Other jobs finish in 50 min but they do clang/gcc and cmake/auttools checks
so total build time takes 2h.
I hope we can make next release with ARM binaries. Tere was some proposal
of making official Mesos binaries (debs, rpms etc) so we can plug in this
process.
wt., 20 mar 2018 o 15:35
Thank you!
ARM builds are passing right now [0]. We are using ubuntu-16.04-arm image
[1]. I think from next release we can consider ARM as a supported platform!
0:
Done.
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Tomek Janiszewski wrote:
>
> Thanks for merging. Can we push this image to dockerhub tagged as
> ubuntu-16.04-arm? Then we will need to update CI configuration to:
> JOBS=16 OS=ubuntu-16.04-arm BUILDTOOL=cmake COMPILER=gcc
>
Thanks for merging. Can we push this image to dockerhub tagged as
ubuntu-16.04-arm? Then we will need to update CI configuration to:
JOBS=16 OS=ubuntu-16.04-arm BUILDTOOL=cmake COMPILER=gcc
CONFIGURATION='--disable-java --disable-python --disable-libtool-wrappers'
ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1
Dockerfile for ARM with CMake support https://reviews.apache.org/r/66138/
pon., 12 lut 2018 o 15:41 użytkownik Tomek Janiszewski
napisał:
> How can I use it for our ARM CI?
>
> JOBS=16 OS=arm64v8/ubuntu:16.04 ./support/mesos-build.sh
> + set -e
> + set -o pipefail
> + :
How can I use it for our ARM CI?
JOBS=16 OS=arm64v8/ubuntu:16.04 ./support/mesos-build.sh
+ set -e
+ set -o pipefail
+ : arm64v8/ubuntu:16.04
+ : autotools
+ : gcc
+ : '--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers'
+ : 'GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'
+ : 16
++ git rev-parse --show-toplevel
+
The first run looks good! https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Buildbot/4890/
[image: Screen Shot 2018-02-07 at 10.30.51 PM.png]
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:39 PM Michael Park wrote:
> Yep, Just landed! Waiting for https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Buildbot to
> pick it up.
>
>
Yep, Just landed! Waiting for https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Buildbot to
pick it up.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:27 PM Vinod Kone wrote:
> Yay, thanks MPark! Has the change landed already?
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Michael Park wrote:
>
> >
Yay, thanks MPark! Has the change landed already?
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Michael Park wrote:
> Many of you probably know that we currently have `support/docker-build.sh`
> to power our CI for our various configurations. One of the problems for us
> has been that we
Many of you probably know that we currently have `support/docker-build.sh`
to power our CI for our various configurations. One of the problems for us
has been that we create a `Dockerfile` ad-hoc and invoke `docker build`
with it. This is very inefficient and also leads to flaky issues around
10 matches
Mail list logo