Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

Here's some input :). If throttling is tolerable but preemption is not, how would that be expressed? (Is that supported?) [Klaus]: It's not supported; only revocable resources has this attribute: non-throttleable or throttleable. The throttleable revocable resources is reported by

Re: Mesos Cgroups Unified Isolator Design

Thanks a lot for your detailed revises! On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Erik Weathers wrote: > gave a bunch of minor grammar comments to make the wording flow. > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:21 AM, haosdent wrote: > >> Dear friends. I hope you have a

Mesos Cgroups Unified Isolator Design

Dear friends. I hope you have a good weekend. Jie Yu and I are working on add a new cgroups unified isolator to solve the problems we encountered in cgroups isolation. For more details about it, we recorded it in this epic: [Consolidate cgroup isolators into one single isolator]:

Re: Backport r/44230 to 0.27 branch

Zemeer, thanks for the input. I think we should discuss that in the next community sync (can you join?). Vinod did some analysis on how people feel about the release cadence, but I don't see that results being published. Should we discuss that again and come up with some concrete action items? -

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.28.0 (rc2)

Here is a link to the rpm/deb packages: http://open.mesosphere.com/downloads/mesos/#apache-mesos-0.28.0 Best, Kapil On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Vinod Kone wrote: > +1 > > @vinodkone > > On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > > Jake -

Re: Backport r/44230 to 0.27 branch

> > like many other review requests are burned or take 6+ months to merge Have you reached out to any shepherd for that ticket/review? - Jie On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jie Yu wrote: > >

Re: Backport r/44230 to 0.27 branch

> > Why not check your backlog for your answer? Or do you need me to write > a script to scan all the pending review requests for you? OK, i just looked at your pending patches: https://reviews.apache.org/users/wangcong/?show-closed=0 The associated tickets:

Re: Backport r/44230 to 0.27 branch

Maybe we can try to draft a formal guideline about when/how something should be back ported, and making sure interested parties in the community have chance to get their voices heard? I'm also interested in knowing how much work it generates when they cut with back port releases, and how the