GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/17
Proposed use of New JUnit ParallelComputer in Surefire
I agreed with @krosenvold to push the first changes on the use of
ParallelComputer in Surefire.
We have to decide whether we
The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
something go wrong in the latest release, or did this happen in the cms
switch?
/Anders
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net:
The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
something go wrong in the latest release, or did this happen in the cms
switch?
must work.
Nobody upgraded that.
So feel free to test it and do the upgrade.
/Anders
--
Olivier
Yes, I want to start the build of other projects if new version of the
promoted artifact is available.
Imagine a larger project in which 15-50 modules exists. Top level
module build is triggered by the available new modules with a specific
status i.e. performance tests run when new version of the
+1
Need one more PMC vote ;)
Kristian
2012/12/17 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 3 issues
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761version=17432
There are 2 issues left in jira;
I'm quite sure I deployed that, but that's a bit of a worthless point
in these days ;)
K
Den 20. des. 2012 kl. 18:01 skrev Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net:
The site for m-plugin-p is for 3.1, not the latest 3.2 version. Did
something go wrong in the
Would be happy to do it, but I have to admit that I'm not sure of the
process now. Is the docs [1] correct?
So mvn site-deploy -Preporting on the right version should do it?
/Anders
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-plugin-release.html
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM,
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net:
Would be happy to do it, but I have to admit that I'm not sure of the
process now. Is the docs [1] correct?
So mvn site-deploy -Preporting on the right version should do it?
I started a bit of documentation here
euh I just checked
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847view=markup
and it's 3.2 :-)
see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002r2=1410738diff_format=h
2012/12/20 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar
euh I just checked
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847view=markup
and it's 3.2 :-)
see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002r2=1410738diff_format=h
maven-site-plugin? I don't follow.
/Anders
2012/12/20 Olivier Lamy
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net:
euh I just checked
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?revision=1419847view=markup
and it's 3.2 :-)
see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/pom.xml?r1=1408002r2=1410738diff_format=h
maven-site-plugin? I don't follow.
Looks like a typo: 'p' too much...
Op Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:54:07 +0100 schreef krosenv...@apache.org:
else if ( junit.framework.AssertiponFailedError.equals(
target.getClass().getName() )
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Robert
Op Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:17:24 +0100 schreef Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
+1
Need one more PMC vote ;)
Kristian
2012/12/17 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 3 issues
Let me try to clarify:
The site shows the wrong version of the maven-plugin-plugin.
Actually, everything under http://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/ refers to
3.1 instead of 3.2
Robert
Op Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:31:35 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
2012/12/20 Anders Hammar
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 17 décembre 2012 16:33:25 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 3 issues
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761version=174
32
There are 2 issues left in jira;
oh ok
Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
I will fix that.
2012/12/20 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
Let me try to clarify:
The site shows the wrong version of the maven-plugin-plugin.
Actually, everything under http://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/ refers to
Thanks Olivier!
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
oh ok
Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
I will fix that.
2012/12/20 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
Let me try to clarify:
The site shows the wrong version
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Olivier, Robert, Hervé, Kristian
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
(I will complete the release paperwork for verifier and m-s-u later tonight)
Kristian
I suppose it logically must be so that a typo points to missing test
coverage Well not this typo - any more!
Thanks,
Kristian
Den 21. des. 2012 kl. 00:58 skrev Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
Looks like a typo: 'p' too much...
Op Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:54:07 +0100 schreef
I expect that when I run mvn -X (3.0.4), I'll see the actual
configuration values in use in the mojo.
With the license-maven-plugin, whatever I do, I see just XML templates like:
useMissingFile
default-value=false${license.useMissingFile}/useMissingFile
Any value I actually configure is not
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of
maven-shared-utils, version 0.2
This project aims to be a functional replacement for
{{{http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils}plexus-utils}} in Maven.
It is not a 100% API compatible replacement though but a replacement
with improvements:
No, license.excludedGroups is the java system property you specify on
command-line to configure. The name of the parameter itself is what you
configure in the pom.
/Anders
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
@Parameter( property =
ok
can you explain the ant/ivy build pipeline implementing promotion you did with
the help of my team mates?
(notice I won't be here for 1 week, so won't be able to continue the
discussion for the moment, but the topic is worth more discussion)
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2012
You're looking at the wrong place. The xml stuff is listed early in the
build output (before any plugin execution), but what you're looking for is
listed in the beginning of the execution of the plugin in question.
/Anders
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Benson Margulies
I see this has been fixed now. Merci!
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
Thanks Olivier!
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
oh ok
Apologize my bad I read too fast the acronym from Anders :-)
I
25 matches
Mail list logo
