odk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Curious to know more about what 2) looks like.
> >
>
>
> We would be maintaining a remote branch called "asf-site", similar to how
>
+1 (binding)
Looks like ExamplesTest.DynamicReservationFramework is flaky, unfortunately
wasn't able to get the logs for a failed run.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not a blocker, but noticed the parallel test runner isn't bundled in the
If I understood correctly, the proposal is to not kill the tasks for
non-partition aware frameworks? That seems like a pretty big change for
frameworks that are not partition aware and expect the old killing
semantics.
It seems like we should just directly fix the issue, do you have a sense of
Not a blocker, but noticed the parallel test runner isn't bundled in the
release, if you configure with '--enable-parallel-test-execution':
/Users/bmahler/Downloads/mesos-1.3.0/support/mesos-gtest-runner.py
--sequential=*ROOT_* ./stout-tests
/bin/sh:
There's a spreadsheet linked in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2604 that captures which OSes
we can support based on compiler version:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ji8p3p_1JqUsMxE31mJqqztHf7LDx7mGMXh253azWpU/edit#gid=0
Also, do we have already have a minimum clang version
This is great, I would love to see the metrics collection be low latency.
Here is the response I gave last time, with the 4 options I think we should
tackle:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@mesos.apache.org/msg37113.html
IMHO we should defer looking into the 5th option of sampling/caching
Thanks Zhitao and Anand! I've been looking forward to using arena
allocation to improve performance.
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Qian Zhang wrote:
> Thanks Anand and Zhitao!
>
> So I think we can remove the code like below, and switch to use the native
> maps supported
com> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thanks for getting back. Do you have an issue already filed for
> the "reservations to multiple roles" story, or is it folded under another
> JIRA story?
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apac
Thanks for the feedback!
There have been some discussions for allowing reservations to multiple
roles (or more generally, role expressions), which is essentially what
you've suggested Zhitao. (However, note that what is provided by the GPU
capability filtering is not quite this, it's actually
Thanks for all of your contributions to the project so far! It's been great
having you in the community
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jie Yu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I' happy to announce that the PMC has voted Gilbert Song as a new
> committer and member of PMC for the
s]
>> > <https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Mesos/job/Mesos-Rel
>> ease/32/BUILDTOOL=autotools,COMPILER=gcc,CONFIGURATION=--
>> verbose,ENVIRONMENT=GLOG_v=1%20MESOS_VERBOSE=1,OS=ubuntu%
>> 3A14.04,label_exp=(docker%7C%7CHadoop)&&(!ubuntu-us1)&&(!ub
I just was targeting a cherry pick and noticed the release isn't closed on
JIRA (see 'Releasing the Version on JIRA' section of the release guide). I
closed it and added a 1.1.3 version for folks to target for bug fixes.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Alex Rukletsov wrote:
+1 make check passes on macOS 10.12.4 with clang
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 1.0.4.
>
>
> 1.0.4 includes the following:
>
>
Do you have some examples?
Thinking through my own experience debugging tests, I tend to only get
value out of EXPECT messages when they are providing information that I
can't get access to from the line number / actual vs expected printing.
(e.g. the value of a variable). If the EXPECT message
d you be able to present this as a demo somehow? maybe via a
> screencast?
>
> MPark
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Great to see this Benjamin!
> >
> > Looking forward to seeing the parallel tes
Thanks for bringing this up Dmitry, I would also be happy to participate.
Off the top of my head the following high level approaches have been
brought up:
(1) Categorize jobs into classes. E.g. LATENCY_SENSITIVE,
THROUGHPUT_ORIENTED, etc. Essentially capturing the distinction between
online vs
optionally useful on top of IP enforcement?
(3) What will libprocess do when it finds the IP doesn't match? Drop and
log?
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> wrote:
>
It's not obvious to me what all of the implications are. I feel we need a
more comprehensive proposal here, can you do a small write up that shows
you've thought through all the implications?
E.g. how does this affect the use of proxies, multihomed hosts, our testing
facilities for message
jects to
do.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Olivier Sallou <olivier.sal...@irisa.fr>
wrote:
>
> - Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> a écrit :
> > James, I'm curious, do you know specifically what the incompatibility is?
> >
> > Olivier, if
Hi devs,
TLDR: I created a document with the help of other committers and
contributors to collect technical debt items, categorized by the benefit we
get if we fix them. If you'd like to contribute to any of these areas,
please reach out! Also feel free to make suggestions / comments on the doc:
Tomek I think that patch also needs to address accepting strings for
floating point fields: float, double.
IMO, to avoid confusion, we want to get as close as possible to the proto3
specified mapping, which allows string inputs for all types of numeric
fields:
James, I'm curious, do you know specifically what the incompatibility is?
Olivier, if you're dealing with protobuf already and trying to send it to
mesos, there's no need to use JSON. Unless you have a requirement to do so?
There are some outstanding issues with our JSON<->Protobuf conversion,
+anand, vinod
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Tomek Janiszewski
wrote:
> I have a similar problem with protobuf and json. In my case numbers were
> incorrectly unmarshaled. Here is an issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-970 and review
>
+gilbert
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Olivier Sallou
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when transforming a protobug message to json with MessageToJson, the
> json is not compatible with the json format expected by Mesos master.
>
> For example, for volumes it generates
>
>
>
Thanks Tomek, I'm not very familiar with the code but I dug in and couldn't
figure out how this is a backwards compatible change to make. Left a
comment on the review.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Tomek Janiszewski
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm looking for shepherd for MESOS-7233 —
Hi all,
Please welcome Kevin Klues as the newest committer and PMC member of the
Apache Mesos project.
Kevin has been an active contributor in the project for over a year, and in
this time he made a number of contributions to the project: Nvidia GPU
support [1], the containerization side of POD
To be a bit more clear, you can ensure that only one security principal can
register frameworks under a particular role via the 'register_frameworks'
ACLs:
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/authorization/
Externally to mesos you would need to ensure that each security principal
only
Have you looked into requiring a 3.x protobuf compiler? The 3.x series
compiler provides performance improvements via arenas for "syntax = proto2"
IIUC:
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/arenas
I filed a specific use case here:
The way I think about this is that if the field is semantically required
then there can be a default. If not, then the optionality has meaning. For
example, if there is always a notion of filtering, then having a default
filter makes sense. But if the absence of a filter means no filtering
occurs,
+neil
Is this test flaky? I wasn't able to grab the logs since jenkins appears to
be non-responsive at the moment.
[ FAILED ] RegistrarTest.PruneUnreachable
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> See
Re: modules communicating in process
I believe https://github.com/mesosphere/serenity communicates between its
resource estimator and QoS controller modules. Might be helpful to look at
how this project does it.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, ct clmsn wrote:
> i've added a
Congrats and welcome!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please welcome Neil Conway as the newest committer and PMC member of the
> Apache Mesos project.
>
> Neil has been an active contributor to Mesos for more than a year now. As
> part
+1
Thanks for taking on the explicit rejection, much needed safety
improvement. If we state that a Mesos 1.3.0 master will not support pre-1.0
agents, it seems to carry an implication that we supported 1.2 and 1.1
having pre-1.0 agents. While it might work, we should clarify for users per
vinod's
As promised when publishing the multi-role framework design doc, here is
the design doc for hierarchical roles.
Design Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ie2-6O400ayNXtRqipHq6_
CCQ4wOoLWzoqql3b0Y6HU/edit?usp=sharing
JIRA Epic:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6375
Take a look
Looks like there are some warnings for some of the loop changes:
../../../3rdparty/libprocess/src/io.cpp: In lambda function:
../../../3rdparty/libprocess/src/io.cpp:75:9: warning: control reaches end
of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}();
^
mv -f .deps/libprocess_la-io.Tpo
and gauge change, and will fix them. Can you shepherd these?
>
> I'll do another pass of other gauge usage in allocator to see whether there
> is easy low hanging fruits.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
&
the network is not the
> bottleneck, so the RPC layer is too heavy.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Benjamin Mahler [mailto:bmah...@apache.org]
> 发送时间: 2017年1月5日 9:26
> 收件人: dev
> 抄送: u...@mesos.apache.org
> 主题: Re: Optimize libprocess performance
>
> Which area
r know which metrics are
> dropped due to timeout?
>
> Also, it is not documented in
> http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/monitoring/. Should we send a
> patch to update it?
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
Which areas does the performance not meet your needs? There are a lot of
aspects to libprocess that can be optimized, so it would be good to focus
on each of your particular use cases via benchmarks, this allows us to have
a shared way to profile and measure improvements.
Copy elimination is one
The /metrics endpoint exposes a timeout parameter if you want to receive a
response with all of the metrics that were available within the timeout,
e.g. /metrics/snapshot.json?timeout=10secs
I'd recommend using this when collecting metrics so that you can maintain
visibility when a particular
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Greg Mann wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Did `sudo make check` on CentOS 7. Aside from several
> LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTests and two other flaky
> tests, CgroupsAnyHierarchyWithFreezerTest.ROOT_CGROUPS_
> DestroyTracedProcess
>
Here is the update:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54262/
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I ran into some compilation issue
I ran into some compilation issues after upgrading to OS X 10.12.1, and was
able to build successfully with Jie's help.
The first thing was that I encountered a lot of these deprecation warnings:
../../../3rdparty/libprocess/../stout/include/stout/os/posix/su.hpp:241:9:
warning: 'syscall' is
Right now this fails at container launch time rather than initialization of
the agent, seems like a bug?
Also it would be great to avoid surfacing a stack trace for this.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Alex Rukletsov wrote:
> Curl is also a prerequisite for mesos-native
The continuation needs to go through the process manager once again to
obtain a reference to the process that we'd like to deliver the message to.
One thing we could have done to avoid capturing 'this' is to grab the
ProcessReference early and pass it through to the continuation.
Unfortunately the
We wouldn't normally create the 1.1.x branch before 1.1.0 is released. If
1.1.0 doesn't go through this branch needs to be rebased and force pushed?
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:56 PM, wrote:
> Added MESOS-6142 to CHANGELOG for 1.1.1.
>
>
> Project:
Hm.. these links are all broken, were you linking to jenkins logs directly?
They get garbage collected rather quickly.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Alex Rukletsov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I observe a lot of flaky tests in Apache Jenkins. They seem rather random
> and not
This sounds good to me. A couple thoughts.
(1) Can we first define the meaning of "experimental" vs "stable" so that
it's clear to users and ourselves? This definition should encompass when we
want to call a feature experimental vs just building it and immediately
calling it stable. For example,
We would like to revive the effort to better support multi-tenant
frameworks by allowing frameworks to receive offers for multiple roles.
An initial draft of an updated design doc based on the original design by
Benjamin Bannier is available for review. Would love to get feedback on
this, feel
Thanks for publishing this! Saw some tickets being created and was
wondering where this email was.. :)
The higher level thing that strikes me is that I think the notion of a task
restart policy should be managed by the executor (i.e. the executor
restarts the task based on the policy). This is
to the UI.
> Maintenance of nodes will be presented in a table. Code is on github but
> need some tweaks and tests with large maintenance json. I'll prepare patch
> shortly (when github DDoS will be over).
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6443
>
> pt., 21.10.2016 o 20:30 użytk
Hi Su Teng,
Glad to hear you're making use of libprocess, be aware that we currently
bundle it in the mesos repository and development occurs within the mesos
project at the current time.
This issue sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5943
Are you obtaining libprocess from
Great to see this Benjamin!
Looking forward to seeing the parallel test runner turn green, I'll help
file tickets under the epic (I see there are a lot of test failures for me).
Once we clear the issues and turn it green, shall we make this the default?
I would be in favor of that.
Ben
On Thu,
Sorry for the delay Kris, I replied on the ticket.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Kris Paprocki <
kris.paprocki.mesos.mail...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone help to shepherd this ticket?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Chris
>
Hi Lijun,
Apologies that this slipped through the cracks! I've gone over the patch
and committed it.
Nice patch, thanks! Thanks to those who reviewed it as well.
Ben
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Lijun Tang wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Can I get a committer to take a look
+jie
Hi Olivier,
Could you tell us what you're trying to do at a high level?
I'm not familiar with cAdvisor, are you trying to generate a link to the
cAdvisor page for a particular container?
Ben
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Olivier Sallou
wrote:
>
>
> On
For posterity, and for those keeping track of shepherd requests, Yan
shepherded. Thanks Yan!
On Thursday, August 11, 2016, Zhitao Li wrote:
> Our modules requires conditional compile because we need to make sure we
> can cross version boundary during upgrade cycles, so
Hi Yongqiao, mesos-go is developed outside the Apache Mesos project.
Ben
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Yongqiao Wang
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> As we know, etcd-based Mesos master contender module is
> developing now, in order to let some Mesos framework wrote with GO
All of the issues I've been shepherding have been fixed.
The only one I see remaining is this one, but doesn't look like a blocking
issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5985
Anything else that needs to go in?
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
I pushed your patch, thanks!
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Charles Allen <
charles.al...@metamarkets.com> wrote:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50862/ which is a proposed fix for MESOS-5929
> needs a shepherd. Is anyone able to do that?
>
It seems to me that these particular flags are not applicable for
PARTITION_AWARE frameworks, since there is no removal occurring. For old
frameworks, they still act as if removal is occurring and so these flags
provide the backwards compatibility by rate limiting the shutting down of
+1 (binding)
OS X 10.11.6
./configure --disable-python --disable-java
make check
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Greg Mann wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Ran `sudo make distcheck` successfully on CentOS 7.1 with only one test
> failure: ExamplesTest.PythonFramework fails
iang Yan Xu
On July 14th, 2016, 8:14 p.m. PDT, Guangya Liu wrote:
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Jie Yu, and Jiang Yan Xu.
By Guangya Liu.
*Updated July 14, 2016, 8:14 p.m.*
*Repository: * mesos
Description
Updated HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.AddAndUpdateSlave to
call vect
I was reviewing code and noticed the following helper in the allocator
benchmarks [1]:
// This returns a `Labels` that has 12 key-value pairs, which should
// be more than we expect most frameworks to use in practice. We
// ensure that the first 11 key-value pairs are equal, which
This doesn't look like a "Bug" (there are a bunch of other tickets that are
misclassified). Please be sure to set the appropriate "issue type". :)
Can you go through your tickets and update the types?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alex Clemmer (JIRA)
Date: Fri,
I just ran a website update, you should see it now if you force a refresh.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Tomek Janiszewski
wrote:
> Page need to be manually generated and published.
>
> pon., 11.07.2016, 22:59 użytkownik Rich Bowen napisał:
>
> >
> >
>
Have you considered introducing 'histograms' rather than 'timers'? Our
Timers are just a special case of a histogram. For example, you could have
a histogram of response sizes.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finished implementing
+Kevin
Kevin, this looks like a change to your patch below, does his change look
good to you?
commit dae2c0667c1be913d08cff57717764c6ce7a45d9
Author: Kevin Klues
Date: Thu Dec 17 06:21:02 2015 +0100
Wrote cmd to create WANdiscoSVN file for centos.
Previously we
Welcome! Can you tell us more about how you're using Mesos?
I've added you as a contributor in JIRA. Please send a PR or review request
to get yourself added to the list of contributors:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/contributors.yaml
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Sabarish
+implementer and shepherd of SUPPRESS
Is there any reason we didn't already just "deactivate" frameworks that
were suppressing offers? That seems to be the natural implementation,
performance aside, because the meaning of "deactivated" is: not being sent
any offers. The patch you posted seems to
os ReviewBot
>
> On July 6th, 2016, 2:40 a.m. UTC, Klaus Ma wrote:
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> By Klaus Ma.
>
> *Updated July 6, 2016, 2:40 a.m.*
> *Bugs: * MESOS-5739 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5739>
> *Repository: * mesos
> Descr
.@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > To clarify, are you ok with the removeSlave example? It seems to fit your
> > criteria.
>
> I think `removeSlave` is poorly named, for similar reasons -- I just
>
To clarify, are you ok with the removeSlave example? It seems to fit your
criteria.
Usually with this kind of email we need concrete suggestions for
improvement. First though I wanted to improve some issues around naming and
the descriptions you've used in the update example to avoid conflating
Pushed by AlexR.
It would be nice if the PR bot replied to these if they are closed.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
> Added self to contributors.
> By yanyanhu
> Added Yanyan Hu to contributors list.
> June 30, 2016 at 08:42PM
> via GitHub http://ift.tt/299dAft
>
Looks like Vinod will shepherd, thanks Vinod!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Timothy Anderegg <
timothy.ander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I picked it up as part of the website working group, but don't have a
> shepherd yet.
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, 7:06 PM Benjamin Mahler &
Pushed.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
> docs: frameworks list: use correct URL for storm-mesos framework
> By erikdw
> June 30, 2016 at 04:33PM
> via GitHub http://ift.tt/2992b37
>
Pushed.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
> Add Cook to frameworks.md
> By dgrnbrg
> This adds the Cook framework to the framework list.
> June 30, 2016 at 04:39PM
> via GitHub http://ift.tt/2992mew
>
last issues to resolve.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, 11:20 PM Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to highlight two tickets that would be of great help to the
> > community.
> >
> > (1) The first is to publish documentation on the website for ea
Just wanted to highlight two tickets that would be of great help to the
community.
(1) The first is to publish documentation on the website for each release.
We currently publish periodically off of master, and so it's a pain for
users because the documentation does not reflect the version they
ils about the metrics system, but the collection client
> required me to specify metric type, probably for optimization purpose. It
> accepts 3 different types: counter, gauge and timer
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
It's worth doing because it has come up before [1] [2]. For our own
education, in your case why is the metrics collection system interested in
the type? Is it for optimization? Which metrics collection system are you
using?
What are the types that the metrics collection system understands? The
+1 (binding)
Make check on OS X 10.11.5.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Kapil Arya wrote:
> +1 (binding) Internal CI build.
>
> Here is a link to the deb/rpm packages:
>
> http://open.mesosphere.com/downloads/mesos-rc/#apache-mesos-0.26.2-rc1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016
+1 for keeping it in the repo.
We can establish maintainers for the CLI to ensure that it can maintain a
reasonable update cadence. Note that we haven't done this well for the
webui and CLI, so we need to make sure we do it better this time around.
If the architecture allows for easy integration
Moving this to a new thread (see some context below).
It may be worth exploring adding a generic mechanism for doing label-based
injection of volumes: if a container is tagged with a particular label, we
will inject a particular volume into the container.
For Nvidia GPU containers, the operator
t;dev@mesos.apache.org>; meghdoot
> bhattacharya <meghdoo...@yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:43 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Multiple framework DRF tuning
>
> Hey Meghdoot,
>
> Mesos-4687 does indeed fix
Sounds OK to me if there are no objections, since it should not be a
difficult adjustment for users to make and users can use the more
expressive JSON format for resources already. (e.g.
https://github.com/dcos/dcos/blob/1.7-open/gen/dcos-config.yaml#L95)
Also, please document this in the
> is largely immutable.
> >
> > Another distinction is that some configuration flags control behavior
> > that doesn't need to be consistent between master replicas (e.g.,
> > "--ip", "--port", "--advertise-ip", "--advertise-port&q
I wanted to start a discussion about the allocation of "scarce" resources.
"Scarce" in this context means resources that are not present on every
machine. GPUs are the first example of a scarce resource that we support as
a known resource type.
Consider the behavior when there are the following
Welcome Anand and Joseph, thanks for all of your contributions!
Looking forward to seeing your ongoing positive influences on the community
and the project, let's build great software!
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm happy to announce
I'm curious to hear thoughts on the distinction between using flags and
persisting in the registry for master configuration. This topic had come up
in a discussion and our current choices are intuitive but the criteria were
not immediately obvious.
Two cases seem interesting to me:
(1) Quota.
+1 (binding)
All tests pass on OS X with libev.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Jörg Schad wrote:
> +1 (Non-Binding)
> (sudo) make check on OSX + Update Test Script from 27.2
>
> Two test failures (FetcherCacheTest.LocalUncachedExtract and
>
Cool stuff Andrew, thanks for sharing!
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Spyker
wrote:
> FYI, based on the work others have done in the past, Netflix was able to
> get Mesos agent building and running on Raspberry Pi natively and under
> Docker containers.
Thanks Tomasz!
Does the style checker now catch NULL introductions?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Michael Park wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tomasz Janiszewski kindly started the initiative on the migration to
> `nullptr`, and we have closed MESOS-3243
>
+jörg
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> wrote:
> Any update on getting the coverity scan up and running?
>
> It used to send us new defects as commits land, and that helped us catch a
> number of bugs, so it would be great to see it revived!
Thanks Kevin! I would love to see improvements to our current system of
subcomponent maintainers, so I would be happy to participate.
What does it mean to be added to the working group now that we use email
[TOPIC] prefixes?
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Kevin Klues
+kevin for context
When we approached this problem there were a few routes we could take. One
approach we were leaning towards was to allow the help information to be
specified directly in markdown rather than in C++. Markdown would be the
only source of help information, and the C++ code calling
Any update on getting the coverity scan up and running?
It used to send us new defects as commits land, and that helped us catch a
number of bugs, so it would be great to see it revived!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Jörg Schad wrote:
> Hi,
> just a short update on why
+alexr
It would be helpful if the shepherd replies to the list when they get
involved. Hard to tell from the mailing list that this was picked up.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Tomek Janiszewski
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can anyone help shepherd MESOS-2201 – Fixed replica log
Here is a test that catches the issue:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47362/
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Mahler <bmah...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes definitely! We would want to test that a connection without any data
> sent does not block subsequent requests when SS
t; > However, do we still want to separate different sorts of cleanups as
> well or
> > squash them together to avoid the churn? If I search for a bug and see a
> > style fix patch, I simply skip. I'd rather prefer to have one single
> patch
> > for all style fixes than a tiny patch f
201 - 300 of 1393 matches
Mail list logo