On 2019-10-19 23:55, Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote:
I always read the release notes very carefully and I don't mind seeing
individual JIRA's per upgrade, even if does increase the length of the
release notes. I guess others only want to see features and possibly bug
fixes. Personally I like
Yes Robert, thank you for the suggestions - more changes of this type will
be combined.
Sylwester
sob., 19 paź 2019 o 22:32 Robert Scholte napisał(a):
> Maybe it is me, be I don't think having a separate jira issue for every
> updated dependency adds value.
> It makes the release notes
Maybe it is me, be I don't think having a separate jira issue for every
updated dependency adds value.
It makes the release notes unnecessary long (in a time where people
already are bad readers).
As a user I expect dependency updates to be part of every release.
1 Jira item would be good
+1
sob., 19 paź 2019 o 21:06 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Le sam. 19 oct. 2019 à 20:31, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi Hervé,
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> > On 19.10.19 19:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 6
+1
Le sam. 19 oct. 2019 à 20:31, Karl Heinz Marbaise a
écrit :
> Hi Hervé,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> On 19.10.19 19:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 6 issues:
> >
>
Pretty sure that small changes that could not be done any other way are not
subject to copyright claims.
s/1.199/1.200/g
^ Being an example.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:51 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I see value in it.
> But from a legal point of viewthere is no human who sends the PR, so
I see value in it.
But from a legal point of viewthere is no human who sends the PR, so in
theory we cannot accept such patches, can we?
Enrico
Il sab 19 ott 2019, 20:26 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> The dependabot looks interesting, cli has more possibilities than a pure
> button on GUI.
>
Hi Hervé,
+1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 19.10.19 19:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12345174=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1531/
The dependabot looks interesting, cli has more possibilities than a pure
button on GUI.
>> does anyone enabled it
I am all the ear how it can be enabled.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:32 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Did you see dependabot on our repos?
>
> Like this automatic PR
>
>
+1
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:41 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12345174=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1531/
>
>
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12345174=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1531/
I am trying to explain to you in second thread that removing Guice will
remove all related issues.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 5:09 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
> Tibor,
>
> you're doing it again. The title of this topic is "Second MNG-6765
> ([Regression] tycho pom-less builds fails with 3.6.2)" and
Tibor,
you're doing it again. The title of this topic is "Second MNG-6765
([Regression] tycho pom-less builds fails with 3.6.2)" and none of your
comments helped on that, i.e. trying to move it forward.
Based on your reply you should a new discussion on the mailinglist.
Robert
ps. I won't
+1
Thank you Stuart
Maybe it would be better to add a test case so that we want break this
so-called corner-case in the future.
side note: if we create pull requests it is easier to review changes
Enrico
Il giorno ven 18 ott 2019 alle ore 20:04 Robert Scholte <
rfscho...@apache.org> ha
Robert we suffer from bad design in Maven. There is Jira issue where Maven
accepted these annotation maybe because they are so famous and I do not
remember if we had any Vote for this significant change. If there was a
Vote I would vote -1 and I would explain why.
We can talk about it in the
Tibor, please lower your voice.
You're turning this topic into an unnecessary fight.
We're solving a regression introduced in 3.6.2.
Stuart was able to identify the problem, provide the fix and clearly
explain what happened.
Code has been review, fix is confirmed, so we're good to go.
So
Stuart, you are wrong.
It is no more Java SE
It is JakartaEE ans if you want to obey wrong design of Java SE go for it
but then Maven would become a mess of Java EE annotations in non-EE
container.
Do you understand that @Name represents a key in the container? And how can
you create a string like
@Named is not specific to Java EE, it's from JSR 330 which actually targets
Java SE (and there are many SE based containers that support it)
All @Named does is give a component an identity in the container (think
of @Named like the hint in Plexus [1]) so it can be referenced by that name
OK, so this rabbit-hole is exactly what I wanted to avoid and which is why
I added a detailed description in the original patch (and not just the
annotation change)
To clarify: plugins and extensions can already override any component,
because their baseline priority is always higher than maven
Are you talking about
@Named( “not-default” )
@Named( “coreAllowingOverride” ) or @Named( “coreExtensionPoint” )?
In Java EE (and these annotations are from Java EE application servers)
mean the name of the bean which is unique - it is not a group of beans.
Please notice that beans container is
+1
just added a comment on a typo
for the name of the component, perhaps "core-default", but I won't complain
about any choice: the javadoc is what was really needed
notice: perhaps we have other component that should have the same improvement
to permit overriding in the future
Regards,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:25:47 +0200, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Inline:
On Oct 18, 2019, at 5:15 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Any string apart from "default" or the empty string will work here - I
happened to chose "core" because I viewed it as a core implementation.
Also a quick reminder that
22 matches
Mail list logo
