Am 12/30/16 um 19:05 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> Focus on the versions we have released.
That IT also fails with Maven 3.3.9 due to the same reason.
[ERROR] The following builds failed:
[ERROR] * projects\basic-features\space & special char\pom.xml
Am 12/30/16 um 22:06 schrieb Christian Schulte:
> Am 12/30/16 um 19:05 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
>> Given that I'm not seeing any objections yet to throwing out 3.4.x and
>> redoing via cherry-pick as 3.5.x I think we should forget about any tests
>> run with 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs
>>
>> Focus on the
Am 12/30/16 um 19:05 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> Given that I'm not seeing any objections yet to throwing out 3.4.x and
> redoing via cherry-pick as 3.5.x I think we should forget about any tests
> run with 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs
>
> Focus on the versions we have released.
The IT is running with
Given that I'm not seeing any objections yet to throwing out 3.4.x and
redoing via cherry-pick as 3.5.x I think we should forget about any tests
run with 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs
Focus on the versions we have released.
On Fri 30 Dec 2016 at 17:17, Guillaume Boué wrote:
>
>
> Le
Le 30/12/2016 à 17:21, Christian Schulte a écrit :
Am 12/30/16 um 11:00 schrieb Guillaume Boué:
Hi Christian,
I remember adding those 2 ITs after raising a concern on dev (see
attached mail). They were passing with 3.3.9 and latest 3.4.0 at that time.
Is there an issue updating those tests
I'm developing both on Windows and on a Ubuntu VM. The 2 ITs passed with
the two systems with 3.0.5, 3.3.9 and 3.4.0 before the log format change
in MNG-5457. I went ahead and committed an update to take account for
that (the tests no longer rely on reading the logs).
If you want to test unit
Am 12/30/16 um 11:00 schrieb Guillaume Boué:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I remember adding those 2 ITs after raising a concern on dev (see
> attached mail). They were passing with 3.3.9 and latest 3.4.0 at that time.
>
> Is there an issue updating those tests with regard to MNG-5457? I
> noticed this
Am 12/30/16 um 15:47 schrieb Christian Schulte:
> Am 12/30/16 um 11:00 schrieb Guillaume Boué:
>> Is there an issue updating those tests with regard to MNG-5457?
>
> I do not have a Windows box. Issue was due to the ITs failing on
> Windows. I verified the scripts compile with groovy locally.
Am 12/30/16 um 11:00 schrieb Guillaume Boué:
> Is there an issue updating those tests with regard to MNG-5457?
I do not have a Windows box. Issue was due to the ITs failing on
Windows. I verified the scripts compile with groovy locally. Currently
there still seems to be an issue with the Windows
Hi Christian,
I remember adding those 2 ITs after raising a concern on dev (see
attached mail). They were passing with 3.3.9 and latest 3.4.0 at that time.
Is there an issue updating those tests with regard to MNG-5457? I
noticed this is the 5th commit changing it (which I think is a lot),
10 matches
Mail list logo