We are targetting 17 tickets. It include improvements and bug fixes. 4
of them are still in progress.
http://s.apache.org/mesos-0.20.1-unresolved-issues
I'll cut the tag for RC1 and send for voting, once these issues are
reviewed/submitted or 9/15 @6pm PDT, whichever comes first! The open
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25566/#review53449
---
Ship it!
src/master/master.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25567/#review53450
---
Ship it!
src/master/master.hpp
It's already past 9/16 6 pm PDT?
Tim
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org wrote:
We are targetting 17 tickets. It include improvements and bug fixes. 4
of them are still in progress.
http://s.apache.org/mesos-0.20.1-unresolved-issues
I'll cut the tag for RC1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25568/#review53484
---
src/tests/master_tests.cpp
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org wrote:
I'll cut the tag for RC1 and send for voting, once these issues are
reviewed/submitted or 9/15 @6pm PDT, whichever comes first! The open
issues (if any) will be moved to next release, at that point in time.
You want
Bhuvan,
Thanks a ton! Are you going to do a cut, or cherry-pick on top of 0.20.0?
- Jie
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org wrote:
We are targetting 17 tickets. It include improvements and bug fixes. 4
of them are still in progress.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25569/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 7:07 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
On Sept. 12, 2014, 11:39 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Thanks for following up!
Not your fault, but the current design of enable() seems a bit unfortunate,
because we will print things excessively unless we use static variables as
you've done here.
What about the following instead?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25569/#review53491
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [25569]
Failed command:
On Sept. 15, 2014, 4:38 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, line 4010
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25250/diff/4/?file=682254#file682254line4010
I suggest we use TASK_LOST here instead. We definitely want a terminal
state like TASK_KILLED, but we've reserved
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25695/
---
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-1195
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25523/#review53528
---
src/docker/docker.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25270/#review53531
---
Ship it!
src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
On Sept. 9, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
src/docker/docker.cpp, line 337
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25403/diff/1/?file=680701#file680701line337
Why not move this up above as well?
Timothy Chen wrote:
The Docker cli --entrypoint only allows you to put in a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25695/#review53534
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [25695]
Failed command: ./configure
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25403/#review53533
---
Ship it!
But I re-opened the '-c' issue so that you can add a
On Sept. 9, 2014, 6:15 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Why did you need to mock DockerContainerizerProcess in order to write these
tests? Couldn't you have just used the existing MockDockerContainerizer?
Timothy Chen wrote:
I wanted to simulate having destroy called in a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25569/#review53541
---
src/tests/environment.cpp
Okay - that only solves half of the problem for us: users will still see
their frameworks as running even though they completed but it is a first
step.
Let's continue the discussion in a JIRA ticket; I'll create one shortly.
Thanks for helping out!
Niklas
On 15 September 2014 18:17, Benjamin
On Sept. 16, 2014, 3:38 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [25695]
Failed command: ./configure
Error:
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking target system type...
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/#review53553
---
Looking much better, thanks Kapil!!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25695/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 6:19 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25663/#review53558
---
src/master/detector.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 2:48 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
On Sept. 15, 2014, 6:46 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/version.hpp, lines 32-34
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/diff/3/?file=688423#file688423line32
The program will crash if the split is non-numeric, because you'll call
.get() on a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25695/#review53571
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25695]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/#review53569
---
Almost there!!
I think we can get away with not needing to expose
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/#review53572
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [25597]
Failed command:
Hey everyone,
I've been working on a potential extension to Hadoop on Mesos which allows
the framework to potentially release allocated (but idle) TaskTracker slots
if they are doing nothing. This helps release resources hadoop is allocated
but not using, to increase overall cluster utilisation
On Sept. 15, 2014, 2:46 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/version.hpp, lines 32-34
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/diff/3/?file=688423#file688423line32
The program will crash if the split is non-numeric, because you'll call
.get() on a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 4:39 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 4:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
On Sept. 15, 2014, 6:46 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/version.hpp, lines 32-34
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/diff/3/?file=688423#file688423line32
The program will crash if the split is non-numeric, because you'll call
.get() on a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 9:05 nachm.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/#review53595
---
Ship it!
Thanks Kapil, looks great! I will get this committed for
On Sept. 15, 2014, 9:02 nachm., Vinod Kone wrote:
CHANGELOG, lines 1-9
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/diff/7/?file=688718#file688718line1
Thinking a bit more about this and talking to others. Adding
deprecations in a bug fix release is bit weird.
2 options.
On Sept. 16, 2014, 9:05 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Thanks Kapil, looks great! I will get this committed for you shortly, I'll
just add a TODO per your comments on more than 3 version components and
I'll remove the single quotes per my comment below.
Committed!
- Ben
On Sept. 15, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Timothy St. Clair wrote:
src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp, line 837
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/diff/7/?file=688721#file688721line837
What happens in the case where all CPUs are taken but memory is
available? It looks like it
On Sept. 15, 2014, 3:23 nachm., Timothy St. Clair wrote:
src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp, line 837
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/diff/7/?file=688721#file688721line837
What happens in the case where all CPUs are taken but memory is
available? It looks like it
Tim, sorry. I meant today, 9/16 @6pm PDT.
Vinod, yes, Adam is helping me to push CHANGELOG. I'll work with him
to create tag, mvn push, etc.
Jie, i'm hoping to go with tags. I'll create a tag for 0.20.1-rc1. For
new RC builds (if any), i'll create new tag from previous RC and
cherry-pick the bug
On Sept. 16, 2014, 5:05 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Thanks Kapil, looks great! I will get this committed for you shortly, I'll
just add a TODO per your comments on more than 3 version components and
I'll remove the single quotes per my comment below.
Ben Mahler wrote:
Committed!
On Sept. 15, 2014, 3:23 p.m., Timothy St. Clair wrote:
src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp, line 837
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/diff/7/?file=688721#file688721line837
What happens in the case where all CPUs are taken but memory is
available? It looks like it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25549/#review53402
---
A few style issues. I'll let Vinod to give a final ship it.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25597/#review53608
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25597]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25569/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 10:35 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25403/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 10:37 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Disable-Java-Disable-Python-Disable-Webui/2374/changes
Changes:
[bmahler] Added a Version class to stout.
--
[...truncated 58686 lines...]
I0916 23:01:05.386067 21051 replica.cpp:676]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25035/#review53621
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25035]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25270/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 11:04 p.m.)
Review request for drill, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25270/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 11:04 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1587/changes
Changes:
[bmahler] Added a Version class to stout.
--
[...truncated 5517 lines...]
Removing 3rdparty/libprocess/config.status
Removing 3rdparty/libprocess/config.sub
Removing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25569/#review53627
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25569]
All tests passed.
-
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1588/
On Sept. 16, 2014, 7:27 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25695]
All tests passed.
I'll let @jieyu comment shepherd this, but I think we should not rush this into
0.20.1 because this is not a bug in 0.20.0.
- Vinod
+Tim Chen
Can you take a look at the health check failure?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1802
I'll take a look at the Registrar test:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1803
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
See
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25523/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 1:06 a.m.)
Review request for drill and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25523/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 1:07 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
Hi Ben,
Sounds good, I'll take a look sometime tonight or tomorrow.
Tim
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Benjamin Mahler
benjamin.mah...@gmail.com wrote:
+Tim Chen
Can you take a look at the health check failure?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1802
I'll take a look at the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25403/#review53637
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [25403]
All tests passed.
-
Release update:
We have finalized the issue/commits that will make it for this
release. We are waiting to merge these 2 patches, before we cut 0.20.1
RC1:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25403/
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25523/
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1590/changes
Changes:
[vinodkone] Enabled bridge network for Docker Containerizer.
--
[...truncated 3883 lines...]
make check-am
make[3]: Entering directory
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1591/
--
[...truncated 3870 lines...]
make[6]: Leaving directory
`https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/ws/mesos-0.21.0/_build/3rdparty/libprocess'
make[5]: Leaving directory
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-In-Src-Set-JAVA_HOME/2106/changes
Changes:
[vinodkone] Enabled bridge network for Docker Containerizer.
--
[...truncated 3121 lines...]
byte-compiling
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Ubuntu-distcheck/334/changes
Changes:
[vinodkone] Enabled bridge network for Docker Containerizer.
--
[...truncated 3865 lines...]
libtool: link: g++ -g -g2 -O2 -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -std=c++11 -o tests
65 matches
Mail list logo
