Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Adrien Rivard
Hi, [MCOMPILER-159] - generatedSourcesDirectory should be included in list provided by org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject.getCompileClasspathElements() is closed as duplicate of MCOMPILER-157 which is unresolved (in JIRA at least). So what is the status here ? On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/11/16 Adrien Rivard adrien.riv...@gmail.com: Hi, [MCOMPILER-159] - generatedSourcesDirectory should be included in list provided by org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject.getCompileClasspathElements() is closed as duplicate of MCOMPILER-157 which is unresolved (in JIRA at least). So

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 Arnaud On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Compiler 3.0 We fixed 9 issues. http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18537styleName=TextprojectId=11130Create=Create Staging repository:

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Graham
I prefer classname based, as it is, by definition, definative. If you're concerned about details getting lost, then might I suggest that you route that logging output to a separate file? trace.log works for me (and give a -D to allow users to change that as well). -Chris On Fri, Nov 16, 2012

Re: Release Request: maven-rar-plugin

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Graham
I would like to ask that the 2.3-SNAPSHOT version of the RAR plugin is released. I've tested it and I'm happy with it. Thanks, -Chris On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All. I've managed to download, build and successfully test the new

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Benson Margulies
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer classname based, as it is, by definition, definative. If you're concerned about details getting lost, then might I suggest that you route that logging output to a separate file? trace.log works for me (and give

Re: Release Request: maven-rar-plugin

2012-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
My bad I missed that. After compiler plugin I will release it. 2012/11/16 Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com: I would like to ask that the 2.3-SNAPSHOT version of the RAR plugin is released. I've tested it and I'm happy with it. Thanks, -Chris On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Chris

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer classname based, as it is, by definition, definative. If you're concerned about details getting lost, then might I suggest that you

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
And additionally figure what markers might be necessary. So the class name takes care of any hierarchical filtering, and then you get into domain specific filtering. Say you instrumented markers across artifact resolution, or plugin resolution, local repository operations. Many of the markers

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 16 Nov 2012, at 14:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: And additionally figure what markers might be necessary. So the class name takes care of any hierarchical filtering, and then you get into domain specific filtering. Say you instrumented markers across artifact resolution, or plugin

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Compiler 3.0 We fixed 9 issues. http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18537styleName=TextprojectId=11130Create=Create Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.4

2012-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, We solved 29 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11126styleName=Htmlversion=18308 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/11/16 Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io: On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer classname based, as it is, by definition, definative. If you're concerned about details

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 16, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2012/11/16 Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io: On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer classname based, as it

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 16, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 Nov 2012, at 14:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: And additionally figure what markers might be necessary. So the class name takes care of any hierarchical filtering, and then you get into domain specific filtering. Say

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 S. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Compiler 3.0 We fixed 9 issues. http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18537styleName=TextprojectId=11130Create=Create Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Cc: Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0 +1 S. On

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two single and one multi-module project. Regards Mirko On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com To: Maven Developers List

Re: Release Planning and Roadmap

2012-11-16 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi there, i have cloned the Maven-3 repo from github and started to dive into the following task. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5245 I have checked the default-bindings.xml in maven-core and found something interesting. Can someone give me a hint what the par packaging is and in

Re: Release Planning and Roadmap

2012-11-16 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, Can someone give me a hint what the par packaging is and in particular where to find the maven-par-plugin ...cause i can't find a maven-par-plugin except from springsource ... ah i was to fast...now i found that is related to android development ... Kind regards Karl-Heinz --

Re: Release Planning and Roadmap

2012-11-16 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, now coming up with an other question (related to MNG-5245): I'm checking the default-bindings.xml file in maven-core and found that in the ejb packaging type the maven-ejb-plugin is pinned to 2.3 whereas in the ejb3 packaging type the maven-ejb-plugin is not pinned to any version.

maven-3 pull request: [MNG-5245] Update maven plugin versions

2012-11-16 Thread khmarbaise
GitHub user khmarbaise opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-3/pull/5 [MNG-5245] Update maven plugin versions - components.xml - maven-clean-plugin up to 2.5 - maven-site-plugin up to 3.1 - default-bindings.xml - maven-install-plugin up to 2.4

Re: Release Planning and Roadmap

2012-11-16 Thread Anders Hammar
I'm confused here. org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-ejb3-plugin doesn't exist! I didn't even know there was an ejb3 packaging type. /Anders On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.dewrote: Hi, now coming up with an other question (related to MNG-5245): I'm

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/11/16 Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com: On 16 Nov 2012, at 14:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: And additionally figure what markers might be necessary. So the class name takes care of any hierarchical filtering, and then you get into domain specific filtering. Say you instrumented markers

maven-3 pull request: [MNG-5245] Update maven plugin versions

2012-11-16 Thread khmarbaise
Github user khmarbaise closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-3/pull/5 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

maven-surefire pull request: forkMode onceperthread (SUREFIRE-751) (licence...

2012-11-16 Thread agudian
GitHub user agudian opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/10 forkMode onceperthread (SUREFIRE-751) (licence headers included) In relation to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-751 Adds a new forkMode option onceperthread, that

maven-surefire pull request: forkMode onceperthread (SUREFIRE-751)

2012-11-16 Thread agudian
Github user agudian closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/8 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Graham
Not that I'd ever ever do this, as the performance would be horrid, but: In the existing logger impl throw and catch an exception and get the *calling* class from the stack back trace. Utterly horrid but it is doable. But is works with all existing plugins and code with out any refactoring (ie

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Graham
I would not over simplify it. Application tracing is an implicitly complex or verbose means of generating application execution trace output. If you're talking about turning on/off specific mojo tracing it is implicitly technical and a nitty gritty fine tuning operation. I think it would be a

maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-927] Added support for TestNG config...

2012-11-16 Thread kobikis
Github user kobikis closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org