The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25
Those versions are fixing some Datagram session issue:
* DIRMINA-996 IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
* DIRMINA-1172 Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object
We
hi!
WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
This is a vote for a triple release:
* MINA 2.2.3
* MINA 2.1.8
* MINA 2.0.25
Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress Collision
DIRMINA-1172:Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
MINA 2.2.2, 2.1.7 and 2.0.24
Those versions are fixing some SSL/TLS issues and bring some added features:
* DIRMINA-1122: support for endpoint identification algorithm (thanks
to Marcin L)
* DIRMINA-1157: A fix for a sporadic
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
MINA 2.2.1
This version is a bug fix release of the previous release: an wrongly
configured OSGi export set has made it impossible to use MINA 2.2.0 in
an OSGi environment. This is the only modification, beside some
javadoc
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
MINA 2.2.0
This version sees a complete rewrite of the SSL/TLS layer. It should
be mostly compatible with the previous versions, except if you were to
implement the startTLS command.
We consider this a stable and production
Hi,
A mistake was made while releasing Apache MINA FtpServer 1.1.3: the
API was broken. Those two releases are fixing this mistake:
- 1.1.4 will revert back ion the changes that broke the API ascendant
compatibility
- 1.2.0 will contain the changes in the API that makes it possible to
specify
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of FtpServer 1.1.3.
This release contains an updated version of the Log4J 2 library
(2.17.1) and some fixes relative to TLS 1.3..
We consider this a stable and production ready release.
Java 8 is required to run this version.
We
Hi,
This is a bug fix release. This version uses the latest MINA release
(2.1.6), the latest Log4j version (2.17.1) and an issue with TLS 1.3
that wasn't enabled properly.
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not approved)
The newly approved Nexus has been used for
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
MINA 2.0.23.
This is a bug fix release. Many fixes made in 2.1.6 and 2.2 were
backported in this version.
We consider this a stable and production ready release.
Java 8 is required to run this version.
We welcome you to try
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of Apache MINA 2.1.6.
This is a bug fix release
We consider this a stable and production ready release.
Java 8 is required to run this version.
We welcome you to try it out.
The latest release is now available here:
Hi,
This is a maintenance release for MINA 2.0.
It contains many backported issues from the 2.1 and 2.2 branches.
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not
approved):
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mina.git;a=commit;h=ccb577ed622490a84780f039840ddc640c6a0874
Hi,
I'm closing this vote, with 4 binding +1:
Jeff (Geneder)
Jeff (Maury)
Jonathan
and me.
I'll push the packages and announce it asap.
Thanks !
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 5:48 PM Jeff MAURY wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 9:18 AM Emmanuel Lecharny
>
Hi,
This is a bug fix release for MINA.
Here is the list of fixed issues :
* [DIRMINA-1152] IoServiceStatistics introduces huge latencies
* [DIRMINA-1156]Inconsistent worker / idleWorker in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor
It also contain some minor fixes (ignored tests being fixed, a minor
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce the release of FtpServer 1.1.2.
This release contains an updated version of the Log4J 2 library (2.17.0).
We consider this a stable and production ready release.
Java 8 is required to run this version.
We welcome you to try it out. We have tried
Hi!
I will be absent for the next 10 days (with no computer)
I may vote if needed, using my phone, if an urgent log4j release hits the
world ;-)
Otherwise, the good news for 2022 is that Îm going to work half time, so
I’ll be able to participate way more than in 2021!
In the mean time, merry
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce MINA 2.0.22 and 2.1.5 !
Apache MINA (http://mina.apache.org) is a network application
framework which helps users develop high performance and high
scalability network applications easily by providing an abstract,
event-driven, asynchronous API over
Hi Matt,
we could modify the build to generate distinguish packages for the
various JAVA version (at least for the LTS supported versions, like
Java 11 and Java 14).
The thing is that we added some Jenkins tasks for Java 11 and 14n, and
MINA tests fail with those versions, so there are thing we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858171#comment-16858171
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1116:
There is something you can do : check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858147#comment-16858147
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1116:
At this point, you have top understand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855899#comment-16855899
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-996:
---
Thanks Paul. Yes, same idea : you generate a key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855808#comment-16855808
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-996:
---
The {{ExpiringMap}} could use a {{Map
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce MINA 2.1.3 !
Apache MINA (https://mina.apache.org) is a network application
framework which helps users develop high performance and high
scalability network applications easily by providing an abstract,
event-driven, asynchronous API over various
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16854114#comment-16854114
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1116:
Otherwise, can you attach a capture
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1105:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
> SSLHandler buf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-996:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
> IoSessionRecyc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1064:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
2.0.23
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1035:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
> HttpServerDeco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1014:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
> SocketAcceptor does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1113:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.3)
2.1.4
> Random fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16850828#comment-16850828
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1113:
The test is marked as {{@Ignored}} atm.
Guus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
> 100% CPU (epoll bug) on 2.1.x, Linux o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847944#comment-16847944
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1113:
It seems that the test is faulty. Here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1113:
---
Attachment: PriorityThreadPoolExecutor-failure.diff
> Random fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847830#comment-16847830
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1113:
The patch for DIRMINA-1110 does not fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1113:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1.3
> Random fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847557#comment-16847557
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1110:
Patch applied in 2.1.X branch.
Many thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847111#comment-16847111
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1113:
No, this is not the cause.
If I print what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847045#comment-16847045
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1113:
I think there is a possible collision as we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16845663#comment-16845663
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
I have commented the {{buf.reset()}} line
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRMINA-1113:
--
Summary: Random failure on
PriorityThreadPoolExecutorTest.testPrioritisation
Key: DIRMINA-1113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1113
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16845261#comment-16845261
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Can we backport the fix to 2.0 ?
> SslHand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844890#comment-16844890
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
We might updated the written bytes counter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844847#comment-16844847
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
Ok, after some history digging, I find out why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844683#comment-16844683
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
Do you have a link to the OpenFire issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844611#comment-16844611
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Great !
Jonathan, I let you merge the branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843823#comment-16843823
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Guus,
I have checked Jonathan's patch on my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842300#comment-16842300
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
Running {{top -H -p }} and {{jstack }} could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842296#comment-16842296
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
Also we would need the complete stack trace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842288#comment-16842288
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-:
Hmmm, I don't think so. There is not so many
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842227#comment-16842227
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Continuing my archeocodology, here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842072#comment-16842072
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Forget about leveraging the {{event}} method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16841505#comment-16841505
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
FTR, I just deleted a comment and an attached
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1107:
---
Attachment: (was: ssl.diff)
> SslHandler flushScheduledEvents race condit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1107:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: So here is my first proposed change in {{SslFilter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1107:
---
Attachment: ssl.diff
> SslHandler flushScheduledEvents race condition, re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16841490#comment-16841490
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
So here is my first proposed change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16841096#comment-16841096
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Don't worry, we hijacked the thread devising
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16841071#comment-16841071
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Agreed. In any case, that would be quite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840575#comment-16840575
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
It should never be a filter, that's for sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840518#comment-16840518
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
We could actually write the fixed size buffer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840433#comment-16840433
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Side note: The way encrypted messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840420#comment-16840420
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1108:
There is a 30 seconds keepalive parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840413#comment-16840413
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Ok, after having analysed the {{filterWrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16839462#comment-16839462
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
My point, exactly. We should have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16839167#comment-16839167
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
What I mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838939#comment-16838939
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcThe big problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838921#comment-16838921
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Key renegotiation (which has been removed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838918#comment-16838918
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
@Jonathan what for ? Once the HS is completed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838914#comment-16838914
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Regarding the multi-threading aspect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838898#comment-16838898
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
There are a few bad things done
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838682#comment-16838682
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
I'd rather have this issue cover both versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838669#comment-16838669
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
The pb is that we have 2 queues, and we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838647#comment-16838647
]
Emmanuel Lecharny edited comment on DIRMINA-1107 at 5/13/19 3:59 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838647#comment-16838647
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1107:
Seems like we should include the counter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved FTPSERVER-494.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied.
> Documentation fix xml syntax: rem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16835852#comment-16835852
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on FTPSERVER-494:
-
Thanks, patch applied !
> Documentat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved FTPSERVER-492.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied (commit http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved FTPSERVER-493.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied with commit http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1101.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
Fixed for 2.1 branch. Still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1103:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
> Avoid sticky byte array buffers in Zlib CompressionFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1103.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.21
This has been fixed a while ago
Please proceed!
Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 02:28, Jonathan Valliere a écrit :
> Okay, looks like we have 4 votes with Emmanuel Lecharny, Jean-François
> Maury, Jeff Genender, and Jonathan Valliere
>
> Emmanuel, do you want to make these changes or should I?
>
> On Wed, May 1
Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 18:27, Jonathan Valliere a
écrit :
> I'd like to call a vote on the following proposal for branch changes for
> MINA.
>
>1. Rename 2.1 to 2.1.X because 2.1 is our root branch from which 2.1.1
>and 2.1.2 spawn. The HEAD of 2.1.X should represent the current
>
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce MINA 2.1.2 !
Apache MINA (http://mina.apache.org) is a network application
framework which helps users develop high performance and high
scalability network applications easily by providing an abstract,
event-driven, asynchronous API over various
Damn, totally missed Jonathan’s vote!
Goody! I’ll close the vote tonite and push the packages before jumping to
the airport...
Thanks, guys!
Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 14:56, Jeff Genender a écrit :
> You have 3 if you count yourself. Jonathon, me, and you. Did you want
> one more beyond 3?
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-1106.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with commit {color:#00
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16818838#comment-16818838
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1106:
After investigation, this is due
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRMINA-1106:
--
Summary: SSL/TLS error when using Apache LDAP API with MINA 2.1.1
Key: DIRMINA-1106
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1106
Project: MINA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16817977#comment-16817977
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1105:
We can also improve the way we manage incoming
Description: Handling of the close_notify SSL/TLS message does not
lead to a connection closure, leading the server to retain the socket
opened and to have the client potentially receive clear-text messages
which were supposed to be encrypted.
This security issue is fixed by Apache MINA 2.0.21 or
The Apache MINA project is pleased to announce MINA 2.0.21 and 2.1.1 !
Apache MINA (http://mina.apache.org) is a network application
framework which helps users develop high performance and high
scalability network applications easily by providing an abstract,
event-driven, asynchronous API over
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRMINA-1105:
--
Summary: SSLHandler buffer handling
Key: DIRMINA-1105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1105
Project: MINA
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1104:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
2.0.22
> IoBufferHexDumper.getHexd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1104:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
2.1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRMINA-1095:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
2.1.1
> Seems l
Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRMINA-1104:
--
Summary: IoBufferHexDumper.getHexdump(IoBuffer in, int
lengthLimit) does not truncate the output
Key: DIRMINA-1104
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810763#comment-16810763
]
Emmanuel Lecharny edited comment on DIRMINA-1103 at 4/5/19 12:36 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810763#comment-16810763
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1103:
Cool ! So I guess we can close this ticket
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810675#comment-16810675
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1103:
Question: there is a {{cleanup}} method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810356#comment-16810356
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-1103:
As Jonathan said, releasing the private buffer
1 - 100 of 3432 matches
Mail list logo
