Re: MNG-6174 for Maven 3.5.1

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
+1, we'll never going to support model 3.0.0. This will be different when introducing model 5.0.0; in that case we will need both. On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:07:51 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, I would like to integrate MNG-6174[1] into Maven 3.5.1 (master)..

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Compiler 3.6.2

2017-07-30 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I have rechecked the whole log files (testing my release checker script ;-() of the runs and found the following for the JDK 9 tests: And yes the error message is correct cause the "modules" in the JDK 9 is a single file and not a directory...(was there change?)... [ERROR] Failed to

Re: MNG-6123 for Maven 3.5.1

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
I'm missing the code change, I see only IT changes. On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:03:15 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, I would like to integrate MNG-6123[1] into Maven 3.5.1 (master)..which needs a small change to one of the integration tests[2] The IT's are fine

Re: MNG-6174 for Maven 3.5.1

2017-07-30 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi On 30/07/17 12:58, Robert Scholte wrote: +1, we'll never going to support model 3.0.0. I hope so ;-).. This will be different when introducing model 5.0.0; in that case we will need both. This is small step into this direction and to make a kind of housekeeping.. which makes it

Re: MNG-6123 for Maven 3.5.1

2017-07-30 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Robert, On 30/07/17 12:56, Robert Scholte wrote: I'm missing the code change, I see only IT changes. Sure...missed the link: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=65bb3030193db6b5c0d55c0f00f94f2dc77b801d On the branch:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Maven Compiler 3.6.2

2017-07-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1: Stephane, Robert, Herve, Karl, Olivier I will finish release process. Cheers -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Compiler 3.6.2

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, All these tests are actually testing other libraries: error-prone-compiler: javac-with-errorprone groovy-project-with-new-plexus-compiler: groovy-eclipse-compiler MCOMPILER-197: true So it means that those libraries nor Java 9 ready, but the maven-compiler-plugin itself is. Robert

Re: MNG-6123 for Maven 3.5.1

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Karl Heinz, comparing the key is often good enough, but I wonder if we should include the packaging type as well. On the other hand, if there's another module with the same GA, then you'll have an issue as well. Would be good to add a comment here that says ignoring type and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin version 3.0.0-M1

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:58:53 +0200, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi, We solved 14 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12330768=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[ANN] Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin 3.0.0-M1 Released

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin, version 3.0.0-M1 The Enforcer plugin provides goals to control certain environmental constraints such as Maven version, JDK version and OS family along with many more standard rules and user

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin version 3.0.0-M1

2017-07-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Peter Ansell, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Manfred Moser, Olivier Lamy, Stephane Nicoll, Hervé BOUTEMY, Robert Scholte PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:58:53 +0200, Robert Scholte

[GitHub] maven-indexer issue #17: Migration to Lucene 6.1.0

2017-07-30 Thread olamy
Github user olamy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/17 @scela fair enough. But as Lucene API change really often... Maybe migrate to the latest now so we are safe for a bit of time :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this