Re: CHANGELOG entry for 1.x.0 releases

Yep, not sure of the context but I think we should definitely continue writing WIP entries. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:30 AM Vinod Kone wrote: > Don't know who told you that, but we have definitely been adding WIP > CHANGELOG entries on the master branch for a long time. As

Re: CHANGELOG entry for 1.x.0 releases

Don't know who told you that, but we have definitely been adding WIP CHANGELOG entries on the master branch for a long time. As you mentioned this is important for reducing release manager overhead. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Jie Yu wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was told

CHANGELOG entry for 1.x.0 releases

Hi folks, I was told that for 1.x.0 releases, we should not add WIP CHANGELOG entries until a release candidate is cut. However, I'd argue that we should keep adding WIP entries (mainly 'new feature' and 'deprecation') to the CHANGELOG for 1.x.0 releases. For the ticket list, we should use the