102, so it's by design.
We solved 8 issues:
+1
Arnaud
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
that change to solve the testing for
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
that change to solve the testing for IDEA-102, so it's by design.
We solved 8 issues:
Hi Dennis,
Did you redeploy the site? I don't see r682147... Maybe it is the
sync, wait and see.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/8/3 Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
