On Nov. 22, 2013, 12:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
Brenden Matthews wrote:
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in
production for a few days though.
On Nov. 22, 2013, 8:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
Brenden Matthews wrote:
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in
production for a few days though.
On Nov. 22, 2013, 8:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
Brenden Matthews wrote:
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in
production for a few days though.
On Nov. 22, 2013, 8:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
Brenden Matthews wrote:
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in
production for a few days though.
On Nov. 22, 2013, 8:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
Brenden Matthews wrote:
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in
production for a few days though.
On Nov. 22, 2013, 8:04 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Did we get to a conclusion regarding case 1)? and could we write a test
which exercises the new scenarios?
If I get some time, I'll write a test. I've been testing it in production for
a few days though.
Not sure about consensus.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15745/#review29244
---
Awesome Brenden! Can we write tests that covers the new scenarios?
On Nov. 21, 2013, 7:59 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, line 1597
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15745/diff/2/?file=389363#file389363line1597
What happens if status.task_id() does not exist in tasks? Is it
silently ignored or does it fail?
In this case I'm
On Nov. 21, 2013, 10:03 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Slaves continue to retry status updates until an acknowledgement is
received (the scheduler driver sends an acknowledgement once
Scheduler::statusUpdate was invoked). So in Case 1 you've described, if a
task transitions while a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15745/
---
(Updated Nov. 22, 2013, 12:30 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15745/#review29249
---
Slaves continue to retry status updates until an acknowledgement is
On Nov. 21, 2013, 7:59 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, line 1597
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15745/diff/2/?file=389363#file389363line1597
What happens if status.task_id() does not exist in tasks? Is it
silently ignored or does it fail?
Brenden Matthews
12 matches
Mail list logo
