Re: Confusion about the two different approaches of implementing a scheduler

Hi, Vinod: Thanks for the quick response. For both approaches, the client creates the scheduler locally, via self-defined call-back functions, and uses the scheduler locally. I'm wondering if this is a fixed pattern? My boss talks about creating some kind of a "remote" scheduler, interacting

Re: Confusion about the two different approaches of implementing a scheduler

Hi WenZhao, v1 is definitely the recommended way to go if you are building a new scheduler today. v0 will be deprecated at some point. Since v0 API has been around much longer than v1, it is not surprising that most online tutorials/docs reference that. Thanks, On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:25 AM,