[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #126: MCOMPILER-306 Fix `compilerArgs` example us...
GitHub user Stephan202 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/126 MCOMPILER-306 Fix `compilerArgs` example usage You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/PicnicSupermarket/maven-plugins bugfix/MCOMPILER-306 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/126.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #126 commit bb0113a07fdce8ae76b326b916c0b12924b47157 Author: Stephan SchroeversDate: 2017-08-19T21:34:42Z MCOMPILER-306 Fix `compilerArgs` example usage --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.1.0
Hi Robert, tested via: mvn -Prun-its clean verify the following combinations: jdk1.7.0_79.jdk apache-maven-3.0.5 apache-maven-3.1.1 apache-maven-3.2.5 apache-maven-3.3.1 apache-maven-3.3.9 apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk1.8.0_131.jdk apache-maven-3.0.5 apache-maven-3.1.1 apache-maven-3.2.5 apache-maven-3.3.1 apache-maven-3.3.9 apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk1.8.0_144.jdk apache-maven-3.0.5 apache-maven-3.1.1 apache-maven-3.2.5 apache-maven-3.3.1 apache-maven-3.3.9 apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk1.9.0_ea+181.jdk apache-maven-3.0.5 apache-maven-3.1.1 apache-maven-3.2.5 apache-maven-3.3.1 apache-maven-3.3.9 apache-maven-3.5.0 The only thing I found are the following related to JDK 9: [INFO] ..SUCCESS (5.5 s) [INFO] Building: dep-reduced-pom/pom.xml [INFO] run script verify.groovy WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass$3$1 (file:/Users/kama/.m2/repository/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy/2.0.1/groovy-2.0.1.jar) to method java.lang.Object.finalize() WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass$3$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release [INFO] ..SUCCESS (4.1 s) [INFO] Building: dep-reduced-pom-relocated-result/pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (2.7 s) [INFO] Building: dep-reduced-pom-unique/pom.xml So +1 from me... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 19/08/17 16:01, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12339197=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317921%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1357/ https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1357/content/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/3.1.0/maven-shade-plugin-3.1.0-source-release.zip Source release checksum(s): maven-shade-plugin-3.1.0-source-release.zip sha1: 3d1012e380c5bb6d88f51a298aa302022a39e1ad Staging site: https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-shade-plugin-LATEST/ Guide to testing staged releases: https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html Note: This is a Java 9 support release. Be aware when using this on jars with module descriptors; it's intended strong encapsulation (i.e. not exported packages) will be lost. This is actually a JVM issue which is hopefully resolved in a future version of Java. Vote open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #157: SUREFIRE-1383 dependenciesToScan Does Not Leverag...
Github user owenfarrell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/157 @Tibor17 - thoughts? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.1.0
Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12339197=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317921%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1357/ https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1357/content/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/3.1.0/maven-shade-plugin-3.1.0-source-release.zip Source release checksum(s): maven-shade-plugin-3.1.0-source-release.zip sha1: 3d1012e380c5bb6d88f51a298aa302022a39e1ad Staging site: https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-shade-plugin-LATEST/ Guide to testing staged releases: https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html Note: This is a Java 9 support release. Be aware when using this on jars with module descriptors; it's intended strong encapsulation (i.e. not exported packages) will be lost. This is actually a JVM issue which is hopefully resolved in a future version of Java. Vote open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven JIRA Projects - Issue Type
Hi, so based on the feedback I will go back to INFRA and let them configure a separate Configuration type "Maven Issue Type Scheme" which contains the issue type "Dependency Upgrade"... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 18/08/17 20:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi to all, I have realized that in MASSEMBLY it is possible to define an issue Type "Dependency Upgrade" which is very feasible for our projects... So I have asked INFRA[1] if we could have that for our other JIRA projects as wellSo the now we can decide between three options: A) switch your other schemes to match MASSEMBLY - meaning in addition to getting 'Dependency Upgrade' you also get add additional 30+ others you dont use. B) Create a Maven Issue Type Scheme, adding 'Dependency Upgrade' to the default. C) Nothing. So I would vote for option "B" ...The question is what do you think? Which options would you like to use in JIRA ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise More details in the issue. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14898 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: JDK9: Maven-JLink-Plugin, Maven-JMod-Plugin
Hi, JIRA entries for both Maven-JLink-Plugin and Maven-JMod-Plugin are now avaiable..Thanks to the fast work of INFRA Team. Thanks a lot to them... https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MJMOD https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MJLINK Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 15/08/17 22:15, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi Robert, I've taken a the liberaty to create INFRA[1] ticket which seemed be already working on... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14878 On 15/08/17 22:10, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, I think it makes sense to have these packaging plugins. Haven't looked at the code yet, but you can start with the preparations. I hope Brian is available to make this Jira projects. thanks, Robert On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:19:55 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaisewrote: Hi, I would like to start a first alpha release of those two plugins to have something in the wild to be used and see how the feedback would be What do you think? I would request JIRA projects for them Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org Mit freundlichem Gruß Karl-Heinz Marbaise Mit freundlichem Gruß Karl-Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl-Heinz MarbaiseUSt.IdNr: DE191347579 Hauptstrasse 177 52146 Würselen http://www.soebes.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[ANN] Apache Maven Assembly EJB Version 3.0.0 Released
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven EJB Plugin Version 3.0.0 This plugin generates J2EE Enterprise Javabean (EJB) file as well as the associated client jar. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ejb-plugin/ Important Note since 3.0.0: * Maven 3.X only * JDK 7 minimum requirement You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-ejb-plugin 3.0.0 You can download the appropriate sources etc. from the download page: https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ejb-plugin/download.cgi Release Notes Maven EJB Plugin 3.0.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317421=12330676 Bugs: * [MEJB-109] - JDK 9 - EA compatibility Issue Improvements: * [MEJB-72] - Add LifecycleMapping and ArtifactHandler from maven-core to target packaging plugin * [MEJB-81] - Upgrade to Maven 3.X only compatiblity * [MEJB-86] - Make naming of properties consistent * [MEJB-87] - Upgrade EJB Version default to 3.1 in accordance with Java EE 6 * [MEJB-88] - Change package to org.apache.maven.plugins to prevent conflict with Maven Core * [MEJB-92] - Make separate classifier for client and main aritfact * [MEJB-93] - Prevent re-adding of main artifact twice * [MEJB-94] - Make integration tests more reliable * [MEJB-97] - Remove param properties that doesn't make sense for CLI usage * [MEJB-101] - Upgrade maven-shared-components parent to version 30 * [MEJB-108] - Upgrade bound plugins to life cycle * [MEJB-113] - Move component.xml to correct location. Dependency Upgrades: * [MEJB-114] - Upgrade plexus-utils to version 3.1.0 * [MEJB-111] - Upgrade plexus-archiver to 3.5. * [MEJB-110] - Updated maven-archiver to 3.2.0 * [MEJB-107] - Upgrade of plexus-interpolation to 1.24. * [MEJB-106] - Upgrade of maven-archiver to 3.1.1. * [MEJB-105] - Upgrade of maven-archiver to 3.1.0. * [MEJB-104] - Upgrade of maven-filtering to 3.1.1. * [MEJB-103] - Upgrade of plexus-interpolation to 1.22. * [MEJB-102] - Upgrade of plexus-archiver to 3.4. * [MEJB-100] - Upgrade plexus-archiver from 3.2 to 3.3 * [MEJB-99] - Upgrade maven-filtering to 3.1.0 * [MEJB-98] - Upgrade maven-archiver to 3.0.2 * [MEJB-96] - Upgrade plexus-archiver to 3.1.1 * [MEJB-95] - Upgrade plexus-archiver from 3.0.1 to 3.0.3 * [MEJB-91] - Upgrade plexus-archiver from 2.10.2 to 3.0.1 * [MEJB-90] - Upgrade commons-io to 2.4 Enjoy, -The Apache Maven team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #162: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162 @Tibor17 when I run `mvn compile` I get: ``` Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.19.2-SNAPSHOT:compile contains org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/runorder/PrioritizedTest.class targeted to JDK 1.6 [WARNING] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EnforceBytecodeVersion failed with message: Found Banned Dependency: org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.19.2-SNAPSHOT ``` Jenkins Build is also red. I don't know how to fix this. Can you help? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #153: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153 See #162 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #162: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plat...
GitHub user britter opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162 SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (WIP) Followup for #153 This is Work in Progress! First take on a JUnitPlattform ProviderInfo, to enable automatic provider lookup. Need help to get things working :) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/britter/maven-surefire SUREFIRE-1384 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #162 commit 1a7dd9b84f8462fa841e015826b44c553ff64b5e Author: Benedikt RitterDate: 2017-06-08T12:46:04Z SUREFIRE-1384: Start implemeting JUnit Plattform ProviderInfo for automatic provider lookup --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #153: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plat...
Github user britter closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #153: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153 Opening a new PR against junit5 branch! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Release of jar signer suite next week
Hi All is in the subject :-) Cheers -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Maven JIRA Projects - Issue Type
B would be great. /Anders (mobile) Den 18 aug. 2017 20:53 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise": > Hi to all, > > I have realized that in MASSEMBLY it is possible to define an issue Type > "Dependency Upgrade" which is very feasible for our projects... > > So I have asked INFRA[1] if we could have that for our other JIRA projects > as wellSo the now we can decide between three options: > > > A) switch your other schemes to match MASSEMBLY - meaning in addition to > getting 'Dependency Upgrade' you also get add additional 30+ others you > dont use. > > B) Create a Maven Issue Type Scheme, adding 'Dependency Upgrade' to the > default. > > C) Nothing. > > > So I would vote for option "B" ...The question is what do you think? Which > options would you like to use in JIRA ? > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > More details in the issue. > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14898 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >