---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30948/#review72347
---
Just to confirm: do we revert these patches from master or from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30948/#review72401
---
This looks good, I'm curious though, were you unable to revert the
On Feb. 13, 2015, 6:15 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This looks good, I'm curious though, were you unable to revert the specific
commits at this point?
How did you get this diff?
- Ben
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
On Feb. 13, 2015, 10:15 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This looks good, I'm curious though, were you unable to revert the specific
commits at this point?
Ben Mahler wrote:
How did you get this diff?
I did a reverse diff of the chain and fixed the conflicts. I could have split
this in
On Feb. 13, 2015, 12:41 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
Just to confirm: do we revert these patches from master or from 0.22
release only?
From master/HEAD. Instead of cherry picking the commits out (which would
potentially touch many commits), we tag HEAD and apply the reverse diff.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30948/#review72408
---
Ship it!
Thanks Nik, looking forward to landing configurable
On Feb. 13, 2015, 6:15 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
This looks good, I'm curious though, were you unable to revert the specific
commits at this point?
Ben Mahler wrote:
How did you get this diff?
Niklas Nielsen wrote:
I did a reverse diff of the chain and fixed the conflicts. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30948/
---
Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30948/#review72313
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [30948]
All tests passed.
-
