Nice, I'll try this asap.
Thx!
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought this might be of interest to some people here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARCHIVA/Setting+up+Archiva+in+Eclipse+with+Q4E
Congratulations ! :-)
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Fabrice Bellingard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, good news!
:-)
--
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The board approved the resolution we submitted,
Great news! :-)
Thanks everyone and congratulations!
-Deng
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The board approved the resolution we submitted, so Archiva is now a TLP.
I look forward to working with you all on moving forward with this!
Cheers,
Hi,
Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat
Mar 29th to do the SVN move?
I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
than interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I
suggest the infrastructure repository). Carlos -
__
/\_ / \
/`/@),| Hallmark Alpaca sends his |
| (~' __|Congratulations to all of the |
_,--.___/ |\ Apache Archiva Devs on
Greetings,
I use Archiva running in tomcat (latest stable) and I was wondering
about a problem I am having. I was able to add a user to archiva for the
purposes of using the repository. The user is a Global Repository
Manager as well as Global Repository Observer. In addition I have tried
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
than interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I
suggest the infrastructure repository). Carlos - wdyt?
doesnt really matter as long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nicolas,
I won't speak for Brian, but I thought his intention was to lock down
plug-ins that only affect the build cycle.
Shouldn't the generated reports of a release also be reproducable? However,
anone noticed that a plugin with a locked version in the
The reporting section ignores pluginManagement, which is said to be a
feature, but IMHO it violates the principle of least suprise and it's a bug.
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Jörg Schaible schreef:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nicolas,
I won't speak for Brian, but I thought his
I agree this should be fixed, as there is no reportingManagement section
in POM to force the report plugin versions and the version element is
optional in reporting.
Nico.
2008/3/20, Geoffrey De Smet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The reporting section ignores pluginManagement, which is said to be a
When discussing about mirroring, you could also consider
http://www.metalinker.org/
Also, the full control of the repository (or mirrors) you use is a
critical security feature. You must be sure that you can trust the
repositories you use, and the authenticity of the jar that are on this
Hi,
The problem here is the phase in the life cycle.. The best thing would
be to use the generated application.xml from the ear plugin but thats
generated very late in the packaging phase. The eclipse plugin runs in a
very early phase to be able to generate eclipse config files also for
broken
I was curious about this too. Note that there is a goal in the
apt-maven-plugin that aims to achieve this:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/apt-maven-plugin/eclipse-mojo.html
Mark
On 19/03/2008, Evan Worley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering who the active developers are on the maven
I brought this up in the past the maven guys were adamant that they were
not able to get per test information to output on the console unless
testng changed. I felt all along that this was not correct and I
finally had a chance to look into it. Surefire could simply register a
listener to get
I brought this up in the past the maven guys were adamant that they were
not able to get per test information to output on the console unless
testng changed. I felt all along that this was not correct and I
finally had a chance to look into it. Surefire could simply register a
listener to get
We could also think to extract some part of ear/war/... plugins to
reuse some services throught a shared library
Arnaud
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Richard van Nieuwenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The problem here is the phase in the life cycle.. The best thing would
be to use
Richard,
I've noticed the plugin does invoke
ear:generate-application-xmlhttp://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/generate-application-xml-mojo.htmlgoal
- may be the lifecycle isn't a problem here?
I agree with Arnaud, that way we could keep up with plugins and be more
consistent.
There's already a jira for it, scheduled for 2.1 as it introduces new elements
to the poms.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nicolas de loof
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:07 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [Pre-Vote] release
Hi,
i also agree with Arnaud that this would be great but i think it is
almost not do-able. I tried for example to use the plexus manifest
generator (= service reuse) but failed because the dependencies are not
yet resolved (or something simulator) when the eclipse plugin starts.
Now to the
I read about the new import scope in the 2.0.9 release notes. This
looks very promising to me, but I have a questions on the details of
how this works.
I looked in the mailing list history for discussions on this feature,
but couldn't find anything. There is a wiki page, but it has few
details
I have recently been dealing with a similar issue. I wanted Junit style
reports and did not want to use ant run to run the JunitConverter task,
so I added reportng as a test scoped dependency and configured a
listener.
As an interim solution, you could write a listener that does what you
want.
I read about the new import scope in the 2.0.9 release notes. This
looks very promising to me, but I have a questions on the details of
how this works.
I looked in the mailing list history for discussions on this feature,
but couldn't find anything. There is a wiki page, but it has few
details
Yeah, I have no problem writing my own. However, if this is to be
expected of TestNG users to get similar output as previous versions of
surefire, then it should be WELL documented as such.
My issue is that the behavior changed between surefire versions. This
caused all kinds of confusion for
I did try it. I created my own listener and got the exact output I was
looking for. I am not sure where our disconnect is here, but we
certainly are seeing two different things with respect to the code.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Maybe our disconnect is about callbacks after the class vs. the method.
That could be where the misunderstanding is coming from.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Chaffee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven
I did not run your project. I created my own listener and ran it in
testng, outside of maven in a test environment at my company. I will
have to create a different one before I can share it with a wider
audience and I would like to actually test it in maven and with surefire
to see if the
Jason Chaffee wrote:
Maybe our disconnect is about callbacks after the class vs. the method.
That could be where the misunderstanding is coming from.
Sure, that could be. I claim that logging per-method is *way* too much
logging. Don't you agree?
In JUnit we can log per-class or
Jason Chaffee wrote:
I did not run your project.
Well, try it and get back to me. You can use that as a starting point for
reproducing the effect you actually want.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Jason Chaffee wrote:
I did not run your project.
Well, try it and get back to me. You can use that as a starting point for
reproducing the effect you actually want.
Oops, you can't, because the mailing list software stripped my attachment.
You can get a copy here:
Thanks Dan, I will take a look at it and make sure we are clear and
there aren't any misunderstandings before I make any more comments. :)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:43 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven Users
Jason Chaffee wrote:
Thanks Dan, I will take a look at it and make sure we are clear and
there aren't any misunderstandings before I make any more comments. :)
For future reference, this is SUREFIRE-457. Vote for it if you like, but
as far as I know, we can't fix it on the Surefire side
Thanks Dana for the nice summary.
Dan, one thing I did not take into account is that my company my be
using TestNG in a different way, such as group of tests, that allows
this to work for me and would cause different output for a standard
user. Think this was a good summary that helped to point
I think part of the disconnect might be in the understanding of what
TestNG calls a test. A test, in testNG terminology, is a logical
grouping of testMethods within a suite. A single test will span all
of the classes in the src/test/java directory unless something is done
to break them up.
Very cool! Thanks for sharing mark.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was curious about this too. Note that there is a goal in the
apt-maven-plugin that aims to achieve this:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/apt-maven-plugin/eclipse-mojo.html
Mark
On
We uncovered a regression in 2.0.9 somehow related to the plugin tools:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3473
John is helping me to track it down, but we'll end up respinning this
release again.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
Does anyone know where the apt-maven-plugin can be found?
mvnrepository.comhas no entries for it.
Thanks,
Evan
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Evan Worley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very cool! Thanks for sharing mark.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google knows all:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclientie=utf-8oe=utf-8q=apt-
maven-plugin
Looks like it's at codehaus.
-Original Message-
From: Evan Worley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:40 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Eclipse plugin
Yes Google does.. Thanks Brian, I guess mvnrepository doesn't index snapshot
repos.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Google knows all:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclientie=utf-8oe=utf-8q=apt-
Brian E. Fox wrote:
I read about the new import scope in the 2.0.9 release notes. This
looks very promising to me, but I have a questions on the details of
how this works.
I looked in the mailing list history for discussions on this feature,
but couldn't find anything. There is a wiki page, but
The design pattern I would recommend is one where the pom being
imported
contains nothing but the managed dependencies, i.e. it defines a
library
of related artifacts. You wouldn't use such a pom in any other way so I
don't see this as a compatibility problem.
But any poms that are
Tom Huybrechts wrote:
I read about the new import scope in the 2.0.9 release notes. This
looks very promising to me, but I have a questions on the details of
how this works.
I looked in the mailing list history for discussions on this feature,
but couldn't find anything. There is a wiki page,
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (29 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-3313NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than
This vote passes:
+1 binding from jvanzyl, olamy, vsiveton
+1 non-binding from dkulp, jdillon
Thanks!
Dan
On Monday 17 March 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Several projects are sucessfully using remote-resources so it's time
pull it out of beta and do the 1.0 release. :-)
This version provides
This vote passes:
+1 binding from jvanzyl, brianf, jdcasey, vsiveton
+1 non-binding from dkulp, malevi, jdillon
No other votes.
Thanks!
Dan
On Monday 17 March 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
There is a critical bug in 1.0 where the resulting merged NOTICE files
may not be correct. This release
This vote passes:
+1 binding: jvanzyl, brianf, olamy, vsiveton
+1 non-binding: jdillon, mtalevi, dkulp
Thanks!
Dan
On Monday 17 March 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The
My gut is that the configuration in settings.xml should always be an
absolute path. The way this user (in MECLIPSE-404) is using the
configuration is simply an anti-pattern.
Wayne
On 3/18/08, Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the recent release of maven-eclipse-plugin:2.5 brought
46 matches
Mail list logo
