Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
Here my +1. 2012/5/21 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/ Staging site:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-05-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Mark Struberg, Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy +1 (non-binding): LeClaire Garvin, Anders Hammar I will continue release process. Thanks -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy |

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-22 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 (non-binding) Thanks Olivier! /Anders On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:16 PM, LeClaire Garvin garvin.lecla...@gmail.com wrote: +1 non-binding Regards, Garvin LeClaire garvin.lecla...@gmail.com On May 21, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3) +1 (non-binding) Thanks Olivier! /Anders

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-22 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 (binding) On 21 May 2012 14:51, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/ Staging

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-05-21 Thread Anders Hammar
I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the snapshot though, so I don't expect any issues. /Anders On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: It's not that easy. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-05-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Thanks for the polished ping :-) I will take care of that this week. 2012/5/21 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the snapshot though, so I don't expect any

[VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/ (wait sync)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)

2012-05-21 Thread LeClaire Garvin
+1 non-binding Regards, Garvin LeClaire garvin.lecla...@gmail.com On May 21, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-05-02 Thread Anders Hammar
If no settings specified, the maven invocation will use the default one (~/.m2/settings.xml) Actually it will use the settings of the calling process, which could be something different than the default file-based one. Due to corporate infrastructure reasons I couldn't test one of my actual

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-05-02 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, AFAIK no rush :-) So take the time to test your various use cases. 2012/5/2 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: If no settings specified, the maven invocation will use the default one (~/.m2/settings.xml) Actually it will use the settings of the calling process, which could be something

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-05-02 Thread Anders Hammar
It's not that easy. The corporate infrastructure only proxies central, not any snapshot repos. So I can't test a Snapshot version. So what I've done is verifying that the plugin now works with the new embedded Maven 3 feature of Hudson. Really my main goal and should be what I need for the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/4/29 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: Yes, I will. Will not happen until Wednesday though. (Holidays here in Sweden.) Regarding the flag, inheriting setitngs.xml by default from the invoking process if no settings.xml is specified in the flugin config is not implemented? I'm asking

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar
Yes, I will. Will not happen until Wednesday though. (Holidays here in Sweden.) Regarding the flag, inheriting setitngs.xml by default from the invoking process if no settings.xml is specified in the flugin config is not implemented? I'm asking based on mine and Stephen's discussion. /Anders On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
The buildjob is used to store the results of the invoked runs. That page describes the schema. Iirc I was to write a Jenkins plugin to parse them so that you could track the invoked tests in the trend graph... But I do get pulled every which way and it can take a while before I return to these

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
Good catch on the warning for activated profiles. They are activated in the maven build so the invoker plugin merge those setting with those eventually defined in the mojo configuration field (settingsFile ). What I can do is made this merge feature optional (off by default and add a debug flag to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
I actually think the merge feature is a step backwards and I am toying with being -1 on the commit. for proxies I think mrm-maven-plugin @ mojo is the way to go. invoker is a different use case from release, so passing through the settings is, in general, a bad thing. If you make the merge an

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
So vote cancelled again :-). I will make this merge optional (off by default). 2012/4/26 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: I actually think the merge feature is a step backwards and I am toying with being -1 on the commit. for proxies I think mrm-maven-plugin @ mojo is the way

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Anders Hammar
The problem I have with using the mrm-maven-plugin is that it would then require the pom to be updated. Here's a scenario: In an environment with no direct access to central but an internal MRM is used, which is configured in settings.xml. I download some open source project that uses the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 26 April 2012 12:01, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: The problem I have with using the mrm-maven-plugin is that it would then require the pom to be updated. Here's a scenario: In an environment with no direct access to central but an internal MRM is used, which is configured in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Anders Hammar
I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much always use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are cases where you might use invoker for something else, in which case you should not be specifying a custom settings.xml. I might be wrong, but this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much always use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are cases where you might use invoker for something else, in which case you should

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 26 April 2012 13:57, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.comwrote: On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much always use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
ok in order to try make all happy :-) I will make that configurable. @Anders I have pushed a snapshot with a new flag called mergeUserSettings. Can you try with your use case ? 2012/4/26 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: On 26 April 2012 13:57, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much always use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 26 April 2012 23:13, Robert Scholte apa...@sourcegrounds.com wrote: Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: I would argue that those

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 26 April 2012 23:18, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.comwrote: On 26 April 2012 23:13, Robert Scholte apa...@sourcegrounds.com wrote: Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: On 26

[VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-097/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/ (wait sync)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-25 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 (non-binding) /Anders On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:53, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository:

Re: Issue with parallelThreads Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Oliver, sorry for late answer ...but here is the result with settings parallelThreads to 5... [INFO] Installing /home/build/wc/appassembler/appassembler-maven-plugin/pom.xml to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, -1 (non binding) based on my reported problems... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029 Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579 52146 Würselen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i have a question concerning the parameters which given to instances of the invoker-plugin on command during execution of the integration test: Based on the files i've taken a look into it looks like there is a profile activated or added on default so far as i understand this is based

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 2)

2012-04-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, just an other question came to my mind What is the purpose of the http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/build-job.html It's given as a link in the docs? But i can't find an explanation which intention it has ? May be i oversight it simply ? Can someone enlighten me?

Re: Issue with parallelThreads Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
I'm interested to know the content of those build.log files. Note using parallel feature, you will need some resources on the machine running build because if you have a MAVEN_OPTS with a huge mx/ms this will be multiplicated by the number of parallel thread you are configuring. This

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-24 Thread Lukas Theussl
See http://maven.apache.org/doxia/issues/index.html#Verbatim_blocks_not_boxed I have fixed the apt sources. Cheers, -Lukas Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, i have checked the staged Site and observed that the frames around the source examples or code snippet are not there... For example

Issue with parallelThreads Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
Thanks Lukas for the fix. I have fixed too the parallelThreads trouble. @Karl can you test with your projects ? Thanks 2012/4/24 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org: See http://maven.apache.org/doxia/issues/index.html#Verbatim_blocks_not_boxed I have fixed the apt sources. Cheers, -Lukas

[VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-082/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/ Guide to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, /Anders On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 14:22, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6. We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 ) Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i just tested it on the current state of the appassembler-plugin (trunk) with integration-tests but results into the following. I have added simply parrallelThreads3/parrallelThreads to my configuration for the invoker-plugin plus of course the version to 1.6... May be i oversight

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, just tested an other project (https://github.com/khmarbaise/Maven-License-Verifier-Plugin) I have added simply parrallelThreads3/parrallelThreads to my configuration for the invoker-plugin plus of course the version to 1.6... with the following result: [INFO] [INFO] ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i have checked the staged Site and observed that the frames around the source examples or code snippet are not there... For example if you compare http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/examples/invoker-properties.html

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
good catch too. I didn't test the parrallelThreads stuff So I cancel the vote. 2012/4/23 Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de: Hi, i have checked the staged Site and observed that the frames around the source examples or code snippet are not there... For example if you compare

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Janes
While you're there, parallel rather than parrallel, please! On 23/04/12 05:14 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: good catch too. I didn't test the parrallelThreads stuff So I cancel the vote. 2012/4/23 Karl Heinz Marbaisekhmarba...@gmx.de: Hi, i have checked the staged Site and observed that the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6

2012-04-23 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
HI, I have added simply parrallelThreads3/parrallelThreads Of course this should be written: parallelThreads... Just a typo... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029