+1
Regards,
Alan
On May 31, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing
on windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm
now wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now
wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that
magically the release gets out of the box.
My opinion is that the
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0
Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as well :-)
/niklas
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version
Le Mon, 31 May 2010 09:18:24 +0200,
Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com a écrit :
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0
Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as
well :-)
/niklas
+1, as soon
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now
wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting
+1
Jeff
On May 31, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm
