Congrats, way to go
Regards,
Sam Chen | APJ Country Director | DC/OS Evangelist
> Build and run modern apps
> at scale using DC/OS
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 5:08 AM, Yan Xu wrote:
>
> Hi Mesos devs and users,
>
> Please welcome James Peach as a new Apache Mesos committer
Quick clarification: you'll have a single `process::Executor` and queue up
all the rmdirs on that, correct? So you'll still tie up a worker thread,
but only one of them.
Either way it makes sense to add `process::Executor::execute()`. I'm happy
to shepherd that for you Chun, send me a patch!
On
Im trying to study mesos for my project and i need to create some tasks and
do a health check on them. can you tell me the exact waay i should create
the tasks to do so
Hey Ben,
There was a change sometime after Mesos 1.0.x (I think) that altered how
the leader state was obtained
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/webui/master/static/js/controllers.js#L362-L364
This seems to be an intended change but this causes UI error modals to
continually pop
Hi all:
Why does Mesos authorization not support the LDAP or Kerberos?
I am thinking to implement the Mesos module for authorization.
Thank you.
Hi,
I'm thinking about extending `process::Executor` with a new `execute()`
interface.
The need of this new interface surfaced when I'm working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7964
Summary:
1. A disk GC might execute multiple `rmdirs` callbacks, and some of them
are heavy duty. We
On 2017-08-20 05:43, butech tech wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What is the status of this integration? We decided to adopt Mesos as a core
> component of our infrastructure and we have recently found out that our
> users have significant need for Kubernetes. Being able to support
Hi folks,
Over time the webui has lagged behind for some of the features that have
been added. I'm currently tracking what's required to catch it up here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6440
If you know of other features that make sense to display in the webui, feel
free to file a
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 5:29 AM, Benjamin Bannier
> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> I'd like to make a longer comment here to make it easier to discuss.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Note the proposal to alter how Timer metrics are exposed in an incompatible
>> way (I argue this is