Re: Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-06 Thread Vinod Kone
On Aug. 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m., Brenden Matthews wrote: Is there not a better way to handle this process in an automated fashion? It seems to require user intervention if the slave gets in to a bad state. Vinod Kone wrote: Thats a good point. The reason we wanted explicit intervention

Re: Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-06 Thread Vinod Kone
On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:56 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: src/slave/slave.cpp, line 398 https://reviews.apache.org/r/13261/diff/1/?file=336047#file336047line398 s/f/rf/? it's a symlink. On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:56 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: src/slave/slave.cpp, lines 2563-2565

Re: Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-06 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13261/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 5:54 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman

Re: Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-06 Thread Brenden Matthews
On Aug. 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m., Brenden Matthews wrote: Is there not a better way to handle this process in an automated fashion? It seems to require user intervention if the slave gets in to a bad state. Vinod Kone wrote: Thats a good point. The reason we wanted explicit intervention

Re: Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-05 Thread Ben Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13261/#review24666 --- Ship it! src/slave/slave.cpp

Review Request 13261: Clarified the guidance for users when slave recovery fails.

2013-08-03 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13261/ --- Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Brenden Matthews.