On Jan. 15, 2015, 7:43 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This is an extremely common pattern in the code, and so we should avoid
doing it in an inconsistent manner.
FWIW, we've yet to see leaks from this pattern, but if you want to make
this change, let's do it as a broad sweep instead of
On Jan. 15, 2015, 11:43 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This is an extremely common pattern in the code, and so we should avoid
doing it in an inconsistent manner.
FWIW, we've yet to see leaks from this pattern, but if you want to make
this change, let's do it as a broad sweep instead of
On Jan. 15, 2015, 7:43 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This is an extremely common pattern in the code, and so we should avoid
doing it in an inconsistent manner.
FWIW, we've yet to see leaks from this pattern, but if you want to make
this change, let's do it as a broad sweep instead of
On Jan. 15, 2015, 11:43 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This is an extremely common pattern in the code, and so we should avoid
doing it in an inconsistent manner.
FWIW, we've yet to see leaks from this pattern, but if you want to make
this change, let's do it as a broad sweep instead of
Let's look at the two options:
1. Used Owned now only in this location, add a ticket to do a sweep.
2. Use the existing pattern, add a ticket to do a sweep.
Removing a single instance from the sweep you're planning to do doesn't
seem to warrant the inconsistency in such a common pattern (Process
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29926/
---
Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske and Niklas Nielsen.
Bugs: MESOS-2213
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29926/#review68303
---
This is an extremely common pattern in the code, and so we should
