Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Christian Stein
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17

[RESULT][VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Benjamin Marwell
Hi all, the vote has passed with the following result: PMC +1: Anders Hammar, Arnaud Héritier, Benjamin Marwell, Guillaume Nodet, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Konrad Windszus, ,Maarten Mulders, Olivier Lamy, Romain Manni-Bucau, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák PMC majority quorum:

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 08:31 Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Robert Dean
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java

[VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0

2024-03-02 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I've staged release candidates for maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0 at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2067 JIRA release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MSHARED/versions/12353084

RE: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Jeremy Landis
You should be able to use @code in same way now without the java upgrade. * * {@code * * -Xmaxerrs * 1000 * -Xlint * -J-Duser.language=en_us * * } * Something like that anyways and all the ugly escapes can go now.

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0

2024-03-02 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
+1 sob., 2 mar 2024, 10:48 użytkownik Guillaume Nodet napisał: > I've staged release candidates for maven-filtering-3.3.2 and > maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0 at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2067 > > JIRA release notes: >

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Just realized since I'm working on the Maven compiler plugin, upgrading to Java 21 instead of 17 would allow us to replace currently hard-to-read Javadoc like this: * * compilerArgs * arg-Xmaxerrs/arg * arg1000/arg * arg-Xlint/arg *

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0

2024-03-02 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
I don't see any blockers with either of these. However, the maven-remote-resources-plugin repo is currently broken because it depends on the new maven-filtering. I would prefer to vote on and release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and only then vote on and release maven-remote-resources-plugin- 3.2.0. On

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-03-02 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Le 2024-03-02 à 18 h 55, Jeremy Landis a écrit : You should be able to use @code in same way now without the java upgrade. Yes I know. But Maven source code currently uses , and if we were to spent an effort for changing that, it would have been more economical to go directly to {@snippet}