Re: Are there any supported systems without O_CLOEXEC?

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > Is this altering the minimum Linux or OS X version we support? I couldn't find a clear statement of what OS support we guarantee. OS X got O_CLOEXEC in 10.10. CentOS 6.9 has kernel 2.6.32, apparently Ubuntu 14.04

Re: Are there any supported systems without O_CLOEXEC?

Is this altering the minimum Linux or OS X version we support? On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:15 AM, James Peach wrote: > > > On Sep 27, 2017, at 5:03 PM, James Peach wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > In MESOS-8027 and https://reviews.apache.org/r/62638/, I'm

Re: Are there any supported systems without O_CLOEXEC?

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 5:03 PM, James Peach wrote: > > Hi all, > > In MESOS-8027 and https://reviews.apache.org/r/62638/, I'm claiming that, in > practice, we do not have any supported platforms that don't implement > O_CLOEXEC to open. All current Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris

Are there any supported systems without O_CLOEXEC?

Hi all, In MESOS-8027 and https://reviews.apache.org/r/62638/, I'm claiming that, in practice, we do not have any supported platforms that don't implement O_CLOEXEC to open. All current Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris versions implement O_CLOEXEC. Does anyone know of a platform that doesn't have