Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Olivier Lamy, Emmanuel Venisse, Herve
Boutemy, Vincent Siveton
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit, Tamás Cservenák
I will continue the release process.
Thanks!
+1
Vincent
2011/9/26 Paul Gier pg...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:26:06 -0500
Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (non binding)
Works fine for your projects.
Tony.
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
+1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
+1
2011/9/27 Paul Gier pg...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
I noticed some possible problems in the staged site docs. The maven
failsafe plugin no longer generates a site, and the shadefire JUnit 3
provider also doesn't have a site.
Looks like the site configuration was removed from the failsafe plugin
[1], and the parent relationship was changed for
shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely private artifact in
the surefire build, basically a shaded previous version of surefire to
run the tests for surefire itself.
Stephen did the site work and I'm sure he can tell us what's up ;)
Kristian
ti., 27.09.2011 kl. 09.12 -0500, skrev
Hmmm the site was being generated for 2.9...
Paul,
What version of maven did you stage the docs with?
-Stephen
On 27 September 2011 15:24, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely private artifact in
the surefire build,
You should have see something like this when runing mvn site
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Maven Surefire Plugin 2.11-SNAPSHOT
[INFO]
[INFO]
*[INFO] ---
The only problem is that a link for Shadefire still shows up as one of
the modules of surefire. For now, should I just hack the HTML to remove
this link?
http://maven.apache.org/surefire-2.10/
On 09/27/2011 09:24 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely
I ran mvn site:site instead of following the directions like I was
supposed to ;)
The failsafe plugin staging URL now looks good (pending sync).
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.10/
On 09/27/2011 09:36 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
You should have see something like this
+1
Hervé
Le mardi 27 septembre 2011, Paul Gier a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17
431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejq
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Den 27.09.2011 00:26, skrev Paul Gier:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
15 matches
Mail list logo