On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a
chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and new
repos, there's no reason not to use the
As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been proxied, not the entire
contents of p.a.o.
On 2/18/09 10:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
This is probably
...@reply.infinity.nu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml
maven/pom.xml
As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been
Subject: RE: svn commit: r744288 - in /maven/pom/trunk: asf/pom.xml
maven/pom.xml
Seems to be proxying just fine:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/maven/maven-project-bu
ilder/3.0-SNAPSHOT
Brian, could you write a better message describing this commit. The
current message doesn't seem to be correct.
bri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brianf
Date: Fri Feb 13 23:43:06 2009
New Revision: 744288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744288view=rev
Log:
use the new parent
Looks right to me. He switched some poms to use a different parent,
and then (I presume) shuffled the repository items to allow resolution
of that new parent artifact. No?
Christian
On 15-Feb-09, at 10:10 , Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Brian, could you write a better message describing this
Brian,
On 14/02/2009, at 7:43 AM, bri...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?rev=744288r1=744287r2=744288view=diff
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
==
---
Isn't modifying the ASF POM premature? I'm not sure if other projects
are using the POM or not (they should be), but they may not be using
this system.
There are a few other projects looking to use the new structure and this
would make it easier for them to do. Projects not using the new
On 14/02/2009, at 10:11 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Isn't modifying the ASF POM premature? I'm not sure if other projects
are using the POM or not (they should be), but they may not be using
this system.
There are a few other projects looking to use the new structure and
this
would make it
I do like the hook to get people to actually use the parent POM, but
at the same time it feels back to front (We probably don't need
another pom release, but if we did that would then have to be a
fork...). What about having them use the properties as their distMgmt
settings for now?
We
10 matches
Mail list logo
