Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

2023-06-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Le ven. 16 juin 2023, 19:20, Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > Le mercredi 14 juin 2023, 10:07:46 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > I think this is exactly what Hervé explains was rejected years ago. The > > assumption is that the POM v4 is "set in amber" and will never change, at > > least for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.12

2023-06-17 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, Just FTR, the 1.9.12 release staging repository changed to: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1965/ This is SAME source release as maven-1962 (vote original staging repository) as SHA512 shows, in fact, EVERY binary is identical (checksum wise) as well, given

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.12

2023-06-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Le sam. 17 juin 2023 à 02:50, Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > yes, same happened in 1.9.11: this is where I found this first, while > checking for Reproducible Central > > > https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-central/blob/master/content/org/apache/maven/resolver/maven-resolver/README.md

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.12

2023-06-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Wouldnt it mean we are sure it was not consommed? Can we check it on nexus? That said not a blocker today for me since most downstream binaries are not reproducible anyway. Le sam. 17 juin 2023 à 08:56, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le sam. 17 juin 2023 à 02:50, Hervé Boutemy a > écrit : > > >